Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-176-6 | CAS number: 68516-73-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Specific investigations: other studies
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- biochemical or cellular interactions
- Remarks:
- in vitro alveolar macrophage assay
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 021
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test material was incubated with Rat NR8383 alveolar macrophages in protein-free culture medium. Lactate dehydrogenase, glucuronidase, and tumour necrosis factor alpha were assessed after 16 h. In parallel, H2O2 was assessed after 1.5 h.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of method:
- in vitro
- Endpoint addressed:
- other: membrane disruption and activation of alveolar macrophages
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- EC Number:
- 271-176-6
- EC Name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 68516-73-4
- Molecular formula:
- C34H32N6O12
- IUPAC Name:
- tetramethyl 2,2'-{1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1,3-dioxobutane-2,1-diyl)diazene-2,1-diyl]}diterephthalate
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform, no surface treatment
- Details on test material:
- - State of aggregation:
- Particle size distribution:
- Shape of particles:
- Surface area of particles: BET = 46.3 m2/g
- Crystal structure: crystalline
- Coating: none
- Batch: 13007010
- solid yellow
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source of test material: BASF Colours and Effects GmbH
yellow solid
storage at room temperature
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Particles were dispersed according to the NanoGenotox protocol which uses small amounts of serum albumin to stabilize non-polar particles: A total of 15.36 mg of the dry powder was weighed into 20 mL glass vials, wetted with 30 μL ethanol, then mixed with 6 mL double distilled water containing 0.05% bovine serum albumin. Thus, the stock suspension contained 2.56 mg particles/mL, 0.5% (vol/vol) ethanol, and 0.05% bovine serum albumin. The stock suspension was ultrasonicated for 16 min with a Branson 450D sonifier. For experiments the stock suspension was mixed with one volume of double concentrated KRPG buffer or double concentrated F12-K medium, to achieve a physiological medium composition needed for the testing of cytotoxicity and cellular H2O2 generation, respectively. The resulting suspension was serially diluted in serum-free F12-K medium to obtain concentrations of 180, 90, 45 and 22.5 μg/mL. The suspension was also serially diluted in KRPG buffer, first to obtain 360, 180, 90, and 45 μg/mL; 100 μL of these suspensions were then added to cells covered with 100 μL of KRPG, to achieve the final test concentrations of 180, 90, 45 and 22.5 μg/mL.
Test animals
- Species:
- other: NR8383 cells (alveolar macrophage cell line derived from rat lung lavage cells)
Administration / exposure
- Vehicle:
- other: F-12K medium and KRPG buffer (depending on the respective investigation)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 16 h (for the determination of LDH, GLU, and TNF-α release); 1.5 h (for the determination of H2O2 formation)
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 22.5 other: µg/mL
- Dose / conc.:
- 45 other: µg/mL
- Dose / conc.:
- 90 other: µg/mL
- Dose / conc.:
- 180 other: µg/mL
- Details on study design:
- - Rat NR8383 cells, routinely cultured in F-12K medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/10 mg/mL) and 15 % (v/v) fetal calf serum in 500 mL flasks under standard cell culture conditions (37 °C; 5 % CO2) and passaged once a week, were detached from the substrate by mechanical agitation, dispersed by pipetting, seeded into 96-well plates at 3 × 10^5 live cells per well and incubated in F-12K medium supplemented with 5 % FCS for 24 h. For test material application, supernatants were withdrawn, and test material-containing phenol red-free F-12K medium, supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 100 U/100 μg/mL penicillin/streptomycin, was applied onto the cells.
- To correct for test material-specific adsorption and/or scattering of light, cell-free test material-containing controls were included in all test runs for all dilution steps.
- Cells were incubated with the test substance for 16 or 1.5 h. For the determination of LDH, GLU, and TNF-α release, cell culture supernatants were sampled after 16 h of incubation. In a parallel approach, supernatants were sampled after 1.5 h of incubation to assess H2O2 formation.
