Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 213-934-0 | CAS number: 1067-53-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay: for mutagenicity in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA (OECD Test Guideline 471) (BioReliance, 1999).
In vitro cytogenicity in mammalian cells: tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane was negative for clastogenicity in Chinese hamster ovary cells (OECD Test Guideline 473) (BioReliance, 2004).
In vitro gene mutation in mammalian cells: tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane was negative for mutagenicity in L5178 mouse lymphoma cells (OECD Test Guideline 476) (Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, 2010).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1999-07-09 to 1999-10-16
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 100, 333, 1000, 3333, and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Stability in solvent - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- all strains with activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 100 and TA 1535 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- E. coli WP2 uvrA without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA 98 without activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METABOLIC ACTIVATION
0.5 ml of S9 mix containing 10% Aroclor induced rat liver S9 with NADP as cofactor. The S9 was assayed for ability to metabolize 2-aminoanthracene and 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene to forms mutagenic to S. typhimurium TA100
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48-72 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48-72 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48-72 hours
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): not specified
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: concentrations were plated in triplicate, experiment was repeated
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 0.3 x 10E09 cells per ml
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: condition of bacterial lawn
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy:
- Determination of endoreplication:
OTHER: The study was performed in two phases, using the preincubation and plate incorporation methodology. The first phase, the preliminary toxicity study, was used to establish the dose range for the mutagenicity assay. The second phase, the mutagenicity assay (initial and independent repeat assays), was used to evaluate the mutagenic potential of the test article. - Evaluation criteria:
- A substance is considered positive if it causes a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain with a minimum of two increasing concnetrations of test substance, of greater than two times (TA 98, 100 and E. coli) or 3 times (TA 1535 and 1537) the vehicle control value.
- Statistics:
- No statistical evaluation carried out.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In an in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria, conducted accordig to OECD test guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane has been tested using S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA. No increase in the number of revertants was observed in any strain with or without metabolic activation, neither in the preliminary plate incorporation range-finding study nor in the initial and repeat preincubation assays. The substance was tested to limit concentrations and appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2003-10-08 to 2003-11-18
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 350 (toxicity test only), 700, 1400, 2801 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (dried before use)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: based on informatin from sponsor and compatibility with target cells. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 4 hours (with and without activation); 20 hours (without activation)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 20 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid added 2 hours before harvest.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giesma
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate cultures
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200 metaphase spreads were examined and scored for chromatid and chromosome-type aberrations
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cell count and percent viability
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: yes - Evaluation criteria:
- Test substances considered positive if it produced a statistically significant, dose-dependent increase relative to control in the percentage of cells with aberrrations, in excess of histroic solvent controls.
- Statistics:
- Fisher's exact test was used for pairwise comparison of treatment with control. If positive, Cochran-Armitage used to measure dose-responsiveness.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: in the preliminary toxicity assay, the maximum dose tested was 2801 µg/mL. The test substance was soluble in treatment medium at all dose levels tested. No substantial toxicity (more than or equal to 50% reduction in cell growth relative to the solvent control) was observed up to the highest test substance dose level in any treatment condition. Based on these findings, the dose levels for the chromosome aberration assay ranged from 350 to 2801 µg/mL for all three exposure groups.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: results were within the range of historical control data - Conclusions:
- In an in vitro chromosome aberration study, conducted according to OECD test guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane has been tested in a valid study. No increase in the number of cells with aberrations was observed at any concentration with and without metabolic activation when tested in Chinese hamster ovary cells up to limit concentrations. The expected results were obtained with solvent and positive controls. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosomal aberrations under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital, beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 187.5-3000 µg/mL with and without activation
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: the solvent was chosen according to its solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity to the cells. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- 13.0 - 19.5 µg/ml
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- 3.0 – 6.0 µg/ml
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION: phenobarbital, beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9, NADP and glucose-6-phosphate as cofactor. Concentration in final test medium: 5%
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 4 hours (with and without activation), 24 hours (without activation)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-15 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours
SELECTION AGENT: selective medium with TFT
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate controls and test concentrations, duplicate microtiter plates for mutant selection and viability determination
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 x 10E06 cells/flask treated; 4 x 10E03 cells per well of microtiter plates for mutant selection; 2 cells per well for viability assessment.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if the induced mutation frequency is reproducibly dose dependant and exceeds a threshold of 126 colonies per 10E06 cells above the corresponding solvent control. Results rejected if the relative total growth is less than 10% of the vehicle control unless unless the exception criteria specified by the IWGT recommendations are fulfilled.
- Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) comparison of number of mutant colonies from treated and solvent control groups was used to assess dose dependence. Biological relevance was considered alongside statistical significance.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In an in vitro mammalian mutagenicity study, conducted according to OECD test guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP, tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane has been tested in a valid study. No increase in the number of mutants was detected either with or without metabolic activation in either of the cultures of mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells at any dose up to limit concentrations. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of this test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Preliminary Toxicity Test: Ten dose levels, ranging from 6.7
to 5000 ug/plate were tested with the four Salmonella
strains and WP2 uvrA in the presence or absence of S9.
Neither precipitate nor appreciable toxicity was observed.
No positive responses were observed in the
mutagenicity assays. Neither precipitate nor appreciable
toxicity was observed. All bacterial strains exhibited
mutagenic responses to the positive control substances,
indicating that the tests were sensitive and valid.
Table 1: Preincubation experiment 1: Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Concentration µg/plate |
Strain TA 98 |
Strain TA 100 |
Strain TA 1535 |
Strain TA 1537 |
E. coli WP2 uvrA |
|||||
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
|
0* |
16 |
21 |
137 |
134 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
12 |
17 |
100 |
12 |
18 |
146 |
122 |
11 |
14 |
5 |
6 |
15 |
16 |
333 |
11 |
16 |
141 |
154 |
9 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
15 |
15 |
1000 |
13 |
17 |
141 |
161 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
16 |
15 |
3333 |
12 |
11 |
134 |
159 |
12 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
16 |
16 |
5000 |
12 |
15 |
135 |
147 |
9 |
7 |
7 |
5 |
19 |
17 |
Positive control |
745 |
416 |
700 |
611 |
420 |
100 |
229 |
78 |
371 |
173 |
* Solvent control with DMSO
Table 2: Preincubation experiment 2: Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
Concentration µg/plate
|
Strain TA 98 |
Strain TA 100 |
Strain TA 1535 |
Strain TA 1537 |
E. coli WP2 uvrA |
|||||
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
- MA |
+ MA |
|
0* |
14 |
16 |
104 |
131 |
13 |
12 |
9 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
100 |
14 |
15 |
112 |
136 |
10 |
13 |
10 |
9 |
15 |
12 |
333 |
13 |
17 |
127 |
143 |
13 |
12 |
9 |
9 |
16 |
13 |
1000 |
14 |
16 |
108 |
147 |
13 |
11 |
6 |
8 |
13 |
14 |
3333 |
11 |
14 |
111 |
123 |
11 |
12 |
6 |
9 |
15 |
14 |
5000 |
12 |
17 |
109 |
153 |
13 |
13 |
5 |
7 |
12 |
14 |
Positive control |
480 |
400 |
620 |
617 |
294 |
68 |
51 |
68 |
282 |
91 |
* Solvent control with DMSO
Due to a lack of substantial toxicity, the
highest dose level selected for microscopic analysis was the
maximum dose selected for chromosome aberration. The
percentage of cells with structural or numerical aberrations
in the test substance groups was not significantly different
than the solvent control.
Table 1 Results of chromosome aberrations
analysis, 4 hour treatment without activation
Treatment (µg/ml) |
S9 Activation |
Treatment time |
Mean Mitotic Index |
Cells With Aberrations |
|
Numerical (%) |
Structural (%) |
||||
0 (DMSO) |
- |
4 |
10.1 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
700 |
- |
4 |
9.4 |
2 |
0 |
1400 |
- |
4 |
9.6 |
2 |
2 |
2801 |
- |
4 |
8.5 |
1.5 |
1 |
Positive control 0.2 |
- |
4 |
10.7 |
2.5 |
10.0** |
Table 2 Results of chromosome aberrations analysis, 4 hour treatment with activation
Treatment (µg/ml) |
S9 Activation |
Treatment time |
Mean Mitotic Index |
Cells With Aberrations |
|
0 (DMSO) |
+ |
4 |
9.9 |
3.5 |
10.0** |
700 |
+ |
4 |
10.7 |
4 |
1.5 |
1400 |
+ |
4 |
9.2 |
3 |
0 |
2801 |
+ |
4 |
10.5 |
5 |
1.5 |
Positive control 10 |
+ |
4 |
8.8 |
3 |
33.0** |
Table 3 Results of chromosome aberrations analysis, 20 hour treatment without activation
Treatment (µg/ml) |
S9 Activation |
Treatment time |
Mean Mitotic Index |
Cells With Aberrations |
|
0 (DMSO) |
- |
20 |
7.8 |
3 |
0 |
700 |
- |
20 |
7.6 |
2 |
0.5 |
1400 |
- |
20 |
9 |
6.5 |
0.5 |
2801 |
- |
20 |
9 |
6.5 |
0.5 |
Positive control 0.1 |
- |
20 |
9.9 |
2.5 |
9.5** |
**
Table 1 - Experiment I / 4 h treatment
|
Concentration µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
Column |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
Culture I |
Culture II |
|||||
Solvent control with DMSO |
|
- |
100.0 |
170 |
296 |
100 |
206 |
332 |
Positive control with MMS |
19.5 |
- |
42.6 |
477 |
296 |
70.9 |
379 |
332 |
Test item |
93.8 |
- |
culture was not continued# |
culture was not continued# |
||||
Test item |
187.5 |
- |
208.9 |
167 |
296 |
108.6 |
220 |
332 |
Test item |
375.0 |
- |
160.4 |
213 |
296 |
104.9 |
215 |
332 |
Test item |
750.0 |
- |
101.9 |
174 |
296 |
83.9 |
267 |
332 |
Test item |
1500.00 |
- |
112.8 |
205 |
296 |
125.4 |
188 |
332 |
Test item |
3000.0 |
- |
173.5 |
167 |
296 |
142.0 |
155 |
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solvent control with DMSO |
|
+ |
100.0 |
144 |
270 |
100.0 |
198 |
324 |
Positive control with CPA |
3.0 |
+ |
59.6 |
374 |
270 |
84.0 |
229 |
324 |
Positive control with CPA |
4.5 |
+ |
45.4 |
453 |
270 |
10.8 |
739 |
324 |
Test item |
93.8 |
+ |
culture was not continued# |
culture was not continued# |
||||
Test item |
187.5 |
+ |
91.1 |
278 |
270 |
124.8 |
