Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-884-0 | CAS number: 128-39-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The most sensitive endpoint is the NOEC for plants (shoot fresh weight, oats) with 6.97 mg/kg dw.
Additional information
The experimentally determined most sensitive endpoint is the NOEC for plants (shoot fresh weight, oats) with 6.97 mg/kg dw. This value will be used for the risk assessment.
In the past, the PNEC soil was calculated based on the comparison of a read across approach and the results from the EPM method. The more conservative approach (EPM method) was used and delivered a PNEC soil that was more conservative than the new, test based, value by a factor of >10. The approach is described below for information only. Please be aware that the now applicable PNEC soil is based on the experimental test data as described under "Description of key information".
Read Across approach
PNEC calculation based on terrestrial Read-Across data
Versonnen et al. 2014 (Sci Total
Environ.2014 Mar 15;475:123-31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.10.058.
Epub 2013 Nov 14. Analysis of the ecotoxicity data submitted within the
framework of the REACH Regulation: part 4. Experimental terrestrial
toxicity assays. Versonnen B, Tarazona JV, Cesnaitis R, Sobanska MA,
Sobanski T, Bonnomet V, De Coen W.) describe that also for terrestrial
endpoints “Standard REACH information requirements can be adapted on the
basis of REACH column 2 rules for adaptation mentioned above, as well as
on the basis of the 'general rules for adaptation' listed in Annex XI of
the REACH Regulation. These general rules are applicable to all
endpoints and include weight of evidence (WoE) approaches, qualitative
or quantitative structure-activity relationship ((Q)SAR), in vitro
methods, grouping of substances and read-across, indications that
testing is technically not possible, and tailored exposure-driven
approaches”.
Therefore read across data from structural analogues in the “phenols”
category, using the OECD QSAR Toolbox 3.2.0.103 was generated:
Read across data
Test/OECD TG |
Predicted NOEC for 2,6-DTBP, mg/kg soildw |
Range of NOEC values used for read across, mg/kg soildw |
Long-term toxicity to terrestrial invertebrate (earthworm)/OECD 222 |
800 |
125 – 1250 |
Long-term toxicity to terrestrial plants: seedling emergence and growth/OECD 208 |
251 |
113-370 |
Long-term effects on soil microorganisms: nitrogen transformation test/OECD 216 |
399 |
2 – 1250 |
(see below under “Data basis- Newly generated data” for more details)
The read across assessments were
conducted according to the relevant guidance documents and 2,6-DTBP
falls in all three cases into the applicability domain (please see
chapter “Data basis” and Annex 2 for detailed prediction reports in TPRF
(Toolbox Prediction Reporting Format)). Therefore the consortium regards
this data to be scientifically valid.
Following ECHA guidance on PNECsoil calculation using assessment factors
(Table R.10-10 in Chapter R.10) the PNEC soil can be calculated using an
assessment factor (AF) of 10 (with three long-term NOEC values for three
trophic levels available) on the lowest of the three NOECs (251 mg/kg
soil dw).
Accordingly the PNECdry soilwould be 25.1 mg/kg soil dw.
Using as a worst case the lowest experimental NOEC value for the
analogues (2 mg/kg soildw) with an AF of 10 the respective PNECdry
soilcalculates out as 0.2 mg/kg soil dw.
All NOECs over all trophic levels fall into a relatively narrow range
and the NOECs predicted for 2,6-DTBP are well inside this range.
PNEC calculation based on newly generated aquatic toxicity data using the EPM method
Calculation of PNEC for sediments or soil using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM)
To calculate PNEC for freshwater sediment, marine sediment and soil the guidance on how to do this is on Chapter R.10 and R.16.
The equations R.10-2, R.10-3, R.10-5 in ECHA guidance Chapter R.10
The equations use default values and data you have already on the substance.
PNECcomp= Kcomp-water/RHOcomp* PNECwater* 1000
where,
comp' = environmental compartment, e. g. freshwater sediment, marine sediment, suspended matter or soil;
PNECcomp= Predicted No Effect Concentration in wet comp, mg/kg of wet comp;
Kcomp-water= comp-water partitioning coefficient, m³/m³;
RHOcomp= bulk density of wet comp, kg/m³ (= 1150 given); and
PNECwater= Predicted No Effect Concentration in water (freshwater or marine), mg/L.