The stock solution of the test material prepared in F-12K medium was tested for contamination with viable bacteria and/or fungi. For this purpose, 50 μl of the aqueous suspension was plated onto a conventional maltose and a casein peptone agar. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 h and inspected for colonies of microorganisms after 24, 48 and 72 h.
Composition of KRPG-buffer was NaCl (129 mM), KCl (4.86 mM), CaCl2 (1.22 mM), NaH2PO4 (15.8 mM), glucose (5.5 mM), pH 7.3-7.4.
Examinations
- Examinations:
- - Parameters examined: cellular release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), β-glucuronidase (GLU) as indicators of membran disruption and macrophage activation; bioactive TNF-α as indicator of pro-inflammatory reactions; H2O2 as indicator of oxidative stress induction
- The lowest concentration at which significant effects were recorded for a given endpoint-specific test result was termed in vitro LOAEC.
- To convert the mass-based test material concentrations into surface area-based concentrations (mm²/mL), the applied mass concentrations (μg/mL) were multiplied with the respective test material’s surface area (m²/g). - Positive control:
- Quartz DQ12
Corundum (AL2O3) served as negative control
Results and discussion
- Details on results:
- Under cell culture conditions, i.e. in F-12K medium, the H2O dispersed material showed a slight increase (approximately 15 % of the mode value) in hydrodynamic diameter (Table 1) indicating some agglomeration. Importantly, there was a layer of micron-sized agglomerates/aggregates at the bottom of the cell culture vials (see Figure ). The size of these aggregates/agglomerates was mostly <5 μm. The density of these settled agglomerates, which are not included in the PTA measurements, correlated with the administered concentration. The majority of the settled aggregates/agglomerates was engulfed by NR8383 cells most of which bore colored inclusions. At the highest concentration many particles were not engulfed at the end of the incubation period and were found among the cells (Figure, bottom right).
In vitro toxicity data
Control cells reacted as expected: non-particle treated, or LPS-treated cells (a control for TNF induction) were undamaged. Corundum treated cells were particle-laden but undamaged. Quartz DQ12 treated cells were particle laden and appeared granular and partly deteriorated.
NR8383 cells exposed to the test material largely cleared the settled fraction of particles from the bottom of the culture wells up to a concentration of 180 μg/mL, except for some small particle aggregates/agglomerates. However, colored inclusions within the cells indicated a successful uptake of the main particle fraction (see Figure, bottom).
Effects on the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), glucuronidase (GLU), H2O2 and TNFα are shown in Table 2. All values and standard deviations (SD) from three independent experiments are summarized in Table 2.
The test material elicited minor effects on the release of LDH at 180 μg/mL. There were no effects on the release of either GLU, TNFα, or H2O2 from NR8383 macrophages.
The gravitationally settled fraction of the test material up to a concentration of 180 μg/mL was largely ingested by alveolar macrophages (NR8383 cells), except for small aggregates/agglomerates at the highest concentration.
There were minor cytotoxic effects at the highest concentration only (LDH). Neither activating (GLU), nor pro-inflammatory effects (TNFα) were observed up to 180 μg/mL.
There was no induction of H2O2 release up to 180 μg/mL.
According to the active/passive classification criteria of Wiemann et al. 2016, the substance was classified as passive.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Hydrodynamic diameter (nm) of the test material in H2O, KRPG and F-12K-medium after dispersion according to the NanoGenotox protocol
mg/L | average | ± SEM | average | ± SEM | average | ± SEM | average | ± SEM | average | ± SEM | |
H20 | 12.8 | 170 | 6.3 | 126.2 | 4.9 | 97.5 | 01. Jan | 146.3 | 4.2 | 266.1 | 19 |
F-12K | 6.4 | 192.1 | 2.5 | 141.4 | 5.2 | 112.2 | 1.4 | 160.7 | 4.2 | 311.3 | 13.5 |
KRPG | 6.4 | 213.3 | 5.7 | 159.3 | 4.3 | 127.1 | 1.9 | 188.1 | 10 | 326 | 9.8 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.