Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 931-974-3 | CAS number: 1231880-35-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Additional information
Two comprehensive stream mesocosm studies are available for two read-across substances belonging to the category of alkyl sulfates: C12AS Na (CAS 151-21-3) and C14-15AS Na (CAS 68081-98-1).
An ecosystem - level NOEC for C12AS was determined in a flowing stream mesocosm that was continuously fed water from a high -quality natural stream in southwestern Ohio (the Lower East Fork of the Little Miami River). Stream channels were naturally colonized by algae and invertebrates for 22 -71 days, depending upon substrate, prior to dosing. Six stream channels were dosed with the test substance at nominal concentrations of (control) 0, 26, 78, 233, 700 and 2100 μg active ingredient/L for an additional 56 days. Mean measured concentrations, based on sampling at least once per week, were: Control 0, 20, 61, 224, 582, and 1586 μg active ingredient/L. The mean measured active C12AS concentrations were 76 -96% of nominal. Periphyton and invertebrate communities were extensively sampled prior to dosing and 7, 14, 28, 42, and 56 days after dosing. The 56 -d exposure to C12AS was accompanied by detailed investigations of periphyton community function (autotrophy, heterotrophy, and metabolism of test chemical), periphyton structure (algal population and community dynamics based on taxonomic identity), protozoan structure, and invertebrate structure (benthic abundance, drift, and insect emergence patterns based on taxonomic identity). Single species, caged fish were evaluated in companion studies in the ESF but are not represented in this study summary. The ecosystem-level NOEC is an integrated assessment of all available information. Results of all structural and functional endpoints for both periphyton and invertebrate communities were included when calculating the 56 -day, ecosystem -level toxicological NOEC, which was 224 μg/L (mean measured C12AS). This toxicological ecosystem NOEC was based on reductions in numerical abundance of the mayfly species Stenonema and the stoneflies Plecoptera at >582 μg/L. However, these responses may have been another artifact of bacterial proliferation on the substrate. The decreases observed for Plecoptera and Stenonema were possibly related to their inability to find exposed substrate with swift flow. As such, this NOEC may be viewed as conservative. Further, this value is protective of significant decreases observed for Corbicula abundance at 1585 μg/L. Bacteria proliferated from the C12AS energy subsidy. A nutritional subsidy response of 61 μg/L associated with community changes from C12AS mineralization was determined, which represents nutritional effects related to alteration in food and exposed substrate availability. The toxicological NOEC is considered the final ecosystem NOEC because it relates to the direct toxicity to organisms. A low or no assessment factor, which incorporates uncertainty and the degree of extrapolation of laboratory results to the field, can be applied to the model toxicological ecosystem -level NOEC of 224 μg/L, in evaluating C12AS risk to sensitive aquatic organisms.
Moreover, a comprehensive stream mesocosm study is available with a surfactant that was composed of tetra- (C14) and pentadecyl (C15) chain lengths (C14 -15AS). An ecosystem-level NOEC for C14 -15AS was determined in a flowing stream mesocosm that was continuously fed water from a high -quality natural stream in southwestern Ohio, USA (the Lower East Fork of the Little Miami River). Stream channels were naturally colonized by algae and invertebrates for 55 days (May-July 1997) prior to dosing. Four stream channels were dosed at mean measured concentrations of Control, 57, 106, 222, and 419 μg/L (mean measured active C14 -15AS concentrations were 84 -91% of nominal) for an additional 56 days (July-September 1997). Periphyton and invertebrate communities were extensively sampled prior to dosing, and 14, 28, 42, and 56 days after dosing. Results are based on measured concentrations. The 56-d exposure to C14-15AS was accompanied by detailed investigations of periphyton community function (autotrophy, heterotrophy, and metabolism of test chemical), periphyton structure (algal population and community dynamics based on taxonomic identity), and invertebrate structure (benthic abundance, drift, and insect emergence patterns based on taxonomic identity). Single species, caged fish were evaluated in companion studies in the ESF but are not represented in this study summary. Results of all structural and functional endpoints for both periphyton and invertebrate communities were included in calculating the 56-day, ecosystem-level NOEC of 106 μg/L (mean measured C14-15AS). The ecosystem-level NOEC is an integrated assessment of all available information. A higher no-observed-effect-concentration (NOEC) of 222 μg/L was determined for several individual algal and invertebrate species based on univariate statistical analyses. A multivariate analysis based on principal response curves (PRC) indicated that communities in streams exposed to 222 to 419 μg/L were significantly different from the controls, leading to an overall (multivariate and univariate) conclusion that 106 μg/L was the ecosystem NOEC. An apparent energetic subsidy from C14–15AS at the highest concentrations of 222 to 419 μg/L was observed and linked to changes in microbial community processing of AS at these concentrations. A low or no assessment factor, which incorporates uncertainty and the degree of extrapolation of laboratory results to the field, can be applied to the model ecosystem-level NOEC of 106 μg/L in evaluating C14-15AS risk to sensitive aquatic organisms. No assessment factor is needed because the duration of the exposure was long relative to chronic studies, the system contained sensitive flora and fauna, replication was high resulting in statistical sensitivity for key endpoints, ESF communities were highly representative of natural communities, a deep understanding of chemical exposure was developed, and results were consistent with expectations from chronic toxicity studies and species sensitivity distribution analysis.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.