Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 911-369-0 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
- Skin corrosion /irritation (in vivo): not irritating (method similar to OECD 404)
- Eye irritation (in vivo): not irritating (method similar to OECD 405)
- Respiratory irritation: not irritating (based on the non-irritant properties of skin and eyes)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 02-11-1976 - 13-12-1976
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 10 animals used; different scoring system; observation < 14 days (Reversibility check); positve and negative control substances used.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 9-12 weeks - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution): 100%
Controls:
Positive control: Cyclamen Aldehyde
Negative control: Diethyl Phthalate - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- at 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Number of animals:
- 10
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal
- % coverage: no data
- Type of wrap if used: Patches are prepared by heat-sealing 1" x 1" 24 ply gauze pads on to 1 1/4" x 1 1/4" squares of polythene sheeting which is then attached to 3 1/2" x 1" strips of adhesive tape. Test solutions are applied to a dry patch. The patches are firmly attached to ensure good contact between the skin and test substance.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): wiped clean
- Time after start of exposure:4 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: The sites are scored for erythema, oedema, cracking and scaling and any other feature using an 8-point anchored ordinate scale ranging from “a” (very slight) to “h” (severe). At the end of the test the reaction grades are converted to corresponding numerical scores which are used to calculate the total irritation score per animal, an overall score per treatment group, a mean irritation score per site, and a mean irritation score per site per day for each treatment group. A mean irritation ranking for each treatment group is also given.
Reaction Grades and Scores of erythema, oedema, cracking and scaling:
a marginal/very slight = 1
b slight = 2
c fairly distinct =3
d quite distinct = 4
e becoming well developed = 6
f well developed = 8
g becoming severe = 10
h severe = 12
STATISTICS:
The Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed Ranks Test, which considers the size and direction of differences between reactions is used to test the significance of differences between pairs of treatment groups. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 3
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: 10
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 10
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 6 and 9
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 6 and 9
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 1 and 8
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not fully reversible in 72 hours in 1/2 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 1 and 8
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not fully reversible in 72 hours in 5/6 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: Animal 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 10
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Under the conditions of this test the test substance produced slight to moderate irritation consisting of marginal to slight erythema and oedema with variable cracking and scaling ranging from slight to distinct. The test substance was significantly more irritant than the negative control, diethyl phthalate, which produced only a marginal response. The test ingredient was significantly less irritant than the positive control, cyclamen aldehyde, which produced well-developed erythema fairly distinct cracking and slight scaling.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not a skin irritant
- Remarks:
- according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008 and its amendments)
- Conclusions:
- In the in vivo rabbit skin irritation test according to OECD TG 404, the substance is not a skin irritant.
- Executive summary:
The skin irritation/corrosion potential of Cyclacet was investigated in a study similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion). In this Rabbit Covered Patch Skin Irritation Test, ten New Zealand White rabbits were exposed to the test substance for 4 hours under semi-occlusive conditions and reactions were scored after removal, and after 24, 48 and 72 hours. The test substance caused slight to moderate irritation, consisting of marginal to slight erythema and oedema with variable cracking and scaling ranging from slight to distinct. The mean erythema scores over the 24, 48 and 72 hour time period, were 1 (8 animals), 1.33 (1 animal) and 1.67 (1 animal). The mean edema scores over the 24, 48 and 72 hour time period, were 0 (2 animals), 0.33 (2 animals), and 1 (6 animals). As all animals had scorings below 2.3, the test substance is not considered to be a skin irritant.
Reference
Table 1: Skin irritation scoring from test report
|
4 h |
4 h |
24 h |
24 h |
48 h |
48 h |
72 h |
72 h |
Animal |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
1 |
A |
- |
B |
A |
B |
- |
B |
- |
2 |
A |
B |
B |
A |
B |
A |
B |
A |
3 |
B |
B |
C |
B |
A |
A |
A |
A |
4 |
A |
- |
B |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
5 |
A |
B |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
6 |
A |
- |
A |
- |
A |
- |
B |
- |
7 |
B |
B |
B |
B |
B |
B |
B |
A |
8 |
A |
- |
A |
- |
A |
- |
A |
A |
9 |
A |
- |
A |
- |
B |
- |
A |
- |
10 |
A |
A |
C |
B |
C |
A |
B |
- |
Er = Erythema; Ed = Edema
Table 2: Recalculated scoring system based on proposed conversion (see any other information on materials and methods).
