Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-055-4 | CAS number: 3710-84-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 003
- Report Date:
- 2003
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 486 (Unscheduled DNA Synthesis (UDS) Test with Mammalian Liver Cells in vivo)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- unscheduled DNA synthesis
Test material
Reference
- Name:
- Unnamed
- Type:
- Constituent
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Diethylhydroxylamine
- Analytical purity: 86.605% aqueous solution
- Purity test date: 3rd June 2002
- Lot/batch No.: HS010101
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: June 2003
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (UK) Ltd, Margate, UK.
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 198-238 g (males)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: in groups of no more than four animals of the same sex, in solid-floored cages,
cleaned
- Diet (ad libitum): Special Diets Services Ltd, RM1.(E).SQC.
- Water (ad libitum): bottled water (public
supply)
- Acclimation period: 5/6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-22
- Humidity (%): 52-91
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- purified water
- Details on exposure:
- - dose volume: 10 mL/kg.
- Frequency of treatment:
- single administration
- Post exposure period:
- 2-4 hour or 12-14 hour
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 and 800 mg/kg
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 4
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- 2-Acetamidofluorene (2-AAF) for the 12-14 hour experiment and dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) for the 2-4 hour experiment.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Hepatocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
Available information indicated that the LD50 value for Diethylhydroxylamine was greater than 2000 mg/kg (the maximum recommended dose for the UDS assay). Accordingly, a confirmatory range-finder study was performed at 2000 mg/kg. Additionally, both male and female animals were tested in the range-finder study to determine any substantial inter-sex differences in toxicity.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):
In the main study groups of four male rats were treated once with the vehicle (purified water), Diethylhydroxylamine (at 800 mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg) or the required positive control, by oral gavage, at a dose volume of 10 mL/kg. The positive controls used were 75 mg/kg 2-acetamidofluorene (2-AAF) suspended in corn oil (12-14 hour experiment) and 10 mg/kg dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) dissolved in purified water (2-4 hour experiment).
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
- Killing of animals and preparation of hepatocyte cultures
For Experiments 1 and 2, animals were sacrificed a nominal 2-4 hours and 12-14 hours after dosing, respectively.
Individual animals were anaesthetized with Halothane and maintained under deep anaesthesia to prevent any likelihood of recovery. The liver was surgically exposed, the hepatic portal vein and superior vena cava cannulated with suitable cannulars and the liver perfused with suitable buffers. Approximately 400 mL of calcium free Buffer 1 was pumped at a flow rate of approximately 40 mL/min to wash the liver free of blood. The liver was then perfused with Buffer 2 also at a flow rate of 40 mL/min for approximately 5 minutes. Both buffers were gassed with 5% CO2 in air (v/v) prior to use and Buffer 2 throughout perfusion.
Calcium and collagenase (approximately 50 mg of collagenase dissolved in 1 mL of 769 mM CaCl2 and 10 mL of Buffer 2) was added to the reservoir and after one to two minutes the waste line was placed in the Buffer 2 reservoir so that the perfusate recirculates and the flow rate was reduced to 20 mL/min. When the reticular pattern of the liver had begun to break up and the liver became 'spongy', the perfusion was stopped. The liver was cut free into a suitable container with Buffer 2. The liver was transferred to a sterile dish, cut open and the hepatocytes carefully teased out. The resulting hepatocyte suspension was gently washed through 150 mm nylon mesh with Williams E medium-Complete (WE-C) to a volume of approximately 100 mL. Of this suspension, approximately 50 mL was taken and centrifuged at approximately 40 x 'g' for two to three minutes. The resultant pellet was resuspended in WE-C. The centrifugation and resuspension procedure was repeated at least twice and the pellet resuspended finally in approximately 20 mL WE-C. A sample (0.5 mL) of this suspension was taken, diluted with an equal volume of 0.4% (w/v) trypan blue in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the proportion of viable cells (those with unstained nuclei) determined using an haemocytometer. The culture was diluted where possible to provide approximately 1.5 x 105 viable cells/mL. Three mL of hepatocyte suspension was added to each well of a six-well multiplate containing 25 mm round plastic coverslips and incubated at 37°C ± 1°C in a 5% CO2 in air (v/v) atmosphere for at least 90 minutes to allow cells to attach.
- Radiolabelling of hepatocyte cultures
Medium was removed from the cells and the monolayers washed with 2 mL Williams E medium-Incomplete (WE-I) which was then replaced with 2 mL WE-I containing 10 mCi/mL [3H] thymidine. After 4 hours incubation at 37°C in a 5% CO2 in air (v/v) atmosphere, the medium was removed and the cells washed with three changes of WE-I containing 0.25 mM thymidine. Cultures were then incubated overnight with 3 mL of the same medium.
