Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
August 9; 1990 - November 9, 1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1990

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
CIBA-GEIGY Limited, Toxicology Services, Dermatotoxicology, 4002 Basel / Switzerland
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
A valid maximization study with guinea pigs is available, no further animal studies are necessary

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Benzotriazol, ar-methyl-, reaction product with formaldehyde and Diethanolamine
EC Number:
939-703-0
Cas Number:
1474044-75-1
Molecular formula:
C16H19N - C28H43N (main constituents)
IUPAC Name:
Benzotriazol, ar-methyl-, reaction product with formaldehyde and Diethanolamine
Details on test material:
- Analytical purity: no data
- Physical state: liquid (soluble in water)
- Storage conditions: room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: Pirbright White (Tif: DHP)
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ciba Geigy Ltd., Tierfarm, Stein, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 363 g to 461 g
- Housing: individually in Macrolon cages (type 3)
- Diet: standard guinea pig pellets, NAFAG No. 845, Gossau SG; ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
1%
Day(s)/duration:
1 week
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
30%
Day(s)/duration:
48h
Challenge
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
10%
Day(s)/duration:
24h
No. of animals per dose:
20 (10 males, 10 females)
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
1, 3 and 5% suspensions of the test substance in saline was tested intradermally in separate animals. Because necrosis were induced with the 3 and 5% concentrations, the 1% concentration was used for the intradermal induction injections.
30, 10 and 3% of the test substance in vaseline have been examined on separate animals for the evaluation of the primary irritant potential and the maximum subirritant concentration. The tested concentrations did not induce erythema reactions. 30% was therefore selected for the epidermal induction application. 10% was used as subirritant concentration for the challenge application because a higher concentration may lead to nonspecific reactions in adjuvant treated animals.

MAIN STUDY
A1. INDUCTION EXPOSURE (intradermal, first week)
- No. of exposures: 3 pairs of injections (0.1 mL per injection) were made simultaneously
- Test groups: a) adjuvant/saline mixture 1:1 (v/v); b) test article in physiological saline (w/v); c) test article in the adjuvant saline mixture (w/v)
- Control group: as test group, but without test article
- Site: shaved neck
- Concentrations: 1% in physiological saline

A2. INDUCTION EXPOSURE (epidermal, second week)
- No. of exposures: one week after intradermal induction, 1 epidermal induction with test substance (patch: 2 x 4 cm, occlusive)
- Exposure period: 48 h
- Test groups: 0.4 g test substance in vaseline
- Control group: vehicle only
- Site: same site as intradermal induction (neck)
- Concentrations: 30% in vaseline
- Preparation: The application sites were pretreated the day before with 10% sodium lauryl sulfate.

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE (week 5)
- No. of exposures: 2 epidermal challenges (challenge and rechallenge) with test substance in vaseline and the vehicle alone (patch: 2 x 2 cm, occlusive)
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: vehicle alone and test article
- Control group: vehicle alone and test article
- Site: flank
- Concentrations: 10% in vaseline
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 h after removal of the dressing
A second challenge (same procedure) was performed one week after the first challenge to confirm the results.

OTHER: body weight was recorded at the start and end of the test.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Phenylendiame (strain is checked every 6 months)

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
20
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
9
Total no. in group:
20
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Any other information on results incl. tables

Results of test group after challenge and rechallenge treated with 10% of the test article

Males

Animal number

Challenge

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

24 h

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

48 h

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

Edema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

Re-Challenge

 

24 h

Erythema

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

48 h

Erythema

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2s

0

0

Edema

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

 

Females

Animal number

Challenge

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

24 h

Erythema

1

2

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Edema

1

2

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

48 h

Erythema

1

2s

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

Edema

1

2

1

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

Re-Challenge

 

24 h

Erythema

1

2

0

0

2

2

0

1

0

1

Edema

1

2

0

0

2

2

0

1

0

2

48 h

Erythema

1s

2s

0

0

1s

1

0

1s

0

1s

Edema

1

2

0

0

2

2

0

1

0

2

s = scaling

Body weight gain was in the normal range in all groups.

After challenge 25% of the animals showed positive results. After the rechallenge 45% of the animals showed positive results, indicating that the test substance has a sentitising potential.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (indication of skin sensitising potential) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
25 % of the animals were sensitised after the standard challenge application. After a second challenge the sensitising potential of the test substance was confirmed; the incidence of positive animals increased to 45 %. As a result, the test article requires classification for skin sensitization according to CLP and DSD.