Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-846-0 | CAS number: 111-21-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 July - 3 Oct 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted in 1997)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- No. 440/2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese METI/MHLW/MAFF
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom, London, UK
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2,2'-[ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxy)]bisethyl diacetate
- EC Number:
- 203-846-0
- EC Name:
- 2,2'-[ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxy)]bisethyl diacetate
- Cas Number:
- 111-21-7
- Molecular formula:
- C10H18O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[2-(2-acetyloxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl acetate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Triethylene Glycol Diacetate [2,2'-(ethane-1,2-diylbis(oxy))bisethyl Diacetate]
- Physical state/Appearance: clear, colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.2%
- Lot/batch No.:
- Expiry date: 24 Feb 2015
- Storage conditions: room temperature, in the dark
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Details on strain: albino Hsd:ICR (CD-1)
- Source: Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 6-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 23-30 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: no data
- Housing: groups of up to 7 in solid-floor polypropylene cages with wood-flake bedding
- Diet: Harlan Teklad 2014C Global Certified Rodent Diet (Harlan Laboratories UK Ltd., Oxon, UK), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS
Dosing solutions were prepared freshly by dissolving appropriate amounts of the test material in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) yielding a final concentration of 40, 80, 100, 150, 160, or 200 mg/mL in the pre-test and in the main test.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amounts applied: 1600, 800, and 400 mg/kg bw/day (Pretest: 1000, 1500, 1600, and 2000 mg/kg bw)
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes, 10 mL/kg bw - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not applicable
- Frequency of treatment:
- single treatment
- Post exposure period:
- - Test groups: 24 or 48 h
- Control groups: 24 h
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1600, 800, and 400 mg/kg bw
Basis:
other: intraperitoneal dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7 males per time point
(Pre-test: 2-4 animals per dose) - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): Cyclophosphamide is known to produce micronuclei under the conditions of the test.
- Route of administration: orally
- Doses / concentrations: 50 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tissue: bone marrow
Cell type: bone marrow cells - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
A range-finding test was performed to find suitable dose levels of the test item, route of administration, and to investigate if there was a marked difference in toxic response between the sexes. 1600 mg/kg bw (i.p.) was selected as maximum tolerable dose (MTD) and thus, as the highest dose in the main test. There was no marked difference in toxicity of the test item between the sexes; therefore the main test was performed using only male mice.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
7 males per group were dosed once via the intraperitoneal route with the test item at 1600, 800, or 400 mg/kg bw. One group of mice from each dose level was killed by cervical dislocation 24 h following treatment and a second group (1600 mg/kg bw) was killed after 48 h. Two additional groups of male mice were treated with PBS (vehicle) alone (7 mice, intraperitoneal) and cyclophosphamide (5 mice, orally), respectively.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Immediately following termination (24 or 48 h following dosing), both femurs were dissected from each animal, aspirated with foetal bovine serum and bone marrow smears were prepared following centrifugation and re-suspension. The smears were air-dried, fixed in absolute methanol, stained in May-Grünwald/Giemsa, allowed to air-dry and a cover slip applied using mounting medium.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
Stained bone marrow smears were examined blind using light microscopy at x 1000 magnification. Where possible, the incidence of micronucleated cells per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal was scored. In addition, the number of normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) associated with 1000 erythrocytes was counted; these cells were also scored for incidence of micronuclei. The ratio of PCE to NCE was calculated together with appropriate group mean values and standard deviations. - Evaluation criteria:
- The number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes occurring in each of the test item groups were compared to the number occurring in the vehicle control group. A positive mutagenic response would be demonstrated when a statistically significant dose-dependent, toxicologically relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes was observed for either the 24 or 48 hour killing time compared to the vehicle control.
If the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes is found to be significantly lower than the control value, this is taken as being indicative of cytotoxicity. - Statistics:
- Student's t-test (two-tailed), one way analysis of variance
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- clinical signs were seen in the 1600 mg/kg bw groups
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 1000 to 2000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: 2000 mg/kg bw, oral: hunched posture, ptosis, and some weight loss; 2000 mg/kg bw, i.p.: a premature death in one animal and hunched posture and ptosis in the other; 1500 and 1600 mg/kg bw, i.p.: hunched posture and ptosis; 1000 mg/kg bw: no clinical signs
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei: There was no evidence of any statistically significant increases in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in animals dosed with the test item when compared to the vehicle control.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: No statistically significant decreases in the PCE/NCE ratio were noted in any of the test item dose groups when compared to the vehicle control group. The observation of clinical signs indicate that systemic absorption had occurred and exposure to the target tissue had been achieved.
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: dose levels and route were based on the result of a range-finding study
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: at 1600 mg/kg bw, in both the 24 and 48 h dose groups, hunched posture and ptosis
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Micronucleus test – Summary of group mean data
Treatment group |
Sampling time |
No. PCE with micronuclei per 2000 PCE |
PCE/NCE ratio |
||
(hours after treatment) |
Group mean |
SD |
Group mean |
SD |
|
Vehicle Control (PBS) 10 mL/kg bw |
24 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.74 |
0.11 |
Positive control (Cyclophosphamide) 50 mg/kg bw |
24 |
21.2*** |
9.7 |
0.97 |
0.23 |
Test item 1600 mg/kg bw |
48 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.77 |
0.14 |
Test item 1600 mg/kg bw |
24 |
1.4 |
1.3 |
0.70 |
0.13 |
Test item 800 mg/kg bw |
24 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
0.88 |
0.35 |
Test item 400 mg/kg bw |
24 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
1.06 |
0.43 |
*** = P < 0.001
SD = standard deviation
PCE = polychromatic erythrocytes
NCE = normochromatic erythrocytes
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.