Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 290-580-3 | CAS number: 90193-76-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Not full study report published; only data of C9-C11 alkyl phthalates were presented here;
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Groups of 22 timed-mated Sprague-Dawley rats were administered 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg D911P daily by oral gavage (5 mL/kg) between gestation days (GD) 1 and 19. Control animals received the vehicle (olive oil) alone. On GD20, the animals were sacrificed and the fetuses examined.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C9-11-branched and linear alkyl esters
- EC Number:
- 271-085-1
- EC Name:
- 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, di-C9-11-branched and linear alkyl esters
- Cas Number:
- 68515-43-5
- IUPAC Name:
- dioctyl phthalate
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): di-(C9-C11 alkyl) phthalate (D911P)
- Analytical purity: 99.3 % (m/m)
- Batch: PLA/S20517/97)
- Source: BP Chemicals Ltd., Hull
- storage: at ambient temperature
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK Ltd. (Margate, Kent).
- Age at study initiation: 10-11 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 210-267 g
- Diet: ad libitum SDS Laboratory Animal Diet No. 1, Special Diet Services Ltd, Witham, Essex
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%):55
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- olive oil
- Details on exposure:
- Dose volume: 5 mL/kg bw
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Proof of pregnancy: sperm-positive vaginal smear or at least three copulation plugs referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Gestational days 1-19
- Frequency of treatment:
- once a day
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 250, 500, and 1000 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice a day
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Bodyweight was measured daily throughout the study, and
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
food consumption was recorded for gestation days 1–2, 3–5, 6–8, 9–11, 12–14, 15–17, and 18–19.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
On GD20, the females were killed by carbon dioxide inhalation, weighed, and examined macroscopically for signs of disease or adverse reaction to treatment. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The reproductive tracts, including ovaries, were removed and assessed for gravid uterine weight, number of corpora lutea in each ovary, numbers of implantation and resorption sites, and number and distribution of fetuses in each uterine horn.
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: No data
Fetuses were uniquely identified with respect to their position in the uterine horn. Each fetus was weighed, sexed, examined for external abnormalities, and euthanized by chilling on a cool plate at approximately 4°C. Each placenta was weighed and examined for abnormalities. Approximately half of each litter was allocated to skeletal examination. These fetuses were given a visceral examination prior to evisceration and fixation in industrial methylated spirit. They were then processed and stained with Alizarin Red, using a modification of the Dawson staining technique. The remainder of the fetuses were fixed in Bouin’s fluid prior to examination by the Wilson free-hand serial sectioning technique. - Statistics:
- Homogeneity of variance was assessed using Bartlett’s test, and data were analyzed with parametric tests (analysis of variance followed by Williams’ test) or nonparametric tests (Kru´skal-Wallis followed by Shirley’s test) as appropriate. Data on fetal malformations and variations was analyzed using categorical data models. Significant differences between treatments and controls for the proportions of affected fetuses were determined using Wald x2 tests with Bonferroni’s adjustment for multiple testing applications. Trend analysis was performed using logistic regression to separate spurious results from the statistically significant effects of an increased dosage level. For litter data, the litter was generally taken as being the unit for analysis. Since most distributions were nonnormal, nonparametric analysis was routinely used.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
Treatment resulted in no signs of maternal toxicity, as assessed by adjusted maternal bodyweight gain throughout gestation, clinical examinations and food consumption. There were no remarkable macroscopic findings in the maternal animals at necropsy.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
Results (fetuses)
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Treatment resulted in no effects upon litter size, fetal survival or bodyweight. Fetal, litter, and placental weights were all unaffected by treatment with D911P, and there was no effect upon the overall incidence of external or visceral abnormalities.
There was a significant increase in dilated renal pelves in pups of the high dose groups.
Increased incidences of rudimentary supernumerary lumbar ribs at 500 and 1000 mg/kg bw /d.
These rudimentary supernumerary ribs, defined as being less than 50% the length of the 13th rib, are a common skeletal variation that occurs spontaneously at a high frequency in rats.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Remarks on result:
- other: not specified
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1
Selected foetal observations following treatment with D911P from GD1 to GD19
|
0 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
Historical Controld |
No. examined viscerallya |
165 (22) |
162 (22) |
157 (22) |
153 (21) |
|
No. examined ekeletallya |
168 (22) |
158 (22) |
158 (22) |
157 (2!) |
|
Visceral findingsb |
|||||
dilated ureter |
3 (3) [1.8] |
11 (5) [8.6] |
4 (3) [2.4] |
11 (7) [7.7] |
1.9-1.3% (13.6-45.5%) |
dilated renal pelvisc |
2 (2) [1.0] |
7 (3) [4.1] |
2 (1) [1.3] |
12 (5) [7.9*]‡ |
|
hydroureterc |
0 [0.0] |
10 (6) [6.9] |
1 [0.6] |
8 [3] [5.3] |
|
Skeletal findingsb |
|||||
lumbar ribs (13/14 or 14/14) |
23 (13) [13.6] |
24 (10) [15.9] |
45 (17) [28.2**] |
40 (14) [26.7*]‡ |
8.5-16.5% (33.3-72.7%) |
cervical ribs |
0 [0.0] |
2 (2) [1.2] |
4 (3) [2.5] |
0 [0.0] |
0.0-2.0% (0.4-4.8%) |
complete 14thribs |
0 |
0 |
2 (1) |
1 |
|
aData represent the number foetuses (litters) examined in each group.
bData represent the number foetuses (litters) affected in each group, and [foetus affected per litter (%)].
cData from foetuses processed for skeletal examination.
dRange of control incidences from 9 studies in Sprague-Dawley rats conducted at the same laboratory over the preceding 18 months. Control animals received olive oil (5 studies), water (1 study), Tween 80 (1 study), or 1% aqueous methylcellulose (2 studies).
* p < 0.05 compared to control
** p < 0.01 compared to control
‡Significance for trend, p < 0.01
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, D911P has no potential to adversely affect development in the rat. Administration of doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day throughout gestation induced no detectable toxicity in the dams, and resulted only in minor skeletal and visceral variations (non-adverse). There was no evidence of malformations following treatment. The NOAEL for maternal and developmental toxicity is therefore established at 1000 mg/kg/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.