Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-299-8 | CAS number: 105-45-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test item MAA was tested in acute studies by oral and dermal application on rats. The acute oral study was performed before implementation of the corresponding OECD- and GLP-guidelines in 1975, however it provides sufficient information to assess it as key study having Klimisch 2. There was an additional acute oral toxicity study published in the JETOC Information sheet No. 43 of April 2000 - Special Issue no. 6. A complete English translation of the report is not available, however the LD50 of this GLP-study was reported to be > 2000 mg/kg.
An additional Klimisch 3, non-guideline conform study with inhalative, intraperitoneal and oral application is available, but was not further assessed due to its poor quality and limited information).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- the study was performed before GLP- and OECD-testing guidelines were available and in force; therefore the study was considered to have Klimisch 2, however itprovides enough information to assess the acute toxicity after to rats after oral application
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- GLP-guidelines not yet in force at date of the study
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Fasted albino rats were used in this study.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- The product under test was placed in a glass syringe and introduced through the esophagus into the stomach with a stainless steel catheter.
- Doses:
- 6 dose groups (males & females) with dosages of:
- 0 mg/kg (control)
- 1000 mg/kg
- 2000 mg/kg
- 2500 mg/kg
- 3200 mg/kg
- 4000 mg/kg
- 8000 mg/kg - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Five animals per sex and dose
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- A group of approximately 70 albino male and female rats, fasted for twenty-four hours were employed to establish an LD50 range for each product under test. Young adult rats which had not been used for previous test purposes were assigned to various dose levels at random. Both sexes were equally distributed. Body weight of the rats was 200-300 grams at the beginning of the study. Animals on the same dosage level were then placed in a common cage with free access to food and water. The animals were observed daily for a two week period. No postmortem, or histopathology examinations were performed in this particular study.
- Statistics:
- no data
- Preliminary study:
- No preliminary test performed.
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 580 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- 2 230 - 2 980
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 3 370 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- 2 920 - 3 900
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed at dose concentrations of 1000 and 2000 mg/kg. Animals were found dead at 2500 mg/kg and above in males and at 3200 mg/kg and above in females. Details are given in the table below.
- Clinical signs:
- other: Males & females dosed at 1.0 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg were sluggish and unkempt following intubation. Normalcy prevailed within 48 hours. Lethargy, nasal hemorrhage and dirty unkempt coats were noted in all animals dosed at levels ranging from 2.5 g/kg. to 4.0 g
- Gross pathology:
- No postmortem, or histopathology examinations were performed in this particular study.
- Other findings:
- no data
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute oral toxicity on Albino rats was determined to be 2580 mg/kg for males and 3370 mg/kg for females.
- Executive summary:
The study was carried out equivalent or similar to EU Method B.1 and OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity). 6 groups of 10 rats (5 male, 5 female) were treated by gavage with doses from 1000 up to 8000 mg/kg.Males & females dosed at 1.0 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg were sluggish and unkempt following intubation. Normalcy prevailed within 48 hours. Lethargy, nasal hemorrhage and dirty unkempt coats were noted in all animals dosed at levels ranging from 2.5 g/kg. to 4.0 g/kg. Death animals were observed at dose levels of 2500 mg/kg and above. At 8000 mg/kg, the animals were comatose immediately after forced feeding and succumbed within 15 minutes.The LD50 value obtained for males was 2580 mg/kg bw and for females 3370 mg/kg bw.
Reference
Mortality:
Dose Level (mg/kg) |
No. of deaths (males) |
Number of deaths (females) |
1000 |
0 |
0 |
2000 |
0 |
0 |
2500 |
3 |
0 |
3200 |
4 |
2 |
4000 |
5 (4 at day 1 & 1 at day 3) |
4 |
8000 |
5 |
5 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 580 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Between 30 January 2012 and 13 February 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: study report was conclusive, done to a valid guideline and conducted under GLP conditions.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Five male and five female Wistar (RccHan:WIST) strain rats were supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK. On receipt the animals were randomly allocated to cages. The females were nulliparous and non pregnant. After an acclimatisation period of at least five days the animals were selected at random and given a number unique within the study by indelible ink-marking on the tail and a number written on a cage card. At the start of the study the animals weighed at least 200g, and were eight to twelve weeks of age. The weight variation did not exceed ±20% of the mean weight for each sex.