|
4 h |
4 h |
24 h |
24 h |
48 h |
48 h |
72 h |
72 h |
Mean 24/48/72h |
Mean 24/48/72h |
Animal |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
Er |
Ed |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0.33 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1.33 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0.33 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1.67 |
1 |
Er = Erythema; Ed = Edema
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09-05-1977 - 31-05-1977
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- different scoring system
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Modified Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Method
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
- Concentration (if solution): 100% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- at 15 min., 1, 2, and 3 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
-
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: 2, 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: 2, 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 2 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: 2 and 3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The test substance caused slight corneal lesions affecting up to half of the corneal surface in two animals. One of these lesions was associated with moderate corneal swelling, slight conjunctivitis and discharge. The lesions had healed within three days. The remaining animal was unaffected. One animal showed signs of discomfort when treated.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not an eye irritant
- Remarks:
- according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008 and its amendments)
- Conclusions:
- The test substance is not eye irritating.
- Executive summary:
The primary eye irritation potential of Cyclacet was investigated in a study similar to OECD Test Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion). A single administration of Cyclacet in the eye of 3 rabbits caused slight corneal lesions affecting up to half of the corneal surface in two animals. One of these lesions was associated with moderate corneal swelling, slight conjunctivitis and discharge. The lesions had healed within three days. The remaining animal was unaffected. One animal showed signs of discomfort when treated. Mean chemosis, conjunctivae and iris scores at the 24, 48, and 72 hour time point were 0.33 in 1 animals and 0 in the other two animals. The effects seen in the one animal was reversible within one day. Corneal opacity scores were 0.67, 0.33, and 0 for the three animals respectively. The corneal opacity was absent within three days. It is concluded that Cyclacet is not an eye iritant.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Skin irritation: The skin irritation/corrosion potential of Cyclacet was investigated in a study similar to OECD Test Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion). In this Rabbit Covered Patch Skin Irritation Test, ten New Zealand White rabbits were exposed to the test substance for 4 hours under semi-occlusive conditions and reactions were scored after removal, and after 24, 48 and 72 hours. The test substance caused slight to moderate irritation, consisting of marginal to slight erythema and oedema with variable cracking and scaling ranging from slight to distinct. The mean erythema scores over the 24, 48 and 72 hour time period, were 1 (8 animals), 1.33 (1 animal) and 1.67 (1 animal). The mean edema scores over the 24, 48 and 72 hour time period, were 0 (2 animals), 0.33 (2 animals), and 1 (6 animals). As all animals had scorings below 2.3, the test substance is not considered to be a skin irritant.
Eye irritation: The primary eye irritation potential of Cyclacet was investigated in a study similar to OECD Test Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion). A single administration of Cyclacet in the eye of 3 rabbits caused slight corneal lesions affecting up to half of the corneal surface in two animals. One of these lesions was associated with moderate corneal swelling, slight conjunctivitis and discharge. The lesions had healed within three days. The remaining animal was unaffected. One animal showed signs of discomfort when treated. Mean chemosis, conjunctivae and iris scores at the 24, 48, and 72 hour time point were 0.33 in 1 animals and 0 in the other two animals. The effects seen in the one animal was reversible within one day. Corneal opacity scores were 0.67, 0.33, and 0 for the three animals respectively. The corneal opacity was absent within three days. It is concluded that Cyclacet is not an eye irritant.
Respiratory irritation: For respiratory irritation mostly human data are used for the assessment because no suitable in vitro or in vivo tests are available that can identify respiratory irritation (ECHA guidance R.7.2.3 (2008) and ECHA guidance, 2017, page 240). There are no human data available that indicate respiratory reactions of the substance e.g. from consumer experience or occupational exposure. In addition the substance is not corrosive or severely irritating and therefore respiratory irritation is not considered a concern.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available corrosion and irritation information the substance does not need to be classified for skin, eye and irritation is not warranted according to EU CLP (EC 1272/2008 and its amendments).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
