Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-977-0 | CAS number: 101-80-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1992
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- Non-GLP literature study in 49 different chemicals. Methodology is detailed, as are results per substance, and well documented.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- See "principles of method" below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The substance was tested in a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test that employed three daily exposures by intraperitoneal injection.
Bone marrow samples were obtained 24 hr following the final exposure.
Dose Determination Studies
Groups of 5 mice (aged 9-14 weeks, weighing 25-33 g) were administered 4,4’-oxydianiline (mixed in corn oil and suspended with a Tek-Mar Tissumizer) via i.p. injection at a volume of 0.4 mL per mouse on 3 consecutive days. Animals were monitored twice daily, and 48 hours after the third treatment, the surviving mice were euthanized. Bone marrow smears were prepared by a direct technique, fixed, and stained with acridine orange. Bone marrow smears from each animal were evaluated at 1000x magnification using epi-illuminated fluorescence microscopy for determination of the percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) among 200 erythrocytes. Based on the results obtained, the maximum administered dose was estimated or additional dose determination experiments were conducted to more accurately estimate the maximum dose to be tested in the primary micronucleus (MN) test. The selection of the maximum dose to be tested for MN induction was based on mortality.
Main study
Groups of 5 mice were injected i.p. on 3 consecutive days with either the test substance (at 32.5, 75, or 150 mg/kg), the positive control chemical (12.5 mg/kg 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene in corn oil), or the solvent (corn oil). Mice were euthanized 24 hours after the third treatment. Bone marrow smears were prepared, fixed, and stained with acridine orange. For each animal, slides were evaluated at 1000x magnification for the number of MNPCE among 2000 PCE and for the percentage of PCE among 200 erythrocytes.
A repeat test was performed since the results from the initial test suggested a possible positive effect. - GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,4'-oxydianiline
- EC Number:
- 202-977-0
- EC Name:
- 4,4'-oxydianiline
- Cas Number:
- 101-80-4
- Molecular formula:
- C12H12N2O
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,4'-oxydianiline
- Test material form:
- not specified
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: p,p'-oxydianiline or 4,4'-diaminodiphenyl ether or 4,4'-oxidianilline
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): Not specified.
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): Not specified.
- InChl (if other than submission substance): Not specified.
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): Included within the literature report; confirms the identity.
- Substance type: Not specified.
- Physical state: Not specified.
- Analytical purity: Not specified.
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Not specified.
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: Not specified.
- Isomers composition: Not specified.
- Purity test date: Not specified.
- Lot/batch No.: Not specified.
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Not specified.
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling): Not applicable
- Specific activity (if radiolabelling): Not applicable
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling): Not applicable
- Expiration date of radiochemical substance (if radiolabelling): Not applicable
- Stability under test conditions: Not applicable
- Storage condition of test material: Not applicable
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- 4,4'-oxydianiline
4,4'-diaminodiphenyl ether
CAS 101-80-4
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- B6C3F1
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: National Toxicology Program production facility at Taconic Farms
- Age at study initiation: 9 to 14 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: within a 2 g range of a mean weight between 25 and 33 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: Not specified
- Fasting period before study: Not specified
- Housing: Not specified
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Not specified
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Not specified.
- Acclimation period: Not specified
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Not specified
- Humidity (%): Not specified
- Air changes (per hr): Not specified
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Not specified
IN-LIFE DATES: Not specified.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: mixed in corn oil and suspended with a Tek-Mar Tissumizer
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Not specified
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: Variable, dependant on dose level (see below on details of exposure)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): Not applicable
- Type and concentration of dispersant aid (if powder): Not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): Not specified
- Purity: Not specified. - Details on exposure:
- Within each experiment, male B6C3F1 mice (obtained from the National Toxicology Program production facility at Taconic Farms) of a common age between 9 and 14 weeks and weighing within a 2 g range of a mean weight between 25 and 33 g were used. The substance was prepared in the appropriate solvent (corn oil for water-insoluble chemicals) and suspended using either a Tek-Mar Tissumizer for chemicals in corn oil All test chemicals were administered within 30 min of preparation. Suspended DMBA was stored at room temperature and dissolved MMC was stored at 0-5deg C between treatments within an experiment.
All treatments were by intraperitoneal (IP, injection at a volume of 0.4 ml per mouse. Identification numbers were randomly assigned to mice prior to euthanasia.
Dose Determination Studies
See below in the section "Any other information on materials and methods".
First main study
In the first main study, groups of 5-7 mice were injected IP on three consecutive days with either the test chemical (150, 75 and 37.5 mg/kg bw), a weakly active dose of the positive control chemical (Dimethylbenzanthracene or DMBA at 12.5 mgikg bw in corn oil) or the solvent (corn oil). Mice were euthanized with CO, 24 hr after the third treatment. Bone marrow smears (two slides mouse) were prepared, fixed in absolute methanol, and stained with acridine orange. For each animal. slides were evaluated at 1,000 X magnification for the number of MN-PCE among 2,000 PCE and for the percentage of PCE among 200 erythrocytes.
Repeated main study
A repeat test was conducted based on results of the first study, and according the same method, at the dose levels of 75 and 150 mg/kg bw. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Post exposure period:
- 24 hours after the 3rd treatment.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- First main test
- Dose / conc.:
- 37.5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- First main test
- Dose / conc.:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- First main test
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- First main test
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Repeat test
- Dose / conc.:
- 75 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Repeat test
- Dose / conc.:
- 150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Repeat test
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 Males per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Positive controls used were Dimethylbenzanthracene and Mitomycin C
Route of administration: Interperitoneal
Dose: Dimethylbenzanthracene (12.5 mg / kg).
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow (two slides/tissue/mouse)
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: toxicitylmortality observed in the dose determination studies (see below the section "Any other information on materials and methods")
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): As detailed above.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Air dried. Fixed using absolute methanol and stained with acridine orange
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: 1000x magnification using epi-illuminated fluorescence microscopy for determination of the percentage of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) among 200 erythrocytes. - Statistics:
- The data were analyzed using the Micronucleus Assay Data Management and Statistical software package (version 1.4), which was designed specifically for in vivo micronucleus data [ILS, 1990]. The level of significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05. To determine whether a specific treatment resulted in a significant increase in MN-PCE, the number of MN-PCE were pooled within each dose group and analyzed by a one-tailed trend test. In the software package used, the trend test incorporates a variance inflation factor to account for excess animal variability. In the event that the increase in the dose response curve is nonmonotonic, the software program allows for the data to be analyzed for a significant positive trend after data at the highest dose only has been excluded. However, in this event, the alpha level is adjusted to 0.01 to protect against false positives.
The %PCE data were analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test based on pooled data. Pairwise comparisons between each group and the concurent solvent control group was by an unadjusted one-tailed Pearson chisquared test which incorporated the calculated variance inflation factor for the study.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The initial test was negative by trend analysis but the MN-PCE frequencies in the low (37.5 mglkg) and middle (75 mg/kg) dose groups were markedly elevated.
A repeat test was therefore performed since the results from the initial test suggested a possible positive effect. The repeat test was positive by trend analysis with the high dose group elevated significantly above the control. Overall, these results were considered positive. Following decoding of the chemicals, a trend analysis was run on the initial test data after omitting the high dose group. This trend analysis gave a P = 0.001 adding support to the conclusion that this compound induces MN.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Results:
Test |
Trend Pvalue |
Dose (mg/kg) |
MN-PCE/ l,000 (No. animals) |
Pair-wise |
Survival |
% PCE |
|
Initial test |
0.095 |
0 |
1.70 ± 0.26 (5) |
|
5/5 |
58.2 |
|
(0.001) |
37.5 |
3.30 ± 0.46 (5) |
0.0117 |
5/5 |
46.3 |
||
|
|
75 |
4.20 ± 0.89 (5) |
<0.001 |
5/5 |
56.0 |
|
|
|
150 |
2.90 ± 0.40 (5) |
0.0383 |
5/5 |
50.1 |
|
Repeat test |
0.013 |
0 |
1.20 ± 0.41 (5) |
|
5/5 |
50.8 |
|
|
75 |
1.70 ± 0.34 (5) |
0.1764 |
5/5 |
62.8 |
||
|
|
150 |
2.63 ± 0.24 (4) |
0.0132 |
4/5 |
61.4 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Conclusion: positive
The initial test was negative by trend analysis but the MN-PCE frequencies in the low (37.5 mg / kg) and middle (75 mg/kg) dose groups were markedly elevated. The repeat test was positive by trend analysis with the high dose group elevated significantly above the control. Overall, these results were considered positive. Following decoding of the chemicals, a trend analysis was run on the initial test data after omitting the high dose group. This trend analysis gave a P = 0.001 adding support to the conclusion that this compound induces MN. - Executive summary:
The substance was tested in a mouse bone marrow micronucleus test that employed three daily exposures by intraperitoneal injection.
Bone marrow samples were obtained 24 hr following the final exposure.
A statistically significant increase in the MN-PCE frequencies was observed.
According to these results, the substance is considered to induce micronuclei in the mouse bone marrow.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.