The animals were housed in suspended solid floor polypropylene cages furnished with woodflakes. The animals were housed individually during the 24 Hour exposure period and in groups of five, by sex, for the remainder of the study. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2014C Teklad Global Rodent diet supplied by Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet, drinking water and bedding were routinely analysed and were considered not to contain any contaminants that could reasonably be expected to affect the purpose or integrity of the study.
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 19 to 25°C and 30 to 70% respectively. Any occasional deviations from these targets were considered not to have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give twelve hours continuous light (06:00 to 18:00) and twelve hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- The calculated volume of test item, as received, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body surface area) using a graduated syringe.
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg /kg body weight
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males & 5 females
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- On the day before treatment the back and flanks of each animal were clipped free of hair.
Using available information on the toxicity of the test item, a single group of animals was treated as follows:
Dose Level Specific Gravity Dose Volume Number of Rats
(mg/kg) (ml/kg) Male Female
2000 1.077 1.86 5 5
The calculated volume of test item, as received, was applied as evenly as possible to an area of shorn skin (approximately 10% of the total body surface area) using a graduated syringe. A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi occluded with a piece of self adhesive bandage. The animals were caged individually for the 24 Hour exposure period. Shortly after dosing the dressings were examined to ensure that they were securely in place.
After the 24 Hour contact period the bandage was carefully removed and the treated skin and surrounding hair wiped with cotton wool moistened with distilled water to remove any residual test item. The animals were returned to group housing for the remainder of the study period.
The animals were observed for deaths or overt signs of toxicity ½, 1, 2 and 4 hours after dosing and subsequently once daily for fourteen days.
After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and scored according to the following scale from Draize J H (1977) "Dermal and Eye Toxicity Tests" In: Principles and Procedures for Evaluating the Toxicity of Household Substances, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC p.31:
EVALUATION OF SKIN REACTIONS
Erythema and Eschar Formation Value
No erythema 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1
Well-defined erythema 2
Moderate to severe erythema 3
Severe erythema (beef redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) 4
Oedema Formation
No oedema 0
Very slight oedema (barely perceptible) 1
Slight oedema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) 2
Moderate oedema (raised approximately 1 millimetre) 3
Severe oedema (raised more than 1 millimetre and extending beyond the area of exposure) 4
Any other skin reactions, if present were also recorded.
Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test item on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.
At the end of the study the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. All animals were subjected to gross necropsy. This consisted of an external examination and opening of the abdominal and thoracic cavities. The appearance of any macroscopic abnormalities was recorded. No tissues were retained. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed.
- Preliminary study:
- no pretest performed
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limits not reported.
- Mortality:
- There were no deaths.
- Clinical signs:
- other: There were no signs of systemic toxicity.
- Gross pathology:
- No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
- Other findings:
- Dermal Reactions: There were no signs of dermal irritation.
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed according to OECD Guidelines No. 402 and EU-Method B3. A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24 hour, semi‑occluded dermal application of the undiluted test item to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight. There were no deaths and no signs of systemic toxicity. All animals showed expected gains in bodyweight over the study period. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy. The acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item in the Wistar strain rat was found to be greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight.
Reference
Evaluation of Data:
Data evaluations included the relationship, if any, between the exposure of the animal to the test item and the incidence and severity of all abnormalities including behavioural and clinical observations, gross lesions, bodyweight changes, mortality and any other toxicological effects.
Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the test item was made.
The results were also interpreted according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 for classification and labelling of dangerous substances and the Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals.
