Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-703-0 | CAS number: 1474044-75-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- August 09, 2012 - November 12, 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH (Harlan CCR), In den Leppsteinswiesen 19, 64380 Rossdorf, Germany
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of 1H-Benzotriazole-1-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-6-methyl- and 2H-Benzotriazole-2-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-5-methyl- and N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole-1-methylamine and 2H-Benzotriazole-2-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-4-methyl- and N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole-1-methylamine
- EC Number:
- 939-700-4
- Molecular formula:
- Unspecified
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of 1H-Benzotriazole-1-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-6-methyl- and 2H-Benzotriazole-2-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-5-methyl- and N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-4-methyl-1H-benzotriazole-1-methylamine and 2H-Benzotriazole-2-methanamine, N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-4-methyl- and N,N-bis(2-ethylhexyl)-5-methyl-1H-benzotriazole-1-methylamine
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - State of aggregation: liquid
- Storage conditions: Room temperature; avoid temperatures < 0°C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- HPRT
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- The V79 cell line (supplied by Laboratory for Mutagenicity Testing; Technical University, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany) are stored in liquid nitrogen in the cell bank of Harlan CCR allowing the repeated use of the same cell culture batch in experiments. Before freezing, the level of spontaneous mutants was depressed by treatment with HAT-medium. Each batch is screened for mycoplasm contamination and checked for karyotype stability and spontaneous mutant frequency. Consequently, the parameters of the experiments remain similar because of the reproducible characteristics of the cells.
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum (FBS), neomycin (5 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (1 %).
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- See any other information on materials and methods incl. tables.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- On the day of the experiment (immediately before treatment), the test item was dissolved in ethanol. The solvent was chosen based on solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. The final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium was 0.5 % (v/v).
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 24 hours
- Exposure duration: In the first experiment the treatment period was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation. The second experiment was performed with a treatment time of 4 hours with and 24 hours without metabolic activation.
- Expression/fixation time: Three or four days after treatment 1.5x10^6 cells per experimental point were sub-cultivated in 175 cm² flasks containing 30 mL medium. Following the expression time of 7 days five 80 cm² cell culture flasks were seeded with about 3 - 5x10^5 cells each in medium containing 6-TG. Two additional 25 cm² flasks were seeded with approx. 500 cells each in non-selective medium to determine the viability.
The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % CO2 for about 7-10 days. The colonies were stained with 10 % methylene blue in 0.01 % KOH solution.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The study was performed in two independent experiments, using identical experimental procedures.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: The stained colonies with more than 50 cells were counted. In doubt the colony size was checked with a preparation microscope.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Toxicity of the test item is indicated by a reduction of the cloning efficiency (CE). - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability of the Assay
The gene mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
The numbers of mutant colonies per 10^6 cells found in the solvent controls falls within the laboratory historical control data.
The positive control substances should produce a significant increase in mutant colony frequencies.
The cloning efficiency II (absolute value) of the solvent controls should exceed 50 %.
The data of this study comply with the above mentioned criteria.
Evaluation of Results
A test item is classified as positive if it induces either a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency or a reproducible and positive response at one of the test points.
A test item producing neither a concentration-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A positive response is described as follows:
A test item is classified as mutagenic if it reproducibly induces a mutation frequency that is three times above the spontaneous mutation frequency at least at one of the concentrations in the experiment.
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase of the mutation frequency. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
However, in a case by case evaluation this decision depends on the level of the corresponding solvent control data. If there is by chance a low spontaneous mutation rate within the laboratory's historical control data range, a concentration-related increase of the mutations within this range has to be discussed. The variability of the mutation rates of solvent controls within all experiments of this study was also taken into consideration. - Statistics:
- A linear regression (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item were compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance was considered together.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS GENOTOXICITY:
No relevant and reproducible increase in mutant colony numbers/10^6 cells was observed in the main experiments up to the maximum concentration. The mutant frequency remained well within the historical range of solvent controls.
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies. A p-value below 0.05 was detected in culture I of the first experiment with metabolic activation and in culture II of the second experiment without metabolic activation. These trends however, were judged as biologically irrelevant as the mutation frequency remained well within the range of the historical solvent controls.
In both experiments of this study (with and without S9 mix) the range of the solvent controls was from 8.8 up to 25.0 mutants per 10^6 cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 3.8 up to 35.3 mutants per 10^6 cells.
EMS (150 μg/mL) and DMBA (1.1 μg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
The range finding pre-experiment was performed using a concentration range of 39.1 to 5000 μg/mL according to the current OECD guideline 476 to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 hours treatment) and absence (4 hours and 24 hours treatment) of metabolic activation. Relevant cytotoxic effects were observed at 78.1 μg/mL and above after 4 hours treatment without metabolic activation and at 156.3 μg/mL with metabolic activation. Following 24 hours treatment the cell growth was completely inhibited down to the lowest concentration.
The test medium was checked for precipitation or phase separation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) prior to removal to the test item. Phase separation was observed at 625 μg/mL and above in the presence of metabolic activation following 4 hours treatment and at 312.5 mg/mL and above in the absence of metabolic activation following 24 hours treatment.