The unknown term in the above equation is the partitioning coefficient, Kcomp-water, which is derived from equation R.16-7 in ECHA guidance Chapter R.16:
Kcomp-water= Faircomp* Kair-water+ Fwatercomp+ Fsolidcomp* (Kpcomp/1000) * RHOsolid
where,
Faircomp= fraction of air in comp, m³/m³ -- only relevant for soil; Fairsoil= 0.2 m³-air/m³-soil, from Table R.16-9
Kair-water= air-water partitioning coefficient;
Fwatercomp= fraction of water in comp, m³/m³; Fwatersusp= 0.9 m³-water/m³-suspended matter, Fwatersed= 0.8 m³-water/m³-sediment, Fwatersoil= 0.2 m³-water/m³-soil, from Table R.16-9
Fsolidcomp= fraction of solids in comp, m³/m³; Fsolidsusp= 0.1 m³-soilds/m³-suspended matter, Fsolidsed= 0.2 m³-soilds/m³-sediment, Fsolidsoil = 0.6 m³-soilds/m³-soil, from Table R.16-9
Kpcomp= solids-water partitioning coefficient in comp, L/kg;
Kpcomp= Foccomp* Koc equation R.16-6
where,
Foccomp= weight fraction organic carbon in comp solids, kg-oc/kg-solids;
Focsusp= 0.1 kg-oc/kg-solid
Focsed= 0.05 kg-oc/kg-solid
Focsoil= 0.02 kg-oc/kg-solid
Koc = partitioning coefficient organic carbon-water (4493 L/kg -- from data set for the substance being registered)
RHOsolid= density of the solid phase, kg/m³ (= 2500 given).
Compartment |
PNECcomp |
Kcomp-water |
RHOcomp |
PNECwater |
Faircomp |
Kair-water |
Fwatercomp |
Fsolidcomp |
Kpcomp |
RHOsolid |
Foccomp |
Koc |
HLC |
v. p |
MW |
water solubility |
|
mg/kg of wet comp |
m3/m3 |
kg/m3 |
mg/L |
m3/m3 |
|
m3/m3 |
m3/m3 |
L/kg |
kg/m3 |
kg/kg |
|
Pa-m3/mole |
Pa |
g/mole |
mg/L |
freshwater sediment |
0.0689 |
113 |
1150 |
0.0007 |
NA |
NA |
0.9 |
0.1 |
477 |
2500 |
0.1 |
4493 |
|
|
|
|
marine sediment |
0.00689 |
113 |
1150 |
0.000070 |
NA |
NA |
0.9 |
0.1 |
477 |
2500 |
0.1 |
4493 |
|
|
|
|
soil |
0.0556 |
135 |
1150 |
0.0007 |
0.2 |
0.0145 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
95.4 |
2500 |
0.02 |
4493 |
34.3 |
1.01 |
206.33 |
4.11 |
PNECfreshwater= 0.0007 mg/L
PNECmarine water= 0.000070 mg/L
Koc = 4493
MW = 206.33
water solubility = 4.11 mg/L
vapour pressure = 1.01 Pa
PNECfreshwater wet sediment= 0.0689 mg/kg ww
PNECfreshwater dry sediment= 0.317 mg/kg dw
PNECmarine wet sediment= 0.00689 mg/kg ww
PNECmarine dry sediment= 0.0317 mg/kg dw
PNECwet soil= 0.0556 mg/kg ww
PNECdry soil= 0.063 mg/kg dw
Summary of Read Across approach and EPM results on sediment toxicity
Comparison of PNECdry soil:
Data base |
PNECdry soil |
Based on the terrestrial Read-Across data |
25.1 mg/kg soil dw. |
Based on a worst case the lowest experimental NOEC value for the analogues in the terrestrial Read-Across assessments (2 mg/kg soildw) |
0.2 mg/kg soil dw. |
Based on the new Daphnia magna reproduction test data (M.H.J. Migchielsen 2014, DAPHNIA MAGNA, REPRODUCTION TEST WITH 2,6-DI-TERT-BUTYLPHENOL (FLOW-THROUGH)) using the EPM method |
0.063 mg/kg dw |
The comparison of PNECdry soil values shows that using the Daphnia magna reproduction test data in combination with the EPM method leads to the lowest PNECdry soilvalue. The comparison with the respective value derived from the terrestrial Read-Across data clearly indicates that the former value is very conservative. Comparison with the experimentally derived PNEC soil (0.697 mg/L, using an AF of 10) show that the results obtained by the Read across approach (NOEC-data) and EPM-method would have been more conservative. However, these data are overruled by the experimental data newly generated upon request of ECHA.
The results from the read across approach and EPM method will not be used for the derivation of the PNEC soil since experimental data are available for the registered substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.