Registration Dossier

Physical & Chemical properties

Boiling point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Details of the method are not available for review. The data was taken from a peer reviewed handbook with is considered reliable for assessment
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
other: Experimental
Boiling pt.:
305 °C
Atm. press.:
1 013 hPa

no value given for pressure but assumed to be measured at normal pressure (1013 hPa)

Conclusions:
A boiling point value of 305°C is reported in a handbook which has been subject to peer-review and in which the original data sources are traceable. The result is considered to be reliable.
Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
Attachments are provided in this endpoint study record.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The result was obtained using an appropriate QSAR method (See attached QMRF and QPRF for details)
Boiling pt.:
315 °C
Atm. press.:
1 013 hPa
Conclusions:
A boiling point value of 315°C was obtained using an accepted calculation method. The results are considered reliable

Description of key information

305°C at 1013 hPa (measured, handbook data)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

A measured boiling point value of 305°C at 1013 hPa was obtained from a secondary source (handbook data). This is supported by a predicted boiling point of 315°C obtained using an appropriate calculation method. The supporting result is in good agreement with the key study.