Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2001
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study performed under GLP standards

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001
Report date:
2001

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study conducted according to OECD Guideline 406 for skin sensitisation that predates adoption of OECD 429 in 2010.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
tert-butyl hydroperoxide
EC Number:
200-915-7
EC Name:
tert-butyl hydroperoxide
Cas Number:
75-91-2
Molecular formula:
C4H10O2
IUPAC Name:
2-methylpropane-2-peroxol
Details on test material:
Aqueous solution of TBHP (tertiary butyl hydroperoxide solution (70%))
- TBHP content 70%
- Physical state: clear colourless liquid
- Lot/batch No.: SGS REF 534326

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Hall, England
- Age at study initiation: circa 3 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 215 - 262g
- Housing: in a mobile battery, containing 6 cages; maximal 10 animals per cage.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Standard laboratory diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: 7 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3 C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70% (occasionally up to 100% for a short period, because of wet cleaning of the room or meteorological circumstances).
- Air changes (per hr): ca. 10 air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light/12hours dark cycle.


IN-LIFE DATES: From: 26 June 2001 To: 20 July 2001

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
10 male guinea pigs; induction with intradermal injection on day 1 of Freunds Complete Adjuvant (FCA) 1:1 diluted with isotonic saline, a 1% test dilution of TBHP-70 in physiological saline and 1% test dilution of TBHP in FCA followed by topical induction on day 8 with 30% TBHP; challenge 14 days after with 3% TBHP (Day 22).
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
10 male guinea pigs; induction with intradermal injection on day 1 of Freunds Complete Adjuvant (FCA) 1:1 diluted with isotonic saline, a 1% test dilution of TBHP-70 in physiological saline and 1% test dilution of TBHP in FCA followed by topical induction on day 8 with 30% TBHP; challenge 14 days after with 3% TBHP (Day 22).
No. of animals per dose:
15 male guinea pigs were randomly divided into 2 groups, one test group of 10 males and one control group of 5 males.
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
The irritation response to intradermal injection of various concentrations of the test substance was examined in 2 guinea pigs. Amounts of 0.1 mL of the selected concentrations were applied by intradermal injection. 24 hours post injection, animals were examined for signs of irritation. A concentration causing slight to moderate irritation but otherwise well-tolerated by the animals (1% Aq. TBHP-70) was chosen for intradermal injection in the induction phase of the main study.

The irritation reponse to topical treatment of various concentrations of the test substance was examined in 2 other guinea pigs. Patches were loaded with the test material and placed on the clipped skin of each animal and covered with a piece of hypoallergenic paper bandage that was secured by the elastic adhesive bandage wound around the torso of the animal. The dressing was left in place for 24 hours. 24-48 after removal of the dressing, the animals were examined for signs of skin irritation. A concentration causing slight to moderate skin irritation is usually chosen for topical induction and a non-irritant concentration for topical challenge.

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 10
- Exposure period: Topical induction - 48 hour exposure
- Test groups: 1 (10 animals)
- Control group: 1 (5 animals)
- Site: Dorsal skin
- Duration: Topical induction for 48 hours then topical challenge on day 14.
- Concentrations: 1% TBHP-70


B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 10
- Day(s) of challenge: 22
- Exposure period: Topical challenge - 24 hour exposure
- Test groups: 1 (10 animals)
- Control group: 1 (5 animals)
- Site: Dorsal skin
- Concentrations: 3% test concentration of TBHP-70



Challenge controls:
Physiological saline
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Formaldehyde

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Challenge treatment with 10% and 3% test dilution of formaldehyde (37%) induced positive reactions in 100% and 60% of the test animals respectively.

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3% TBHP-70
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3% TBHP-70. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3% TBHP-70
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3% TBHP-70. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
negative control
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: negative control. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
3% formaldehyde
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 3% formaldehyde. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
3% formaldehyde
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 3% formaldehyde. No with. + reactions: 3.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
10% formaldehyde
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 10% formaldehyde. No with. + reactions: 4.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
10% formaldehyde
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 10% formaldehyde. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Clinical observations:

Induction

Intradermal injections caused the following skin reactions:

1) In test animals:

- FCA/saline (1:1): moderate erythema

- selected test concentration: no skin reactions

- selected test concentration in FCA/diluent (1:1): moderate erythema

2) Control animals

- FCA/saline (1:1): moderate erythema

- vehicle: no skin reactions

- FCA/diluent (1:1): moderate erythema

Challenge

After the challenge treatment with the 3% test concentration of Aq. TBHP-70, slight moderate or severe erythema was observed in six test animals at 24 hours after challenge. At 48 hours after challenge, the 6 test animals showed moderate or severe erythema at the test site. The controls did not show any skin reactions.

Table 1 Skin scores in the test group (challenged with 3% TBHP-70).

Skin scores obtained 24 and 48 hours after removal of the dressing. 
Animal No. 24 hours 48 hours
Control group
22 0 0
24 0 0
26 0 0
28 Sacrified in extremis, unrelated to test article application
30 0 0
Test group
2 1 2
4 2 3
6 2 3
8 0 0
10 3 3
12 0 0
14 2 2
16 0 0
18 2 3
20 0 0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Aq. TBHP-70 caused skin sensitisation reactions in the test Guinea pigs. The induction and challenge regime employed corresponded to to TBHP treatment at 0.7% and 2.1% (induction) and 21% (challenge). It is therefore concluded that TBHP caused delayed contact sensitisation in Guinea pigs and must be considered to be a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

TBHP caused delayed contact sensitisation in Guinea pigs and must be considered to be a skin sensitiser. Under EC Regulation 1272/2008, TBHP is classified as a skin sensitizer Category 1A.