Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Endpoint summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Information on the genotoxic potential of sodium methanolate is limited to an in vitro mutagenicity test (Ames test, result: negative). Taken into account the available in vitro data on genotoxicity of the hydrolysis products methanol and sodium hydroxide, there were some ambiguous or positive results observed in different in vitro genotoxicity tests with methanol, which were further evaluated in vivo. However, the most of the available in vitro studies with methanol were negative. For sodium hydroxide there is no evidence for a mutagenic potential.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
only 3 strains testet (TA97, TA98, and TA100)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his operon
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 97
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: sterile distilled water
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Evaluation criteria:
a two fold increase in revertants compared to concurrent controls indicates a positive result
Statistics:
RF-test and regression analysis in case of a positive result
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
not applicable
Genotoxicity:
not determined
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
not applicable
Genotoxicity:
not determined
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not determined
Conclusions:
negative

Executive summary:

The test substance showed no mutagenicity in the three strains TA97, TA98, and TA100 in the absence and presence of rat liver S9 mix.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

The weight of evidence of all available data for the hydrolysis product methanol suggests that methanol is unlikely to have any relevant mutagenic activity. For sodium hydroxide there is also no evidence for a mutagenic potential. Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no concern with regard to a mutagenic activity for sodium methanolate.

 

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Information on the genotoxic potential of sodium methanolate is limited to an in vitro mutagenicity test (Ames test). The abiotic hydrolysis of sodium methanolate either in aqueous culture media of in vitro test systems or with tissue water results in the formation of methanol (CAS No.67-56-1) and sodium hydroxide (CAS No. 1310-73-2). The latter dissociate into the corresponding cations (Na+) and anions (OH-). Therefore, data of the hydrolysis products were taken into account for the hazard assessment of sodium methanolate (please refer to the endpoint summaries of sodium hydroxide and methanol for details).

 

In vitro

 

A limited GLP-Ames assay similar to OECD guideline 471 with sodium methanolate in only three strains of S. typhimurium TA 97, TA 98 and TA 100 with and without metabolic activation (S9 -mix) at concentrations up to 5000 μg/plate did not show any increase in revertants (Evonik, 1987).

 

Conclusion

No data on mutagenicity of sodium methanolate are available with the exception of one negative Ames assay with a limited number of strains. Due to the rapid hydrolysis of methanolates in in vitro test systems and tissue water in vivo, data for the hydrolysis products are relevant for methanolates as well. For sodium hydroxide there is no evidence for a mutagenic potential. Further testing on the in vitro genotoxicity of sodium hydroxide is considered scientifically unjustified due to the dominating effect of high pH. Testing at non-physiological pH might give false-positive responses, which means that the effect is of a methodical kind and not valid to assess the genotoxicity under realistic conditions. For methanol, the weight of evidence suggests that the substance is unlikely to have any relevant mutagenic activity. For further details please refer to the endpoint summaries of methanol and sodium hydroxide.

Therefore, it can be concluded that there is no concern with regard to a mutagenic activity of sodium methanolate.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available information on the genotoxic potential of sodium methanolate and its hydrolysis products methanol and sodium hydorxide is conclusive but not sufficient for classification according to CLP (1272/2008/EC) / UN-GHS.

.