Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-176-6 | CAS number: 68516-73-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- BASF SE Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- EC Number:
- 271-176-6
- EC Name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 68516-73-4
- Molecular formula:
- C34H32N6O12
- IUPAC Name:
- tetramethyl 2,2'-{1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1,3-dioxobutane-2,1-diyl)diazene-2,1-diyl]}diterephthalate
- Test material form:
- solid
- Details on test material:
- Batch DEB2146870
Test material fulfills criteria of a nanomaterial accoring to the EU (information by Sponsor, no further details available).
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Lot/batch No.: DEB2 146870
- Stability under test conditions: The stability of the test substance under storage conditions over the test period was guaranteed by the manufacturer, and the manufacturer holds this responsibility.
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH
- Age at study initiation: (P) 10-11 wks
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: individually
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Pigment Yellow 155 was applied as a suspension. To prepare this suspension, the appropriate amount of test substance was weighed out depending on the desired concentration. Then, drinking water was filled up to the desired volume, subsequently released with a high speed homogenizer. During administration of the test substance, preparations were kept homogeneous by stirring with a magnetic stirrer. The test substance preparations were produced at least once a week.
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 1, 3, or 10 g/100mL, respectively - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: maximum of two weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: indiviually - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- males treated 41 days (pre-mating, post-mating)
females treated 52 days (pre-mating, gestation, 4 days lactation) - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once daily
- Cage side observations checked: any signs of morbidity, pertinent behavioral changes and signs of overt toxicity, littering and lactation behavior of the dams, parturition behavior of the dams
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: prior to the administration period and thereafter at weekly intervals
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Before the start of the administration period. During the administration period body weight was determined on study day 0 (start of the administration period) and thereafter once a week at the same time of the day (in the morning).
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
Food consumption was determined once a week for male and female parental animals, except during mating period, during gestation.
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: No
OTHER: Functional observational battery was performed in the first five parental males and females (with litter) per group at the end of the administration period. The motor activity assessment (MA) was carried out in the first five parental males and females (with litter) per group at the end of the administration period. - Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: no
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring:
number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was not determined for pups born or found dead. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals: Males approximately one week post-mating and females after 4 days of lactation and two weeks thereafter.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Histopathology: All gross lesions, Adrenal glands, Bone marrow (femur), Brain, Cecum, Cervix, Coagulating glands, Colon, Duodenum, Epididymides, Heart, Ileum, Jejunum, Kidneys, Liver, Lung, Lymph nodes (mesenteric and axillary lymph nodes), Ovaries, Oviducts, Peyer’s patches, Prostate, Rectum, Sciatic nerve, Seminal vesicles, Spinal cord (cervical, thoracic and lumbar cords), Spleen, Stomach (forestomach and glandular stomach), Testes, Thymus, Thyroid glands, Trachea, Urinary bladder, Uterus, Vagina
Organn weights: Epididymides, Testes, Adrenal glands, Brain, Heart, Kidneys, Liver, Spleen, Thymus - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring at 4 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic examination) as follows: All pups without notable findings or abnormalities were discarded after their macroscopic evaluation. Animals with notable findings or abnormalities were evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending on the type of finding noted.
GROSS NECROPSY
- All pups were examined externally and eviscerated; their organs were assessed macroscopically. - Statistics:
- Food consumption (parental animals), body weight and body weight change (parental animals and pups; for the pup weights, the litter means were used), number of mating days, duration of gestation, number of implantation sites, postimplantation loss and % postimplantation loss, number of pups delivered per litter where analysed by simultaneous com-parison of all dose groups with the control group using the DUNNETT-test (two-sided) for the hypothesis of equal means.
Male and female mating indices, male and female fertility indices, gestation index, females with liveborn pups, females with stillborn pups, females with all stillborn pups, live birth index, pups stillborn, pups died, pups cannibalized, pups sacrificed moribund, viability index, number of litters with affected pups at necropsy where analysed by pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group using FISHER'S EXACT test for the hypothesis of equal proportions.
Proportions of affected pups per litter with necropsy observations where analysed by pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group using the WILCOXON-test (one-sided) for the hypothesis of equal medians.
Feces, rearing, grip strength of forelimbs and hindlimbs, landing foot-splay test, motor activity where analysed by non-parametric one-way analysis using KRUSKAL-WALLIS test (two-sided). If the resulting p-value was equal or less than 0.05, a pairwise comparison of each dose group with the control group was performed using WILCOXON-test (two-sided) for the equal medians. - Reproductive indices:
- Male mating index, male fertility index, female mating index, female fertility index, gestation index, live birth index, post implantation loss
- Offspring viability indices:
- Viability index
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- yellow discolored feces, no mortality
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- except the body weight in male animals was significantly decreased in test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/d) on post-mating day 0 (-4.4%)
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- except the body weight in male animals was significantly decreased in test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/d) on post-mating day 0 (-4.4%)
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Details on results (P0)
BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION (PARENTAL ANIMALS): Mean body weights and mean body weight gain of the F0 males in test groups 1-3 (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d) were comparable to the concurrent control throughout the entire study period. Except the body weight in male animals was significantly decreased in test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/d) on post-mating day 0 (-4.4%). Mean body weight and mean body weight gain of the F0 females in test groups 1-3 (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d) were comparable to the concurrent control throughout the entire premating, gestation and lactation periods.
TEST SUBSTANCE INTAKE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): Food consumption of the male and female F0 generation parental animals in all test substance-treated groups (100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/d) was comparable to the concurrent control group during the entire study period, covering premating, gestation and lactation.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): For all F0 parental males, which were placed with females to generate F1 pups, copulation was confirmed. Thus, the male mating index was 100% in all groups including the controls. Fertility was proven for most of the F0 parental males within the scheduled mating interval to produce F1 litter. Two males of test group 1 (Nos. 12, 20 mated with females Nos. 112, 120) did not generate F1 pups.