To prepare for autoradiography, coverslips were washed with 2 mL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the cells fixed with three changes of 2 mL glacial acetic acid:ethanol (1:3 v/v). The coverslips were then washed four times with purified water, allowed to dry and mounted onto previously labelled microscope slides, cells side up, with DPX.
- Autoradiography
Three of the six slides from each animal were coated in Ilford K2 liquid emulsion using a dipping technique. Each slide was dipped individually into the molten emulsion, ensuring that no air-bubbles were generated. After gelling over ice, for 10 minutes face upwards, the slides were incubated in a light-tight box at room temperature for approximately 90 minutes to let the emulsion dry. The slides were then packed in light-tight boxes containing desiccant, sealed with tape and refrigerated for 14 days. At the end of this time, the emulsion was developed in Kodak D19 developer and fixed using Ilford Hypam fixer. The cell nuclei and cytoplasm were then stained with Meyers haemalum/eosin Y. Slides were then dehydrated in ethanol, cleared in xylene and mounted with coverslips for microscopic examination. The spare, duplicate sets of slides were not required.
- Grain counting
Grain counting was performed using a microscope with a video camera connected to an image analysis system (Perceptive Instruments) and a computer programmed for automatic data capture.
Each slide was examined to ensure that the culture was viable. A patch of cells was selected as a starting point and cells were scored in a regular fashion by bringing new cells into the field of view, moving only in one axis. If the desired number of cells had not been scored before coming to the edge of the slide, the stage was moved one or two fields on the other axis and counting resumed. The circular field was centred over the nucleus of a suitable cell and the grains counted. The field of view was moved and counts obtained for three separate adjacent areas of cytoplasm. Nuclear and mean cytoplasmic grain counts were then recorded, and the net grains/nucleus (NNG) determined. 100 cells were analysed per animal, where possible using two of the three slides in each case. - Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were used for cell analysis:
1. only cells with normal morphology were scored
2. isolated nuclei with no surrounding cytoplasm were not scored
3. cells without nuclear and/or cytoplasmic graining were not scored
4. cells with unusual staining artefacts were not scored
5. heavily labelled cells in S-phase were not scored
6. all other normal cells, 100 per animal were scored
7. all slides were analysed blind (coded).
Treatment of data
The following were calculated for each slide, animal and dose point:
1. the population average NNG and standard deviation (SD)
2. the percent of cells responding or in repair (ie ³ 5 NNG)
3. the population average cytoplasmic and nuclear grain count.
Acceptance criteria
The study would be considered valid if the negative control animals had a group mean NNG value that did not exceed the upper limit of the historical range. The positive control treatments should have group mean values of five or more NNG with 50% or more cells having NNG counts of five or greater.
Evaluation criteria
The test article would be considered as positive in this assay if, at any dose and at either time point:
1. the test article yielded group mean NNG values greater than 0 NNG and 20% or more of cells responding (mean NNG values >= 5)
2. an increase above solvent control levels was seen in both NNG and the percentage of cells in repair.
Cytoplasmic and nuclear grain count values as well as the concurrent negative control data would be considered in relation to the overall NNG values of cultures from treated animals.
If the test article failed to induce UDS at any dose tested after both 2-4 and 12-14 hours exposure, it would be considered clearly negative in this system. - Statistics:
- None
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
In the range-finder study, groups of three male and three female out bred Han Wistar (Crl:WI (Glx/BRL/Han) BR) rats were dosed once with up to 2000 mg/kg Diethylhydroxylamine. During a 2 day post-dose observation period male animals dosed at 2000 mg/kg showed clinical signs of eye closure, piloerection, lethargy and weight loss. Female animals dosed at 2000 mg/kg showed clinical signs of eye closure, piloerection, lethargy, abnormal gait and being cold to the touch. However, due to the severity of these signs the female animals were killed in extremis. Therefore, a further three female animals were dosed at 1400 mg/kg and acceptable clinical signs including piloerection, lethargy, abnormal gait, being cold to the touch and weight loss were observed. Accordingly, as no substantial inter-sex differences in toxicity were observed, male animals only were tested in the main study at a maximum dose of 2000 mg/kg. A lower dose level of 800 mg/kg (40% of the maximum dose) was also selected.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
Clinical signs observed in the main study included piloerection and lethargy (2-4 hour experiment, 2000 mg/kg dose group). In the 12-14 hour experiment slight weight loss was observed (2000 mg/kg dose group). Approximately 2-4 hours (Experiment 1) or 12-14 hours (Experiment 2) after dosing, animals were sacrificed and their livers perfused with collagenase to provide a primary culture of hepatocytes. Cultures were made from three animals in each dose group and were treated with [3H] thymidine. Six slides from each animal were prepared with fixed hepatocytes and of these, three were dipped in photographic emulsion to prepare autoradiograms. Slides were examined microscopically after development of the emulsion and staining, and the net grain count (NNG), the number of grains present in the nucleus minus the mean number of grains in three equivalent areas of cytoplasm, was determined for each of two of the three slides, each animal and dose group. Negative (vehicle) control animals gave a group mean NNG value of less than 0.2 with only 0 to 1% cells in repair. Group mean NNG values were increased by 2-AAF and DMN treatment to 2.9 or more with more than 20% cells found to be in repair. It may be noted that the Experiment 1 vehicle control NNG value was slightly higher than normal (0.2), however this value is within the negative historical control range and therefore acceptable. Additionally, although the positive control response for DMN was lower than normal (falling outside of historical range), the response was considered to be clearly indicative of UDS. Accordingly, in this study the vehicle control NNG value was consistent with both published and historical control data, and the system was shown to be sensitive to two known DNA damaging agents requiring metabolism for their action. The assay was therefore accepted as valid. Treatment with 800 or 2000 mg/kg Diethylhydroxylamine did not produce a group mean NNG value greater than zero nor were any cells found in repair at either dose.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- When treated once via oral gavage with Diethylhydroxylamine at doses up to 2000 mg/kg male Han Wistar rats showed no induction of UDS in hepatocytes isolated ex vivo approximately 2-4 or 12-14 hours after dosing. It is concluded that Diethylhydroxylamine had no genotoxic activity detectable in this test system under the experimental conditions employed.