175 |
324 |
Test item |
375.0 |
+ |
94.9 |
240 |
270 |
122.8 |
170 |
324 |
Test item |
750.0 |
+ |
95.4 |
245 |
270 |
113.8 |
164 |
324 |
Test item |
1500.0 |
+ |
118.4 |
212 |
270 |
98.4 |
186 |
324 |
Test item |
3000.0 |
+ |
111.1 |
221 |
270 |
93.6 |
167 |
324 |
Threshold = number of mutant colonies per 10x6 cells of each solvent plus 126
# culture was not continued since a minimum of four concentrations is required by the guidelines
Table 2 - Experiment II / 24 h treatment
|
Concentration µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
|
Column |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
|
Culture I |
Culture II |
||||||
Solent. control with DMSO |
|
- |
100.0 |
169 |
295 |
100.0 |
143 |
269 |
|
Positive control with MMS |
13.0 |
- |
10.1 |
333 |
295 |
6.7 |
303 |
269 |
|
Test item |
93.8 |
- |
culture was not continued# |
culture was not continued# |
|||||
Test item |
187.5 |
- |
126.7 |
168 |
295 |
83.5 |
136 |
269 |
|
Test item |
375.0 |
- |
130.5 |
156 |
295 |
66.2 |
144 |
269 |
|
Test item |
750.0 |
- |
108.1 |
124 |
295 |
80.5 |
161 |
269 |
|
Test item |
1500.0 |
- |
95.5 |
165 |
295 |
82.2 |
142 |
269 |
|
Test item |
3000.0 |
- |
95.9 |
108 |
295 |
60.9 |
136 |
269 |
Threshold = number of mutant colonies per 10x6 cells of each solvent plus 126
# culture was not continued since a minimum of four concentrations is required by the guidelines
Table 3 - Experiment II / 4 h treatment
|
Concentration µg/ml |
S9 mix |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
Relative total growth |
Mutant colonies/10x6 cells |
Threshold |
Positive control with CPA |
3 |
+ |
45.2 |
289 |
268 |
44.1 |
197 |
230 |
Positive control with CPA |
4.5 |
+ |
29.9 |
326 |
268 |
26 |
308 |
230 |
Test item |
93.8 |
+ |
culture was not continued# |
culture was not continued# |
||||
Test item |
187.5 |
+ |
98.9 |
154 |
268 |
85.9 |
130 |
230 |
Test item |
375.00 |
+ |
86.2 |
163 |
268 |
88.9 |
141 |
230 |
Test item |
750.00 |
+ |
72.5 |
162 |
268 |
106.3 |
109 |
230 |
Test item |
1500.00 |
+ |
84.3 |
196 |
268 |
69.1 |
201 |
230 |
Test item |
3000.00 |
+ |
127.5 |
168 |
268 |
68.5 |
178 |
230 |
Threshold = number of mutant colonies per 10x6 cells of each solvent plus 126
# culture was not continued since a minimum of four concentrations is required by the guidelines
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In vivo testing is not required as the results of all the in vitro studies were negative.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
In a bacterial reverse mutation assay, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane was tested using S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA. No increase in the number of revertants was observed in any strain with or without metabolic activation, neither in the preliminary plate incorporation range-finding study nor in the initial and repeat preincubation assays. The substance was tested to limit concentrations and appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test (Bioreliance, 1999).
In a supporting in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, no increase in the number of revertants per plate was observed with or without activation. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test (Microtest Research, 1988).
In a supporting in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP, the test substance was negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test (Hüls, 1993).
In an in vitro cytogenicity study in mammalian cells, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP, no increase in the number of cells with aberrations was observed at any concentration with and without metabolic activation when tested in Chinese hamster ovary cells up to limit concentrations. The expected results were obtained with solvent and positive controls. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosomal aberrations under the conditions of the test (BioReliance, 2004).
In an in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 476 but not in compliance with GLP, no increase in the number of mutants was detected either with or without metabolic activation in either of the cultures of mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells at any dose up to limit concentrations. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of this test (Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, 2010).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data tris(2-methoxyethoxy)vinylsilane does not require classification for genotoxicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.