The male fertility index ranged between 80% and 100% (see Tab. 1).
The apparently infertile male animals Nos. 12 and 20 (test group 1; 100 mg/kg bw/d) were not examined histopathologically.
These findings reflected the normal range of biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this study as all respective values were within the range of the historical control data.
The female mating index calculated after the mating period for F1 litter was 100% in all test groups. The mean duration until sperm was detected (GD 0) was 3.2, 3.8, 2.9 and 4.2 days in test groups 0-3. These findings reflected the normal range of biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this study as all respective values were within the range of the historical control data. All sperm positive rats delivered pups with the exception of females Nos. 112 and 120 (test group 1), which were mated with male Nos. 12 and 20 did not become pregnant. The female fertility index varied between 80% and 100% (Table 1). Female animals Nos. 112 and 120, which delivered no pups, showed no implantation sites. The mean duration of gestation was similar in all test groups (i.e. between 22.0 and 22.3 days). The gestation index was 100% in all test groups.
The rate of liveborn pups was also not affected by the test substance, as indicated by live birth indices of 99.0% in test group 1, 99.1% in test group 3 and 99.2% in control and test group 2. Moreover, the number of stillborn pups was comparable between the groups. The postimplantation loss was 2.3% in test group 0, 0.98% in test group 1, 5.6% in test group 2 and 6.5% in test group 3. These findings reflected the normal range of biological variation inherent in the strain of rats used for this study as all respective values were within the range of the historical control data.
ORGAN WEIGHTS (PARENTAL ANIMALS): The weight decrease in absolute epididymis and liver weight in males of test group 2 (300 mg/kg bw/day) was regarded to be incidental due to a missing dose response relationship and missing histopathologic findings in test group 3 (1000 mg/kg bw). The decrease in thymus weights of females in test group 3 (1000 mg/kg bw/day) was also regarded to be incidental as no histopathologic correlate could explain the weight decrease.
All other mean weight parameters did not show significant differences when compared to the control groups.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS):Several animals of test group 3 (1000 mg/kg bw) revealed a yellow discoloration of the contents of the glandular stomach, small and large intestines. These findings are regarded to be treatment related.
Each one male and female of test groups 1 and 2 (100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day) (animals No. 12, 21, 111, 125) revealed either some or all of the following findings: deposition or foci on the lung, deposition on the diaphragm, discoloration and enlargement of the mediastinal lymph nodes, deposition on the thymus, and deposition on the sternum. All these findings were regarded to be treatment related by gavage errors.
All other gross lesions noted were single observations and they were regarded to have developed spontaneously and unrelated to compound and treatment.
HISTOPATHOLOGY (PARENTAL ANIMALS): The discoloration of the content in the digestive tract was regarded to be a consequence to the oral intake of the test substance which is of yellow color. Therefore, the gross findings in the remaining animals were not investigated in addition.
The discoloration and depositions described for animals No. 12, 21, 111, 125 in several organs of the thoracic cavity were multifocal granulomas with intrahistiocytically located yellow particles, interpreted as test substance. The granulomas were foreign body reactions interpreted as a consequence to a gavage error. The discoloration of the mediastinal lymph nodes was regarded to be the physiologic clearing route of the lung. Particles that were located intraalveolar were transported via macrophages to the regional lymph nodes and caused there the activation of the lymph nodes and the discoloration. Therefore these depositions and discolorations were caused by the test substance due to a gavage error and were not regarded to be an adverse finding.
All other findings noted were either single observations or they were biologically equally distributed between control and treatment group. All of them were considered to be incidental or spontaneous in origin and without any relation to treatment.
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: fertility
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: systemic toxicity
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
Details on results (F1)
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING): The surviving F1 pups of any test group did not show adverse clinical signs up to scheduled sacrifice on PND 4.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING): Mean pup body weights/pup body weight changes of all pups in all test groups were comparable to the control group.
One female runt was seen in test group 0. One male and six female runts were seen in test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/d); 1 female runt was seen in test group 3 (1000 mg/kg bw/d).
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING): Respectively one male F1 pup of test group 2 (300 mg/kg bw/d) and test group 3 (1000 mg/kg bw/d) showed post mortem autolysis at gross necropsy. Two female pups of test group 1 (100 mg/kg bw/d) were cannibalized. This finding was assessed as being spontaneous in nature and without biological relevance.
OTHER FINDINGS (OFFSPRING): The sex distribution and sex ratios of live F1 pups on the day of birth and PND 4 did not show substantial differences between the control and the test substance-treated groups; slight differences were regarded to be spontaneous in nature (for details see table 2).
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 10: Fertility index
|
Test group (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||
Test groups (mg/kg bw/day |
0 (0) |
1 (100) |
2 (300) |
3 (1000) |
Male fertility index [%] |
100 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
Female fertility index [%] |
100 |
80 |
100 |
100 |
Table 11: Sex ratio of live F1 pups
PND 0 |
Test group 0 |
Test group 1 |
Test group 2 |
Test group 3 |
Live males [%] |
40.3 |
50.0 |
50.4 |
57.4 |
Live females [%] |
59.7 |
50.0 |
49.6 |
42.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
PND 4 |
|
|
|
|
Live males [%] |
40.3 |
51.0 |
50.4 |
57.4 |
Live females [%] |
59.7 |
49.0 |
49.6 |
42.6 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.