Table 1 Individual Clinical Observations and Mortality Data
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Hours) |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
||||||||||||||||
½ |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1-1 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-2 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-3 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1-4 Male |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-0 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-1 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-2 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-3 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
2-4 Female |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 = No signs of systemic toxicity
Table 2 Individual Dermal Reactions - Males
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Observation |
Effects Noted After Initiation of Exposure (Days) |
|||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
|||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-1 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-2 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-3 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1-4 Male |
Erythema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Oedema |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
Other |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 = No reactions
Table 4 Individual Bodyweights and Weekly Bodyweight Changes
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number and Sex |
Bodyweight (g) at Day |
Bodyweight Change (g) During Week |
|||
0 |
7 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
||
2000 |
1-0 Male |
244 |
275 |
293 |
31 |
18 |
1-1 Male |
234 |
259 |
290 |
25 |
31 |
|
1-2 Male |
239 |
275 |
298 |
36 |
23 |
|
1-3 Male |
234 |
254 |
280 |
20 |
26 |
|
1-4 Male |
226 |
252 |
273 |
26 |
21 |
|
2-0 Female |
201 |
211 |
222 |
10 |
11 |
|
2-1 Female |
211 |
233 |
243 |
22 |
10 |
|
2-2 Female |
205 |
214 |
224 |
9 |
10 |
|
2-3 Female |
224 |
225 |
236 |
1 |
11 |
|
2-4 Female |
205 |
212 |
224 |
7 |
12 |
Table 5 Individual Necropsy Findings
Dose Level mg/kg |
Animal Number |
Time of Death |
Macroscopic Observations |
2000 |
1-0 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
1-1 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-2 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-3 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
1-4 Male |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-0 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-1 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-2 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-3 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
2-4 Female |
Killed Day 14 |
No abnormalities detected |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Key study: Acute toxicity – oral
A study was carried out equivalent or similar to EU Method B.1 and OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity). 6 groups of 10 rats (5 male, 5 female) were treated by gavage with doses from 1000 up to 8000 mg/kg. Males & females dosed at 1.0 g/kg and 2.0 g/kg were sluggish and unkempt following intubation. Normalcy prevailed within 48 hours. Lethargy, nasal hemorrhage and dirty unkempt coats were noted in all animals dosed at levels ranging from 2.5 g/kg. to 4.0 g/kg. Death animals were observed at dose levels of 2500 mg/kg and above. At 8000 mg/kg, the animals were comatose immediately after forced feeding and succumbed within 15 minutes. The LD50 value obtained for males was 2580 mg/kg bw and for females 3370 mg/kg bw.
Key study: Acute toxicity – inhalation
Read-across from the supporting substance Methyl acetate (CAS no.: 79-20-9 / EC no.: 201-185 -2). Methyl acetoacetate is a well defined mono-constitutent substance of high purity. Based on the similar structure and properties, the substance Methyl acetate was selected as representative model structure for read-across. Compared to MAA, the selected structure show similar physical-chemical, toxicological and ecotoxicological properties. A data matrix covering all available endpoints was previously published in the EU-Risk assessment Report Vol. 34 of 2003. The available data on MAA and selected model constituent revealed similar properties. For Methyl acetate, Smyth et al (1962) reported a LC0 of 49.2 mg/l/4h and a LC50 of > 49.2 mg/l/4h on rabbits.
Key study: Acute toxicity – dermal
The study was performed according to OECD Guidelines No. 402 and EU-Method B3. A group of ten animals (five males and five females) was given a single, 24 hour, semi‑occluded dermal application of the undiluted test item to intact skin at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bodyweight.. There were neither deaths nor clinical signs observed. There were no signs of dermal irritation, body weights remained unchanged and necropsy revealed no abnormalities. The LD50 was found to be > 2000 mg/kg body weight.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
non-GLP study following OECD-guideline; Klimisch 2
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
GLP-study following OECD-guideline; Klimisch 1
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available the substance is not classified or labeled according to Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) or Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.