Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 234-147-9 | CAS number: 10563-26-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: scientifically acceptable study (TS presumably contained unspecified impurities, only one post-treatment sample (after 48 hours), 2 treatments at 48 hours intervals, limited documentation)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- limited documentation, 2 treatments at 48 hours intervals, only one post-treatment sample (after 48 hours)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- chromosome aberration assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N'-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine
- EC Number:
- 234-147-9
- EC Name:
- N,N'-bis(3-aminopropyl)ethylenediamine
- Cas Number:
- 10563-26-5
- Molecular formula:
- C8H22N4
- IUPAC Name:
- (3-aminopropyl)({2-[(3-aminopropyl)amino]ethyl})amine
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): N-BAPED
- Physical state: yellow liquid
- Analytical purity: technical grade; 95%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): not specified
- Lot/batch No.: 21955-60-1 (Aldrich Chem Co Inc catalog number: 23,939-9)
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: animals from a randomly bred closed colony purchased from Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, MA
- Age at study initiation: not specified; adult male and female mice were used
- Weight at study initiation:
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ]
- Fasting period before study: not specified
- Housing: group-housed, 7 mice/cage
- Diet: not specified (a commercial diet was used); ad libitum
- Water: not specified (“water”); ad libitum
No additional detail provided
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: A set of mice was dosed with the solvent (filter sterilized 0.99% saline; intraperitoneal [IP] injection), which served as a negative control.
- Details on exposure:
- Dosing consisted of 2 intraperitoneal (IP) administrations of the test substance / positive control substances / vehicle.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- The initial dose was given at time-0 (i .e. immediately following the initial blood sampling). A second dose was given 48 hours thereafter.
- Post exposure period:
- 24 hoours; the final blood sample was obtained at 96 hours after the first injection.
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
ca. 119, 238 and 475 mg/kg bw (calculated from 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 µl/g bw assuming test substance density of 0.95 g/cm³)
Basis:
other: actual injected
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 7
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- other: An initial (0 hour; before dosing began) blood sample from each mouse provides an internal control for comparison with dosed blood (96 hour samples). These initial blood samples provided a mouse-specific control blood sample.
- Positive control(s):
- methylmethanesulfonate (MMS)
- Route of administration: IP
- Doses / concentrations: 100 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- polychromatic cell (PCE) of peripheral blood
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
The high dose was detetmined in a preliminary lethal dose study. In order to evaluate the lethal dose range, mice were dosed with the test material diluted in 0.9% sterile saline to the following concentrations: ca. 238, 594, 1188, 1782, and 2375 mg/kg bw (converted from 2.5, 1.875, 1.25, 0.625, and 0.25 μl/g bw). The mice were injected with 25 ml test substance/kg bw. Those animals which were injected with the 1.25 μl/g bw solution and higher did not survive, while all the others survived 96 hours. Therefore, the high dose was set at 0.5 μl/g bw (ca. 475 mg/kg bw), the medium dose at 0.25 μl/g bw (ca. 238 mg/kg bw) and the low dose at 0.125 μl/g bw (ca. 119 mg/kg bw).
A preliminary analysis of the PCE number was obtained in order to insure that stem cell toxicity was not a factor in the micronucleus assay.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
Blood cells were obtained from the tail vein of each mouse and collected in heparin. The blood samples were fixed with alcohol and were stained with dye solutions of Hoechst 33258 (DNA of the micronucleus) and propidium iodide (RNA of PCEs). With this dye combination, it was possible to provide a quantitative analysis of the number of RBCs, PCEs and micronucleated cells that are present in each sample. A fixed and stained blood sample from a malaria infected mouse was used during the instrument setup in order to evaluate the resolution of the signals.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
- The 0 and 96 hour blood samples were quantitatively analyzed by high speed flow cytometry (FCM; DNA of a micronucleus emit blue fluorescence, and RNA of polychromatic cells red). The stained cells were then excited with a 363 nm beam from a 5 watt Argon Ion laser focused to 20 microns at the sample stream. The fluorescence from each cell was collected by photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and the signal levels were stored in computer memory for later processing. In addition to obtaining fluorescence profiles of each cell, FCM simultaneously provided cell size information by determining the light scatter properties of each cell or combination of cells. By setting hardware or software gates, it was possible to exclude ("gate out") cells and/or debris from analysis and thus focus on those cells of specific interest (e.g. the number of micronucleated cells, PCEs, or RBCs present in a sample).
- For each mouse, the number of micronucleated cells was determined in 2000000 total blood cells 1000000 cells from the t-0 blood and 1000000 cells from the final blood [t-96] for each mouse. The MN cell count of each initial (0 hour) blood sample was compared with the corresponding 96 hour blood sample. - Evaluation criteria:
- A mean and standard deviation (SD) of the micronucleated cell counts (t=0 and t=96 hours) was provided for each set (i .e. each treatment group) of mice. In addition, the change between the t=0 and the t=96 hours values were provided for the micronucleated cells and the PCEs. A comparison of the means was done by statistical analysis.
- Statistics:
- The test substance induced effects were analysed by ANOVA, and a t-test was used to highlight the source of the variation.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- a significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed with all doses for the females and with the high dose for the males, but the variations within the test groups were very high.
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Summary of the results
Treatment group |
Sex |
Means of micronucleus (MNs) / polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) |
||||
MN and changes (MN96 hours– MN0 hour) |
PCEs |
|||||
0 hours value |
96 hours value |
Change |
0 hours value |
96 hours value |
||
Negative control |
Females |
1929 |
1982 |
53 |
2340 |
5606 |
Males |
2665 |
2699 |
34 |
2828 |
5826 |
|
Mean variation in both sexes |
44 |
|
|
|||
Low dose (119 mg/kg) |
Females |
2076 |
2356 |
280* |
2660 |
5700 |
Males |
2714 |
2812 |
99 |
2960 |
5700 |
|
Mean variation in both sexes |
189 |
|
|
|||
Medium dose (238 mg/kg) |
Females |
1997 |
2234 |
236* |
3052 |
6171 |
Males |
2621 |
2777 |
156 |
2764 |
5681 |
|
Mean variation in both sexes |
196 |
|
|
|||
High dose (475 mg/kg) |
Females |
2080 |
2338 |
258* |
2914 |
6173 |
Males |
2670 |
2905 |
234 |
2925 |
5783 |
|
Mean variation in both sexes |
246* |
|
|
|||
Positive control |
Females |
2013 |
5225 |
3212* |
2285 |
5298 |
Males |
2689 |
570 |
3071* |
2510 |
4554 |
|
Mean variation in both sexes |
3142 |
|
|
*: significant different from the negative control
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): positive
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.