Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1997
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other company data
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
4-Nitrotoluene - CAS N°: 99-99-0 - SIDS Initial Assessment Report.
Author:
OECD
Year:
2003
Bibliographic source:
UNEP Publications

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No data about GLP compliance; analytical purity not reported
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Guideline OECD 406 study available, reporting no concern for sensitisation. Conduct of additional LLNA would not be scientifically justified for animal welfare reasons.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-nitrotoluene
EC Number:
202-808-0
EC Name:
4-nitrotoluene
Cas Number:
99-99-0
Molecular formula:
C7H7NO2
IUPAC Name:
1-methyl-4-nitrobenzene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-nitrotoluene
- Analytical purity: not reported

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: not reported. Young adult animals were used
- Weight at study initiation: 326-521 grams
- Housing: animals were individually housed in wire mesh suspension cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): diet ad libitum during acclimatization and test period
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum during acclimatization and test period
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18°-26°
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs light/12 hrs dark cycle

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
other: epicutaneous, chamber
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
50% w/v
Day(s)/duration:
1/week for a total of 3 approximate 6-hour exposures (see 'details on study design' for further information)
Adequacy of induction:
not specified
Challenge
Route:
other: epicutaneous, chamber
Vehicle:
other: acetone
Concentration / amount:
10% w/v
Day(s)/duration:
see 'details on study design' for further information
No. of animals per dose:
20
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: Irritation screening (Pilot)
The irritation potential of the test material at levels of 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.25% was evaluated in 2 groups of 4 animals each. 4 levels of the test material were evaluated per animal such that each animal in a given pilot group was exposed to the same levels. Dilutions of the test material were formulated w/v in acetone.
On the day prior to test material exposure the hair was removed from each of the animals' backs. A 0.3 ml quantity of each test preparation was applied into a 25 mm chamber which was applied to the clipped surface of the animals in restrainers and occluded with rubber dental dam pulled out and fastened to the bottom of the restrainer with clips. The day following the irritation exposure all animals were depilated and scored.


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Induction Phase

The left shoulder (site 1) of each test animal was clipped the day before exposure. The animals were restrained and a 0.3 ml quantity of the test preparation was applied as previously described. The procedure was repeated at the same site once a week for the next 2 weeks for a total of 3 approximate 6-hour exposures. After the last induction exposure, the animals were left untreated for approximately 2 weeks (13 days) before primary challenge.
50% w/v concentration of 4-nitrotoluene in acetone was chosen for use at induction.


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
Primary Challenge Phase

The test animals were again exposed in the challenge phase.
In addition 10 naive animals which had never been exposed to the test material were concurrently treated with the same test material concentration.
The same exposure procedure was used as for the "Induction Phase" but the chambers were applied to a skin side that had not been exposed previously. Each animal received one patch of the test material using site 2.
10% w/v concentration of 4-nitrotoluene in acetone was chosen for use at primary challenge.
Challenge controls:
See 'details on study design'
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
1-Chloro-2,4-Dinitrobenzene, alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Historical positive control data (Primary Challenge)

1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, incidences-mean score:
0.1% in acetone: 10/10 = 1.7 (24 hrs), 10/10 = 1.4 (48 hrs)

alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyd, techn. = 85 %, incidences-mean score:
5 % in acetone: 10/10 = 1.1 (24 hrs), 7/10 = 0.9 (48 hrs)
2.5 % in acetone: 7/10 = 0.9 (24 hrs), 4/10 = 0.8 (48 hrs)

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
Various: See 'positive control results' field
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: See 'positive control results' field for further details
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
Various: See 'positive control results' field
No. with + reactions:
10
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: See 'positive control results' field for further details
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
10/10 females with slight, patchy erythema, 10/10 males with slight, patchy erythema: numerical mean score : 0.5
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
5/10 females with slight, patchy erythema, 5/10 females with no reaction, 6/10 males with slight, patchy erythema, 4/10 males with no reaction: numerical mean score 0.3
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
5/5 females, 5/5 males : with slight, patchy erythema, numerical mean score, 0.5
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
3/5 females with slight patchy erythema, 2/5 females with no reactions, 2/5 males with slight patchy erythema, 3/5 males with no reaction: numerical mean score 0.3

Any other information on results incl. tables

A tabulated summary of results is provided below: 
































































GroupMaterialConcentrationIncidence of ResponsesMean severity scores
24 hours48 hours
0±1230±12324-h48-h
Testpara-Nitrotoluene10%0200009110000.50.3
Naiive Controlpara-Nitrotoluene10%010000550000.50.3

 


Based on these results an assessment by comparison of responses in the test group to that of the corresponding control group was carried out. Since the Buehler test showed the same effects in the test group and the control group, 4-nitrotoluene was evaluated as not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Executive summary:

Chemfirst Inc. (1998)


 


A Buehler test performed with 20 guinea pigs according to OECD TG 406 with deviations (No data about GLP compliance; analytical purity not reported) did not reveal any skin sensitization.


 


Induction was performed by dermal application of a 50 % solution in acetone and a 10 % solution was used for challenge. Concurrent control guinea pigs were treated with acetone alone. Animals treated with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (10/10 positive at 24 and 48 hrs), or alpha hexylcinnamaldehyde (10/10 positive at 24 hrs, 7/10 at 48 hrs) served as positive controls.


 


4-Nitrotoluene was not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs acoording to the conditions of this study.