Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 629-850-6 | CAS number: 1245638-61-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From March 31, 2010 to April 16, 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to standard guidelines in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.11 (Biodegradation: Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 8192 (Water quality - Test for inhibition of oxygen consumption by activated sludge for carbonaceous and ammonium oxidation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Since PETIA was hardly soluble in water, test concentrations were prepared separately in Milli-RO water (tap water purified by reverse osmosis; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass., USA).
Two 1 L test bottles were filled with 250 ml of test substance mixtures with initial loading rates of 200 mg/L. These mixtures were stirred in closed brown glass bottles for approximately 26 h. Subsequently, 16 ml synthetic sewage feed, 200 ml sludge and Milli-RO water up to 500 ml were added resulting in a loading rate of 100 mg/L (see also section 6.4). This loading rate was tested in duplicate. Optimal contact between the test substance and test organisms was ensured applying continuous aeration and stirring. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source: Municipal sewage treatment plant: ‘Waterschap de Maaskant', 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.
- Preparation of the sludge: The sludge was coarsely sieved, washed and diluted with ISO-medium. A small amount of sludge was weighed and dried overnight at ca. 105°C to determine the amount of suspended solids (3.8 and 3.6 g/L of sludge, as used for test 1 and 2, respectively). The pH was 8.2 and 7.9 on the day of testing, for experiments 1 and 2, respectively. The batch of sludge was used one day after collection; therefore 50 ml of synthetic sewage feed was added per litre of activated sludge at the end of the collection day. The sludge was kept aerated at test temperature until use. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- Oxygen consumption was measured and recorded for approximately 10 minutes afther the 3 hours exposure period
- Test temperature:
- Experiment 1: between 19.0 and 20.1°C
Experiment 2: between 19.4 and 20.3°C - pH:
- Experiment 1: 8.3-8.5
Experiment 2: 7.6-7.9 - Dissolved oxygen:
- Oxygen consumption:
Experiment 1:
Controls PETIA series: 56-62 mg O2/L/h
PETIA series: 46-60 mg O2/l/h
Experiment 2:
Controls PETIA series: 52-56 mg/ O2/l/h
PETIA series: 48-54 mg O2/l/h - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration: a loading rate of 100 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: All glass, approximately 300 ml oxygen bottles (measuring) and 1 L test bottles (exposure)
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Aeration: During exposure with clean, oil-free air.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 2
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2/ series
- Biomass loading rate:
Experiment 1: 1.52 g/L suspended solids in final test mixture
Experiment 2: 1.44 g/L suspended solids in final test mixture
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Tap-water purified by reverse osmosis (Milli-RO) and subsequently passed over activated carbon and ion-exchange cartridges (Milli-Q) (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass., USA).
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable)
The respiration rate from each vessel, in mg O2/L/h, was calculated from the linear part of the respiration curve, which was generally between 2.5 and 6.5 mg O2/L
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Test concentrations: Limit test at a loading rate of 100 mg/L. Since the difference between the duplicate values was significant the experiment was repeated. - Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 other: mg/L (loading rate)
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks:
- respiration rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Details on results:
- In the first experiment, no inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at 100 mg PETIA/L. In the duplicate measurement, inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge of 22% was recorded. Since the difference between the duplicate values was significant, the experiment was repeated.
In the second experiment, 11% inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at a loading rate of 100 mg PETIA/L. In the duplicate measurement no inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge was recorded. Therefore, no further testing was needed. Hence, the EC50 of PETIA exceeded a loading rate of 100 mg/L. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid: yes
- The EC50 of 3,5-dichlorophenol was in the accepted range of 5-30 mg/L (7.4 and 6.0 mg/L, for experiments 1 and 2, respectively.
The inhibitory effect of 3,5 Dichlorophenol on aerobic waste water (activated sludge) bacteria increased with increasing concentration, ranging from a 37% and 44% inhibition at 5,0 mg/L to 83% and 84% at 30 mg/L. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this present test, the 3h EC50 of the substance exceeded a loading rate of 100 mg/L. The NOEC was 100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the toxicity of PETIA to activated sludge according to OECD Guideline 209. In the first experiment, no inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at a nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L. In the duplicate measurement, an inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge of 22% was recorded. Since the difference between the duplicate values was significant, the experiment was repeated. Under the conditions of this study, the 3h EC50 of the substance exceeded a loading rate of 100 mg/L. The NOEC was 100 mg/L ( Desmares-Koopmans, 2010).
Reference
None
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
A study was conducted to determine the toxicity of PETIA to activated sludge according to OECD Guideline 209. In the first experiment, no inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge was recorded at a nominal loading rate of 100 mg/L. In the duplicate measurement, an inhibition of respiration rate of the sludge of 22% was recorded. Since the difference between the duplicate values was significant, the experiment was repeated. Under the conditions of this study, the 3h EC50 of the substance exceeded a loading rate of 100 mg/L. The NOEC was 100 mg/L ( Desmares-Koopmans, 2010).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.