- Executive summary:
Diethylhydroxylamine was tested for its ability to induce unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) in the livers of orally dosed male rats using anin vivo/in vitroprocedure. Information available indicated that the LD50value for Diethylhydroxylamine was greater than 2000 mg/kg (the maximum recommended dose for the UDS assay). Accordingly, a confirmatory range-finder study was performed at 2000 mg/kg. Additionally, both male and female animals were tested in the range-finder study to determine any substantial inter-sex differences in toxicity. In the range-finder study, groups of three male and three female out bred Han Wistar (Crl:WI (Glx/BRL/Han) BR) rats were dosed once with up to 2000 mg/kg Diethylhydroxylamine. During a 2 day post-dose observation period male animals dosed at 2000 mg/kg showed clinical signs of eye closure, piloerection, lethargy and weight loss. Female animals dosed at 2000 mg/kg showed clinical signs of eye closure, piloerection, lethargy, abnormal gait and being cold to the touch. However, due to the severity of these signs the female animals were killedin extremis. Therefore, a further three female animals were dosed at 1400 mg/kg and acceptable clinical signs including piloerection, lethargy, abnormal gait, being cold to the touch and weight loss were observed. Accordingly, as no substantial inter-sex differences in toxicity were observed, male animals only were tested in the main study at a maximum dose of 2000 mg/kg. A lower dose level of 800 mg/kg (40% of the maximum dose) was also selected.
In the main study groups of four male rats were treated once with the vehicle (purified water), Diethylhydroxylamine (at 800 mg/kg or 2000 mg/kg) or the required positive control, by oral gavage, at a dose volume of 10 mL/kg. The positive controls used were 75 mg/kg 2-acetamidofluorene (2-AAF) suspended in corn oil (12-14 hour experiment) and 10 mg/kg dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) dissolved in purified water (2-4 hour experiment). Clinical signs observed in the main study included piloerection and lethargy (2-4 hour experiment, 2000 mg/kg dose group). In the 12-14 hour experiment slight weight loss was observed (2000 mg/kg dose group). Approximately 2-4 hours (Experiment 1) or 12-14 hours (Experiment 2) after dosing, animals were sacrificed and their livers perfused with collagenase to provide a primary culture of hepatocytes. Cultures were made from three animals in each dose group and were treated with [3H] thymidine. Six slides from each animal were prepared with fixed hepatocytes and of these, three were dipped in photographic emulsion to prepare autoradiograms. Slides were examined microscopically after development of the emulsion and staining, and the net grain count (NNG), the number of grains present in the nucleus minus the mean number of grains in three equivalent areas of cytoplasm, was determined for each of two of the three slides, each animal and dose group.
Negative (vehicle) control animals gave a group mean NNG value of less than 0.2 with only 0 to 1% cells in repair. Group mean NNG values were increased by 2-AAF and DMN treatment to 2.9 or more with more than 20% cells found to be in repair. It may be noted that the Experiment 1 vehicle control NNG value was slightly higher than normal (0.2), however this value is within the negative historical control range and therefore acceptable. Additionally, although the positive control response for DMN was lower than normal (falling outside of historical range), the response was considered to be clearly indicative of UDS. Accordingly, in this study the vehicle control NNG value was consistent with both published and historical control data, and the system was shown to be sensitive to two known DNA damaging agents requiring metabolism for their action. The assay was therefore accepted as valid. Treatment with 800 or 2000 mg/kg Diethylhydroxylamine did not produce a group mean NNG value greater than zero nor were any cells found in repair at either dose.
It was concluded that Diethylhydroxylamine did not induce UDS detectable under the experimental conditions employed.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live2