Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 249-204-3 | CAS number: 28768-32-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The acute toxicity of the substance is is low, the substance seems to be slowly absorbed by all routes and metabolized efficiently by epoxide hydrolases. The acute oral toxicity in rats (LD50) is greater 5000 mg/kg body weight, the acute dermal toxicity in rabbits is >3000 mg/kg body weight, and the acute inhalation toxicity in rats (LC50)was measured to be >30 mg/m3 air (highest valour concentration to be achieved technically).
At all routes of exposure no signs of toxicity were recorded. Only during the oral test with a dose of 10'000 mg/kg body weight 1/2 animals died without any adverse effects observed during necropsy.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1982
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No GLP, but according to guideline OECD 401
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- other: limit test
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Tif:MAG (SPF)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- 4-5 week old mice, the mice were kept in groups of 2, in Macrolon cages type 2, with standarized soft wood bedding.
The animal room was air conditioned at 22 +/-3 °C, a relative humidity of 55 +/- 15%, a 12-hour light/dark cycle, and approximately 15 air changes per hour. Mouse standard food and water was supplied ad libitum. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- polyethylene glycol
- Details on oral exposure:
- -rior to dosing the animals were fasted over night.
- Doses:
- males and females were exposed to 5000 mg/kg body weight (single application)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males and 5 females
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- Observation for mortality was on every day, mortality was checked daily, and body weight was determined on days 1, 7, 14, and at death
- Statistics:
- LD50 calculated including 95% confidence limits by the logit method (J. Berkson, J. Am. Stat. Ass. 39, 357 - 365 (1944)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Mortality:
- 1/5 male mice died after 24 hours, no female mouse died at all (0/5)
- Clinical signs:
- other: sedation, dyspnoera, ruffeld fur, curved body position were the only symptoms observed, they disappeared on day 11 completely.
- Gross pathology:
- no gross pathological findings were recorded.
- Interpretation of results:
- practically nontoxic
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The oral LD50 in mice is > 5000 mg/kg body weight with only one dead male mouse.
- Executive summary:
The oral LD50 in mice is > 5000 mg/kg body weight with only one dead male mouse.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1973
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Non-GLP study performed without analytical measurements.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Vapour generated by an air-stream was passed through a inhalation chamber in which rats were exposed (whole body exposure) to the vapour stream for 4 hours. Observation was for 14 days post exposure.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- fixed concentration procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Charles River albino rats
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Younf male and female rats (average weight 209 gm) were checked for health before entering the test. Animals were housed individually , and food and water was supplied ad libitum.
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- other: unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- Exposure was in a 70l plexiglass chamber in which all rats were exposed by whole-body-exposure.
Cold air (-40°C) was passed through the test substance at a flow rate of 4.9 l/min, at a pressure of 29.92 inches of Hg at 25°C.
The average nominal vspour conc. was 30 mg/m3 air . This was the highest technically achievable concentration. - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of exposure:
- >= 4 h
- Concentrations:
- 30 mg/m3 air (average)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 ales and 5 females
- Control animals:
- yes
- Statistics:
- no statistics was applied
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 30 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: whole body exposure
- Mortality:
- no mortality occurred during the exposure and during the 14-day observation period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: no substance-related clinical signs were recorded.
- Body weight:
- body weight development was equal to that of the air control group.
- Gross pathology:
- Compared to the control group, a slight discoloration of the liver of all treated animals was observed.
- Other findings:
- none
- Interpretation of results:
- relatively harmless
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- under the conditions of the test (30 mg/ MY720 per m3 air, for 4 hours) no signs of toxicity were recorded during the 14-day observation period.
The concentration used was the highest technically achievable concentration with this compound.
The LC50 is > 30 mg/m3 air as no mortality occurred and no adverse effects were noted. - Executive summary:
under the conditions of the test (30 mg/ MY720 per m3 air, for 4 hours) no signs of toxicity were recorded during the 14-day observation period. The concentration used was the highest technically achievable concentration with this compound. The LC50 is > 30 mg/m3 air as no mortality occurred and no adverse effects were noted.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 30 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1974
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No GLP, no Guideline , but method similar to what has been later written down in to the guidelines.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The rabbits were shaved on the back and 48 hours later substance was applied to the shaved area and wrapped semi-occlusively for 24 hours, then skin reactions were scored over a period of 14 days.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- All rabbits kept for seven days in quarantene before introducing to the test. Animals were housed individually, in suspended wire-mesh cages, food and water was supplied ad libitum.
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- other: methal ethyl ketone
- Details on dermal exposure:
- rabbits were shaved on the back 48 hours before treatment, substance was dissolved in methyl ethyl ketone, and applied to the backs of the animals (30% of the animals body surface), the substance was then covered with a plastic sheet and fixed with a bandage to the animal. Animals were fixed a plastic collar to avoid licking on the sites. Substance remained 24 hours on the site, then the sites were washed and animals were observed daily for skin reactions and mortality.
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 0, 1000, 3000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2 male & 2 female rabbits per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Initial and final body weights were measured, and at necropsy after 14 says a full observation of the entire organs was made, and organs were fixed in formalin for potential furhter investigations.
- Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed on the results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 3 000 mg/kg bw
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred during the 14 day observation period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Ataxia and hyporeactivity were observed in all animals 1 hour post treatment, but disappeared within 24 hours. MY 720 was slightly irritant to the skin, while the solvebt caused only marginal skin reactions (irritation).
- Gross pathology:
- No gross pathological changes were recorded during necropsy.
- Other findings:
- Histopathological examination of liver and kidney did not reveal any changes in the treated animals.
- Interpretation of results:
- practically nontoxic
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Dermal treatment of rabbits with 1000 and 3000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours did not cause any mortality or other sings of toxicity apart from slight irritation on the application sites.
The LD50 (dermal, in rabbits) is > 3000 mg/kg bw - Executive summary:
Dermal treatment of rabbits with 1000 and 3000 mg/kg body weight for 24 hours did not cause any mortality or other sings of toxicity apart from slight irritation on the application sites. The LD50 (dermal, in rabbits) is > 3000 mg/kg bw
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 3 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
The substance has been evaluated by using a read-across. The justification is given in a statement in Section 13. The substance is of low acute toxicity by all three routes of exposure, oral, dermal and inhalation. Several acute oral and dermal toxicity studies in rats and rabbits show a similar result: up to 3000 mg/kg body weight no specific signs of toxicity were recorded, and no death occurred. Only at 10'000 mg/kg body weight 1/2 rats died most likely due to test substance effects. The only acute inhalation study was performed with a single dose of 30 mg/m3 air; the dose was chosen as it is the highest technically achievable vapour concentration. TGMDA is of low vapour pressure, and thus, higher dose levels are technically impossible, and to test as droplet aerosols (liquid) would give a completely different exposure scenario. Nevertheless, under the experimental conditions of 30 mg/kg body weight (whole body exposure) the animals showed no sings of toxicity, indicating that 30 mg/m3 air is far below the NOEC .
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the oral and dermal LD50 determined, no classification is required.
Concering the acute inhalation toxicity, the situation is slightly more complex. The dose of 30 mg/m3 air is far below the dose which would not require classification and labelling. However, due to the fact that this technically the highest achievable concentration in air of the substance (due to low vapour pressure and due to tha fact that no solid inhalable dust aerosol is possible , no higher concentrations could be tested. Using a droplet-aerosol would have caused a situation of no inhalation but oral uptake as these droplet would have been absorbed in the nasal cavity and transported to the upper part of the intestinal tract.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.