Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1970
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Final report on the safety assessment of Trilaurin, Triarachidin, Tribehenin, Tricaprin, Tricaprylin, Trierucin, Triheptanoin, Triheptylundecanoin, Triisononanoin, Triisopalmitin, Triisostearin, Trilinolein, Trimyristin, Trioctanoin, Triolein, Tripalmitin
Author:
Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR)
Year:
2001
Bibliographic source:
Int J Toxicol. 2001;20 Suppl 4:61-94

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Teratogenicity study in mice
GLP compliance:
no
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Glycerol trioctanoate
EC Number:
208-686-5
EC Name:
Glycerol trioctanoate
Cas Number:
538-23-8
Molecular formula:
C27H50O6
IUPAC Name:
propane-1,2,3-triyl trioctanoate

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other: ICR-JCL
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 4-8 weeks
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22-25
- Humidity (%): 55 - 60

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
other: 1.2% Tween 80/0.8% Span 80 in water
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test substance was mixed with 1.2% (w/v)Tween 80 and 0.8% (w/v) Span 80 in water. The emulsion was prepared with Manton Gaulin Homgenizer.

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: low water solubility
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Details on mating procedure:
No detailed information is available.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Day 7-12 of gestation
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Duration of test:
Day 18 of gestation
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
2 other: mL/kg (actual ingested)
Dose / conc.:
10 other: mL/kg (actual ingested)
Dose / conc.:
1 908 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
calculated based on a density value of 0.954 g/mL
Dose / conc.:
9 540 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
calculated based on a density value of 0.954 g/mL
No. of animals per sex per dose:
20 P females
Control animals:
other: physiological saline or soybean oil

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: on Days 0, 7 and 18 of gestation

Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No
- Number of corpora lutea: No
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: No
Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Soft tissue examinations: No
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: [all per litter]
- Head examinations: No

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

Maternal developmental toxicity

Details on maternal toxic effects:
Maternal toxic effects:no effects

Details on maternal toxic effects:
No differences were observed between test substance administration group, control group and soybean oil administration group.

Effect levels (maternal animals)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
maternal toxicity
Effect level:
9 540 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity

Results (fetuses)

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
External abnormalities: cleft palate was observed in 1 foetus of control, 1 foetus of the 2 mL/kg bw/day dose group and 3 foetuses of the 10 mL/kg bw/day dose group. No cleft palate was found in foetuses receiving soybean oil. Club foot was observed in 1 foetus of control, 4 foetuses of the soybean oil control group, 3 foetuses of the 2 mL/kg bw/day dose group and 4 foetuses of the 10 mL/kg bw/day dose group.
Skeletal abnormalities: Two foetuses showed assimilation of the ribs in the 2 mL/kg bw/day dose group. One foetus showed assimilation of the cervical vertebra in the 10 mL/kg bw/day dose group. However, these effects did not follow a clear dose-dependency.

Effect levels (fetuses)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Remarks:
teratogenicity
Effect level:
9 540 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect level:
other: teratogenicity

Fetal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
not specified

Overall developmental toxicity

Developmental effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Effects on foetuses of parental females treated with the test substance (2 and 10 mL/kg) and soybean oil

Groups

No of mothers

No. of fetuses

Live fetuses

Dead

No.

Mean body weight (g)

No. of resorbed fetuses

No. of dead fetuses

Total (%)

M.

F.

M.+F.

Control

20

232 (11.6 ± 0.39)

116

104

220

1.28 ± 0.023

11

1

12 (5.2)

Soybean oil

20

223 (11.1 ± 0.46)

101

114

215

1.26 ± 0.021

6

2

8 (3.6)

2 mL/kg

20

231 (11.5 ± 0.29)

113

107

220

1.29 ± 0.023

9

2

11 (4.8)

10 mL/kg

20

232 (11.6 ± 0.40)

107

112

219

1.26 ± 0.030

12

1

13 (5.6)

M.: male, F.: female

Mean ± standard error

Table 2. Malformations in foetuses of parental females treated with the test substance (2 and 10 mL/kg) and soybean oil

Group

Malformed

No. (%)

Type

Ex

Sk

Control

3 (1.4)

0

1: Curled tail

1: Cleft palate

1: Club foot

Soybean oil

4 (1.9)

0

4: Club foot

2 mL/kg

4 (1.8)

2 (0.9)

1: Cleft palate

3: Club foot

2: Assimilation of the ribs

10 mL/kg

7 (3.2)

1 (0.5)

3: Cleft palate

4: Club foot

1: Assimilation of the cervical vertebra

Ex: external malformation

Sk: skeletal malformation

Applicant's summary and conclusion