Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

The classification of the key parameter is based on results of the study " IFM 1981d" (Dunkin-Hartley guinea pigs, Magnusson Kligmann test + pretest) considered to be reliable with restrictions (Klimisch score 2). No further studies are available. Therefore the substance is deemed not to be a skin sensitizer.

After challenge application three males and five females exhibited a grade 1 (slight) erythema after 24h. This cutaneous reaction persisted in the same males and in only three females at the 48-hour examination time. No cutaneous reactions were observed in other animals.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
The potential of the substance to induce delayed contact hypersensitivity was investigated using the Maximization method of Magnusson and Kligman. The test item was found to be non-sensitising (Gobron, 1981d)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Additional information:

No information on the sensitising potential of the substance via the inhalation route is available. As Dinoram SL is not considered as a sensitizer via the dermal route the risk that the substance is a respiratory sensitizer is regarded as negligible.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
- No information on the sensitising potential of the substance via the inhalation route is available.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Skin sensitisation:

According to the results of the guinea-pig maximization test and the criteria laid down in EU regulation (EC) n°1272/2008 (CLP) and EU Directive 67/548/EEC, the substance is not classified for skin sensitisation.

Respiratory sensitisation:

No information on the sensitising potential of the substance via the inhalation route is available. As the substance is not considered as a sensitizer via the dermal route the risk that the substance is a respiratory sensitizer is regarded as negligible. Based on this reasoning the substance does not need to be classified for respiratory sensitization according tothe criteria laid down in EU regulation (EC) n°1272/2008 (CLP) and EU Directive 67/548/EEC.