Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-830-5 | CAS number: 75-00-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: dermal
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Reference
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March 1981 - June 1981
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 413 (Subchronic Inhalation Toxicity: 90-Day Study)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no clinical pathology performed; food and water consumption, organ weights (except liver) not determined; no monitoring of exposure conditions (e.g. test concentration)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: F344/N
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories (Portage, MI, USA)
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: males: 160 - 163 g; females: 124 g
- Housing: individually in stainless steel wire cages (Hazleton Systems, Inc., Aberdeen, MD, USA); no bedding
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): NIH 07 Rat and Mouse Ration (Zeigler Bros., Inc., Gardners, PA, USA); available ad libitum during non-exposure periods
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): automatic watering system (Edstrom Industries, Waterford, WI, USA); available ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 21 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.7 - 23.3
- Humidity (%): 40 - 65
- Air changes (per hr): 10 during exposure; 20 during non-exposure
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: February 1981 To: June 1981 - Route of administration:
- inhalation: gas
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- air
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: vapour generation system; the liquid to be vaporized was forced under pressure, at a metered rate, directly from the shipping container into a stainless steel boiler that was maintained at about 32 °C by a controlled-temperature water bath. The vapour was routed through a gas metering valve and a purge/expose valve into a pipe at the chamber inlet, where the vapour was mixed with dilution air entering the chamber. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 hours/day
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5 days/week for 13 weeks
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 500 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 6596 mg/m³
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 13192 mg/m³
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 000 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 26384 mg/m³
- Dose / conc.:
- 19 000 ppm (nominal)
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 50130 mg/m³
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: the absence of compound-induced mortality and toxic effects in a subacute study was the basis for selecting 19000 ppm as the highest exposure concentration in the 13-weeks studies.
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: 3 times per day during exposure
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once per week
FOOD CONSUMPTION:
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
WATER CONSUMPTION: No
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: No
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
OTHER: liver weight at necropsy - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (performed on all control and high dose animals)
Tissues examined include: adrenal glands, bone marrow, brain, colon, oesophagus, heart, jejunum, kidneys, larynx, liver, lungs and bronchi, mammary gland, mandibular lymph nodes, nasal cavity, pancreas, parathyroid glands, pituitary gland, prostate/testes or ovaries/uterus, salivary glands, skin, spleen, stomach, thymus, thyroid gland, trachea and urinary bladder. - Statistics:
- Survival analyses: estimated by the product-limit procedure of Kaplan and Meier (1985). Statistical analyses for a possible compound-related effect on survival used the method of Cox (1972). All reported P values for the survival analysis are two-sided.
Calculation of incidence: The incidence of neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions is given as the ratio of the number of animals bearing such lesions at a specific anatomic site to the number of animals in which that site was examined. - Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
All rats lived to the end of the study.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
The final mean body weights of rats exposed to 19000 ppm was 8% lower than that of controls for males and 4% lower for females. The limited change (<10%) was not considered to be toxicologically relevant.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
The liver weight to body weight ratio for male rats exposed to 19000 ppm was significantly greater than that for the controls (control: 38.3 +/-1.08; 19000 ppm: 43.5 +/- 0.78; P < 0.01). This is considered to be an adaptive response to the test substance exposure.
GROSS PATHOLOGY/HISTOPATHOLOGY:
No compound-related clinical signs or gross or microscopic pathologic effects were seen. - Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- 50 130 mg/m³ air (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: non-toxicologically relevant increased relative liver weights; reduced body weight
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- In a 13-week study, rats were exposed to 0, 2500, 5000, 10000, or 19000 ppm chloroethane. No compound-related deaths occurred in rats. The final mean body weight of rats exposed to 19000 ppm was 8% lower than that of controls for males and 4% lower for females. No compound-related clinical signs or gross or microscopic pathologic effects were seen in rats. The liver weight to body weight ratios for male rats exposed to 19000 ppm were greater than those for controls.
- Executive summary:
A thirteen-week study was conducted to evaluate the cumulative toxic effects of repeated whole body inhalation exposure to chloroethane and to determine the exposure concentrations to be used in a 2-year study (National Toxicology Program, 1989). Groups of 10 rats/sex were exposed to air containing chloroethane at target concentrations of 0, 2500, 5000, 10000, or 19000 ppm, 6 hours per day, 5 days per week for 13 weeks (65 exposures). Rats were observed three times per day. Individual animal weights were recorded once per week. At the end of the 13-week study, survivors were killed. A necropsy was performed on all animals. Histologic exams were performed on all control and high dose animals. Tissues examined included: adrenal glands, bone marrow, brain, colon, esophagus, heart, jejunum, kidneys, larynx, liver, lungs and bronchi, mammary gland, mandibular lymph nodes, nasal cavity, pancreas, parathyroid glands, pituitary gland, prostate/testes or ovaries/uterus, salivary glands, skin, spleen, stomach, thymus, thyroid gland, trachea, and urinary bladder; liver weighed at necropsy. Chamber concentrations were determined by GC-FID. All rats lived to the end of the study. The final mean body weights of all exposed groups were lower than those of controls; the final mean body weight of rats exposed to 19000 ppm was 8% lower than that of controls for males and 4% lower for females. No compound-related clinical signs or gross or microscopic pathologic effects were seen. The liver weight to body weight ratio for male rats exposed to 19000 ppm was significantly greater than that for controls.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Reference
- Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
- gaseous
Chloroethane is a gas with an etheral odour.
Data source
Materials and methods
Results and discussion
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.