Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 292-334-0 | CAS number: 90604-40-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
Bioconcentration factor in fish: moderate (BCF = 67-340 based on log Kow regression, BCF = 510-1000 based on Arnot-Gobas method including biotransformation rate estimates), range for C12 - C15 based on linear structural isomers, estimated using QSAR.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- BCF (aquatic species):
- 1 000 L/kg ww
Additional information
No reliable guideline-standard measured bioconcentration studies are available for Alcohols, C12-15-branched and linear. In accordance with Section 2 of REACH Annex XI, the study does not need to be conducted because guideline-standard studies of bioaccumulation in fish would be confounded by the technical difficulties of maintaining the test substance in solution. As was demonstrated in the long-term studies of effects of close structural analogues in invertebrates (see Section 6.1.4), severe difficulties were encountered in conducting the study due to biodegradation (including metabolism) of the test substances in the test system was almost complete within the 24 h test media renewal period. Similarly the long-term study in fish conducted with the structurally analogous alcohol decan-1-ol required substantial method development work to overcome severe difficulties maintaining the test substance in the test system (see Section 6.1.2).
There is no requirement in REACH to conduct any secondary poisoning assessment, in view of the consistent lack of systemic toxic effects of the alcohols across this category to mammals. In addition, the rapid biodegradation of the substance, combined with evidence of rapid metabolism in fish, mammals and micro-organisms (Mankura (1987), and see Sections 7.1, 6.1.4), suggest that it is unlikely that bioaccumulation would be seen in studies.
BCF value of 67 -340 have been calculated using SRC BCFBAF v3.01 (2010) for C12 - C15 based on linear structural isomers. This model uses a log Kow-based equation with modified algorithms for specific structural features. This version of the software also incorporates for the first time a modification for biotransformation in vivo, producing BCF values ranging between 510 - 1000 for lower, mid and upper trophic levels again across the range of constituents. These considerations suggest that it is unlikely that significant bioaccumulation would be exhibited in nature.
Discussion of trends in the Category of C6-24 linear and essentially-linear aliphatic alcohols:
All the reviewed data indicate that log Kow-based QSARs overestimate BCF because they take no account of biotransformation and metabolism of alcohols by a wide range of biota from bacteria to mammals (Veenstra et al., 2009; Mudge, 2008). These observations have recently been critically assessed using cellular biotransformation assays of ethoxylated alcohols and other aliphatic surfactants which confirm that metabolism of the alkyl chain can lower BCF by orders of magnitude (Dyer et al., 2008; Cowan-Ellsberry et al., 2008). For the more soluble chain lengths, evaluated in non-guideline BCF studies on linear alcohols and guideline studies for branched alcohols, predicted BCFs are overestimated by at least an order of magnitude (Fisk et al., 2012).
Values predicted for 2-methyl branched alcohols are fairly consistent with the predicted values for the linear structures of the same carbon number based on BCFBAF v3.0 estimates, with small variations only associated with small margins of variation in the log Kow value. The presence of branched constituents is therefore not expected to significantly affect the predicted values; multiply-branched alcohols have been demonstrated to be metabolised ca. 2.5 times less efficiently by pig liver enzyme homogenate than linear structures of the same carbon number (Menzel et al., 2001, in which different isomeric forms of C12 saturated alcohols were studied as well as C14 linear alcohol), but a single branch is unlikely to have a significant impact.
For the multi-constituent/UVCB long chain alcohols, a single BCF value is difficult to predict. However the values for the constituents present are relevant. There is ample experimental in vivo evidence of metabolism in various trophic levels. Rapid biotransformation into tissue lipids has been demonstrated by Mankura (1987) in fish (carp), for oleyl alcohol (C18, unsaturated). Biotransformation of linear structures has been demonstrated to be faster than for multiply-branched structures (Menzel et al., 2001) in accordance with expectations based upon the metabolic pathways. Predicted bioconcentration factors, using methods which take account of the expected metabolism in vivo, estimate low BCF values. Experimental studies using structural analogues show low BCF values. All linear alcohols in this chain length range are readily biodegradable in reliable standard studies.
BCF can be calculated using SRC BCFBAF v3.01 (2010). This model uses a log Kow-based equation with modified algorithms for specific structural features. This version of the software also incorporates for the first time a modification for biotransformation in vivo. These considerations suggest that it is unlikely that bioaccumulation would be exhibited in nature for alcohols in the C6-24 linear and essentially-linear alcohols category.
It is therefore concluded that the long-chain alcohols in this category are non-bioaccumulative. This conclusion is considered to be sufficiently well-supported to justify no need for further testing in fish, since vertebrate testing for the purposes of REACH registration should be avoided where adequate existing evidence exists, and in view of the expected severe technical difficulties in conducting such a test.
Further information can be found in the attached position paper.
References:
Cowan-Ellsberry, C.E., Dyer, S.D., Erhardt, S., Bernhard, M.J., Roe, A.L., Dowty, M.E., Weisbrod, A.V., 2008. Approach for extrapolating in vitro metabolism data to refine bioconcentration factor estimates. Chemosphere 70, 1804–1817.
Dyer, S.D., Bernhard, M.J., Cowan-Ellsberry, C., Perdu-Durand, E., Demmerle, S., Cravedi, J.-P., 2008. In vitro biotransformation of surfactants in fish. Part I: Linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (C12-LAS) and alcohol ethoxylate (C13EO8). Chemosphere 72, 850–862.
Peter Fisk Associates Limited (2012) Position paper: Bioaccumulation of Aliphatic Alcohols in the context of REACH registration. Reference: PFA.197.018.002. Date: 10 August 2012.Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
