Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-641-1 | CAS number: 70516-41-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Cortical tubular basophilia was evident in the kidneys of females given S-205 at 1000 mg/kg/day. Under the conditions of this study, this was not considered to be adverse as the changes were predominantly minimal, occurred unilaterally in the majority of animals and were without a correlate.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 31 July to 05 November 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study undertaken at GLP accredited laboratory to internationally accepted guidelines.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The deviations were considered to have not affected the integrity or validity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OPPTS 870.3050, Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, July 2000.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The deviations were considered to have not affected the integrity or validity of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl: CD® (SD)]
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Commercial laboratory animal supplier.
- Age at study initiation: 42 to 48 days
- Weight at study initiation: 222 to 268 g for males and 177 to 217 g for females.
- Fasting period before study: Fasting overnight before routine blood sampling
- Housing: The animals were housed five of one sex per cage made of a polycarbonate body with a stainless steel mesh lid.
- Diet: The animals were allowed free access to a standard rodent diet (Rat and Mouse No. 1 Maintenance Diet)
- Water: Potable water taken from the public supply was freely available via polycarbonate bottles fitted with sipper tubes.
- Acclimation period: 13 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 to 23°C
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70%
- Air changes: Each animal room was kept at positive pressure with respect to the outside by its own supply of filtered fresh air, which was passed to atmosphere and not re-circulated.
- Photoperiod: Artificial lighting was controlled to give a cycle of 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours continuous dark per 24 hours. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: aqueous 1% methylcellulose
- Details on oral exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): All formulations were prepared freshly each week and prepared in advance of the first day of dosing. Formulations were stored in a fridge (nominally 4°C) pending use or for up to 24 hours at room temperature (nominally 21°C).
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: The vehicle used was aqueous 1% methylcellulose and is an accepted medium.
- Concentration in vehicle: 3, 30 and 100 mg/ml
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg
: - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The homogeneity and stability was confirmed for S-205 in aqueous 1% methylcellulose formulations at nominal concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL during distribution between the bottles, during magnetic stirring for 2 hours, ambient temperature storage for 1 day and refrigerated storage for up to 15 days. The storage times represented the expected maximum time from preparation to completion of administration.
The mean concentrations of S-205 in test formulations analysed for Groups 3 and 4 in the study were within +10%/-15% of nominal concentrations, confirming accurate formulation. The mean concentrations of S-205 in test formulations analysed for Group 2 were outside the applied limits; this was considered to be due to a problem with homogeneity rather than an incorrectly prepared formulation. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
30 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
300 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Doses of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were selected for a preliminary toxicity study in the rat by oral gavage administration for seven days (Huntingdon Life Sciences Study Number JAR0004) based on an acute oral toxicity study in the rat (HLS Study Number 82203D/YMD26/AC) in which no death was apparent following a single dose of 16 g/kg and signs of reaction to treatment were restricted to piloerection, hunched posture and abnormal gait and lower than anticipated bodyweight gain during the first week after administration. On study JAR0004 doses of 250, 500 and 1000 mg/kg/day were well tolerated with no death or treatment-related clinical sign. Possible treatment-related findings were slightly increased water consumption (by visual assessment) in animals treated at 500 mg/kg/day or above and slightly higher than expected liver weights in males treated at 1000 mg/kg/day. Accordingly, doses of 0, 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day were selected for this
study. - Positive control:
- None
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Day 29
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes; Animals were held under light general anaesthesia induced by isoflurane and blood samples were withdrawn from the sublingual vein.
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: All
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No
URINALYSIS: No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no unscheduled death during the treatment period. There was no post dosing sign and no toxicologically significant clinical sign observed during the treatment period.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There was no unscheduled death during the treatment period. There was no post dosing sign and no toxicologically significant clinical sign observed during the treatment period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Bodyweight gains over the treatment period were considered to be unaffected by treatment.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The haematological investigation on Day 29 revealed elongated prothrombin times for females receiving 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day (1.08 and 1.11x Control, respectively). Males were considered to be unaffected with regards to all parameters.
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Motor activity scores for males and females showed some inter-group variation but there was no difference considered to be associated with S-205.
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Analysis of the organ weight data from animals killed after 4 weeks of treatment did not reveal any toxicologically significant changes.
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The macroscopic examination performed after 4 weeks of treatment revealed no intergroup difference.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Changes related to treatment with S-205 were seen in the kidneys
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- CLINICAL SIGNS AND MORTALITY
There was no unscheduled death during the treatment period. There was no post dosing sign and no toxicologically significant clinical sign observed during the treatment period.
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN
Bodyweight gains over the treatment period were considered to be unaffected by treatment.
HAEMATOLOGY
The haematological investigation on Day 29 revealed elongated prothrombin times for females receiving 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day (1.08 and 1.11x Control, respectively). Monocyte counts were considered to be low for females receiving 1000 mg/kg/day (0.57x Control) and total white cell counts were slightly low (0.76x Control). Individual monocyte and total white blood cell numbers for animals treated at 1000 mg/kg/day were
within the Control individual ranges. Accordingly, the variations from Control of the mean values were considered to be normal biological variation. Males were considered to be unaffected with regards to all parameters.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
Biochemical analysis of the blood plasma on Day 29 revealed slightly low aspartate amino transferase activity for males receiving 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day (0.81 and 0.91x Control respectively), although this showed no dose related trend and is, therefore, considered to be fortuitous and due to high inter animal variability.
NEUROBEHAVIOUR
Motor activity scores for males and females showed some inter-group variation but there was no difference considered to be associated with S-205.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
Analysis of the organ weight data from animals killed after 4 weeks of treatment did not reveal any toxicologically significant changes.
Thymus weights were considered to be slightly low for males receiving 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day (0.89x Control), however, statistical significance was not attained and, in the absence of a microscopic correlate, this variance from Control was considered to be normal biological variation.
GROSS PATHOLOGY
The macroscopic examination performed after 4 weeks of treatment revealed no intergroup difference.
The nature and incidence of all findings were consistent with the commonly seen background of macroscopic changes in Sprague Dawley rats at these laboratories.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: NON-NEOPLASTIC
Changes related to treatment with S-205 were seen in the kidneys.
An increased incidence and severity of cortical tubular basophilia was seen in the kidneys of female animals given 1000 mg/kg/day. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Oral administration of S-205 (an industrial chemical with colourant properties) to Crl: CD® (SD) rats at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day daily for a period of four weeks was well tolerated without any evidence of overt toxicity; following histopathological examination, the kidney was identified as a target organ.
Cortical tubular basophilia was evident in the kidneys of females given S-205 at 1000 mg/kg/day. Under the conditions of this study, this was not considered to be adverse as the changes were predominantly minimal, occurred unilaterally in the majority of animals and were without a correlate.
It was concluded that, under the conditions of this study, the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) was 1000 mg/kg/day.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Klimisch 1
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Only study available
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects (target organ) urogenital: kidneys
Justification for classification or non-classification
Although cortical tubular basophilia was evident in the kidneys of females at 1000 mg/kg/day this was not considered to be adverse as the changes were predominantly minimal, occurred unilaterally in the majority of animals and were without a correlate. Therefore S-205 will not be classified as toxic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.