Based on the results of the pre-experiment, the individual concentrations of the main experiments were selected. A series of concentrations generally spaced by a factor of 2 was applied. Narrower spacing was used at high concentrations with metabolic activation to cover the onset of cytotoxicity more closely.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative cloning efficiency I and/or a relative cell density below 50% in both cultures were observed in the first experiment at 78.0 μg/mL with metabolic activation. In the second experiment cytotoxic effects as described above occurred at 10.0 μg/mL without metabolic activation. The recommended cytotoxic range of approximately 10-20% relative cloning efficiency I or relative cell density was covered without metabolic activation. In the presence of metabolic activation moderate cytotoxic effects were noted in the first experiment with metabolic activation at the highest analysable concentration of 78 μg/mL with metabolic activation. Exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects occurred at the next higher, phase separating concentration of 156 μg/mL. In the second experiment with metabolic activation turbidity observed at the maximum concentration of 120 μg/mL indicated that the limit of solubility was reached. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experimental Result:
concentration (µg/ml) | PST | S9 Mix | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | relative cloning efficiency I (%) | relative cell density (%) | relative cloning efficiency II (%) | mutant colonies / 106cells | induction factor | |
Experiment I / 4h treatment | culture I | culture II | |||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 8.8 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 25.0 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150.0 | - | 101.7 | 122.4 | 92.9 | 98.5 | 11.2 | 85.8 | 146.3 | 74.5 | 157.8 | 6.3 | |
test item | 0.16 | - | 110.4 | culture was not continued# | 95.1 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.31 | - | 110.2 | culture was not continued# | 87.9 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.63 | - | 119.0 | 117.1 | 83.0 | 14.7 | 1.7 | 87.9 | 102.1 | 128.4 | 14.4 | 0.6 | |
test item | 1.3 | - | 111.1 | 119.7 | 88.1 | 7.9 | 0.9 | 97.6 | 112.3 | 111.7 | 25.2 | 1.0 | |
test item | 2.5 | - | 114.4 | 97.7 | 77.6 | 19.5 | 2.2 | 98.2 | 72.9 | 123.4 | 10.1 | 0.4 | |
test item | 5.0 | - | 122.6 | 100.2 | 86.2 | 20.1 | 2.3 | 100.0 | 52.6 | 124.7 | 14.6 | 0.6 | |
test item | 10.0 | - | 96.7 | 56.5 | 78.8 | 19.5 | 2.2 | 66.8 | 45.2 | 99.2 | 25.6 | 1.0 | |
solvent control (ethanol) | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 18.0 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 22.7 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 62.8 | 91.9 | 41.4 | 1579.1 | 87.7 | 59.3 | 104.1 | 73.7 | 1200.1 | 52.9 | |
test item | 9.8 | + | 102.2 | 106.8 | 84.3 | 15.5 | 0.9 | 98.4 | 93.5 | 89.1 | 22.0 | 1.0 | |
test item | 19.5 | + | 97.0 | 123.0 | 94.6 | 17.8 | 1.0 | 92.2 | 93.5 | 101.9 | 15.7 | 0.7 | |
test item | 39.0 | + | 99.7 | 113.1 | 98.4 | 19.3 | 1.1 | 96.8 | 85.8 | 82.0 | 23.2 | 1.0 | |
test item | 78.0 | + | 44.1 | 68.1 | 70.2 | 25.7 | 1.4 | 54.0 | 41.5 | 56.4 | 35.3 | 1.6 | |
test item | 156.0 | PS | + | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | ||||||
test item | 234.0 | + | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | |||||||
Experiment II / 24h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 12.5 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.3 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (EMS) | 150.0 | - | 89.7 | 113.2 | 91.1 | 364.3 | 29.1 | 89.7 | 96.8 | 72.9 | 368.9 | 25.9 | |
test item | 0.31 | - | 98.8 | culture was not continued# | 101.3 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 0.63 | - | 100.6 | 114.7 | 76.7 | 21.8 | 1.7 | 98.2 | 88.5 | 124.6 | 7.8 | 0.5 | |
test item | 1.3 | - | 98.9 | 109.6 | 178.7 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 98.5 | 83.5 | 95.2 | 7.0 | 0.5 | |
test item | 2.5 | - | 95.8 | 118.0 | 89.8 | 25.2 | 2.0 | 96.1 | 100.1 | 130.8 | 9.4 | 0.7 | |
test item | 5.0 | - | 77.6 | 107.9 | 122.0 | 17.6 | 1.4 | 72.9 | 75.8 | 79.1 | 11.4 | 0.8 | |
test item | 10.0 | - | 21.1 | 18.3 | 87.8 | 29.2 | 2.3 | 23.8 | 15.2 | 82.0 | 26.6 | 1.9 | |
test item | 20.0 | - | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | 0.0 | culture was not continued## | |||||||
Experiment II / 4h treatment | |||||||||||||
solvent control (ethanol) | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.5 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 14.7 | 1.0 | ||
positive control (DMBA) | 1.1 | + | 83.9 | 80.9 | 87.3 | 544.1 | 37.6 | 79.3 | 78.5 | 71.8 | 577.2 | 39.3 | |
test item | 5.0 | + | 100.4 | culture was not continued# | 92.6 | culture was not continued# | |||||||
test item | 10.0 | + | 101.1 | 86.0 | 103.7 | 15.0 | 1.0 | 89.6 | 93.6 | 91.5 | 18.5 | 1.3 | |
test item | 20.0 | + | 99.6 | 88.9 | 100.8 | 17.0 | 1.2 | 86.3 | 100.0 | 88.2 | 18.8 | 1.3 | |
test item | 40.0 | + | 93.8 | 78.5 | 108.7 | 15.6 | 1.1 | 93.5 | 108.0 | 54.8 | 20.5 | 1.4 | |
test item | 80.0 | + | 94.9 | 79.2 | 101.2 | 18.1 | 1.3 | 94.3 | 103.4 | 69.9 | 32.8 | 2.2 | |
test item | 120.0 | T | + | 94.9 | 75.6 | 113.8 | 16.6 | 1.1 | 88.2 | 100.0 | 70.4 | 24.3 | 1.7 |
PS = Phase Separation visible at the end of treatment
T = Turbidity
# culture was not continued as a minimum of only four concentrations is required
## culture was not continued due to exceedingly severe cytotoxic effects
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce gene mutations at the HPRT locus in V79 cells.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.