Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2002
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
According to OECD 473 the highest concentration should show a mitotic index greater than 50%. With mitotic indices of 46 and 48%, this criterion was barely missed.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate
EC Number:
204-876-7
EC Name:
Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate
Cas Number:
128-04-1
Molecular formula:
C3H7NS2.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
lymphocytes: human
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix from livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with phenobarbitone (80 mg/kg bw) and -naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw). (3 daily oral doses). Livers were prepared 24 h after the doses.
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
±S9: 0 – 268.5 µg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: –S9: Mitomycin C (MMC, 0.2-0.4 µg/mL, dissolved in MEM) +S9: Cyclophosphamide (CP, 10 µg/mL, dissolved in DMSO)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
DURATION:
- Exposure duration: 4, 24 h
- Harvest time: 24 h from beginning of treatment

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
100 per culture, 2 cultures per concentration

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
lymphocytes: human
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
GENOTOXICITY:
The test material did not induce any significant dose-related increases in the frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations or in the number of polyploid cells in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.

CYTOTOXICITY:
Clear toxic effects were observed after 4 h treatment with 89.5 µg/mL in the absence and presence of S9 mix. At the 24-hours exposure without S9 the toxic level was already reached at 22.38 µg/mL.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 7.6.1-B1 Results of Chromosome Aberration Test – Experiment 1 without metabolic activation
(4 h exposure to SDDC, harvest 24 h after start of exposure)

total incidences in 100 cells scored

MMC
0.4 µg/mL

Solvent control

SDDC [µg/mL]

89.5

134.28

268.5

Replicate

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

Cytotoxicity  

(Mitotic inhibition > 50 %)

Yes

No

No

No

No

Gaps

10

13

1

1

1

1

2

1

0

0

Chromatid- aberrations

Breaks

18

24

1

2

0

1

0

3

1

1

Exchanges

19

23

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Chromosome- aberrations

Breaks

2

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Exchanges

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Others

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index [% mitotic nuclei]

2.30

1.95

4.45

4.60

3.50

2.85

2.60

2.45

2.25

2.60

Total Numbers of aberrations, including gaps

49

62

2

3

1

3

2

4

1

1

Total Numbers of aberrations, excluding gaps

39

49

1

2

0

2

0

3

1

1

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, including gaps [%]

32

41

2

3

1

2

2

4

1

1

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, excluding gaps [%]

27 a

36 a

1

2

0

2

0

3

1

1

a sum of replicates: p < 0.001

Table 7.6.1 -B2 Results of Chromosome Aberration Test – Experiment 1 with metabolic activation
(4 h exposure to SDDC, harvest 24 h after start of exposure, 1% S9)

total incidences in 100 cells scored

CP
10 µg/mL

Solvent control

SDDC [µg/mL]

44.75

89.5

134.28

Replicate

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

Cytotoxicity  

(Mitotic inhibition > 50 %)

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Gaps

7

17

2

4

2

0

3

0

3

1

Chromatid- aberrations

Breaks

12

19

0

0

0

0

2

0

3

0

Exchanges

4

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chromosome- aberrations

Breaks

3

3

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

Exchanges

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Others

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index [% mitotic nuclei]

1.70

1.75

3.65

3.70

2.90

3.55

2.05

1.90

1.55

1.40

Total Numbers of aberrations, including gaps

26

43

3

4

2

0

5

1

7

1

Total Numbers of aberrations, excluding gaps

19

26

1

0

0

0

2

1

4

0

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, including gaps [%]

19

32

3

4

1

0

5

1

7

1

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, excluding gaps [%]

16 a

19 a

1

0

0

0

2

1

4

0

a sum of replicates: p < 0.001

Table 7.6.1 -B3 Results of Chromosome Aberration Test – Experiment 2 without metabolic activation
(24 h continuous exposure to SDDC prior to cell harvest)

total incidences in 100 cells scored

MMC a
0.2 µg/mL

Solvent control

SDDC [µg/mL]

11.19

16.79

22.38

44.75 b

Replicate

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

Cytotoxicity  

(Mitotic inhibition > 50 %)

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Gaps

8

8

0

1

0

0

1

1

2

0

Chromatid- aberrations

Breaks

20

18

0

0

1

1

3

1

0

0

Exchanges

15

12

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

Chromosome- aberrations

Breaks

3

3

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

Exchanges

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Others

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index [% mitotic nuclei]

1.90

2.30

4.95

6.55

5.15

4.40

3.35

6.20

2.80

3.20

1.05

1.30

Total Numbers of aberrations, including gaps

46

41

0

1

2

1

4

3

5

1

Total Numbers of aberrations, excluding gaps

38

33

0

0

2

1

3

2

3

1

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, including gaps [%]

34

25

0

1

2

1

4

3

4

1

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, excluding gaps [%]

29 d

23 d

0

0

2

1

3 c

2 c

3

1

a slide evaluation terminated at 50 cells because approximately 50% cells with aberrations had been observed

b toxic

c sum of replicates: p < 0.05

d sum of replicates: p < 0.001

Table 7.6.1 -B4 Results of Chromosome Aberration Test – Experiment 1 with metabolic activation
(4 h exposure to SDDC, harvest 24 h after start of exposure, 2% S9)

total incidences in 100 cells scored

CP
10 µg/mL

Solvent control

SDDC [µg/mL]

11.19

22.38

44.75

89.5

Replicate

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

A

B

Cytotoxicity  

(Mitotic inhibition > 50 %)

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Gaps

15

6

0

0

0

1

3

4

1

2

1

2

Chromatid- aberrations

Breaks

25

15

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

Exchanges

17

9

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Chromosome- aberrations

Breaks

6

0

0

1

1

0

5

3

1

0

0

0

Exchanges

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Others

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mitotic index [% mitotic nuclei]

1.85

1.50

5.60

6.95

5.10

5.45

6.25

5.30

3.80

2.75

2.15

1.55

Total Numbers of aberrations, including gaps

63

31

0

2

1

1

8

7

2

2

3

2

Total Numbers of aberrations, excluding gaps

48

25

0

2

1

0

5

3

1

0

2

0

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, including gaps [%]

41

18

0

2

1

1

6

5

2

2

3

2

Frequency of Aberrant Cells, excluding gaps [%]

31 a

15 a

0

2

1

0

3

1

1

0

2

0

a sum of replicates: p < 0.001

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative