Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 309-912-6 | CAS number: 101357-15-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09 May 2018 to 18 May 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The experimental design is compatible with the guideline requirements, but only one bacterial strain was used in the study as requested by the Sponsor
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The experimental design is compatible with the guideline requirements, but only one bacterial strain was used in the study as requested by the Sponsor
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The experimental design is compatible with the guideline requirements, but only one bacterial strain was used in the study as requested by the Sponsor
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Benzenamine, reaction products with aniline hydrochloride and nitrobenzene
- EC Number:
- 309-912-6
- EC Name:
- Benzenamine, reaction products with aniline hydrochloride and nitrobenzene
- Cas Number:
- 101357-15-7
- Molecular formula:
- This is a UVCB substance. See section 1.2 for individual components.
- IUPAC Name:
- Benzenamine, reaction products with aniline hydrochloride and nitrobenzene
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Description: Black powder
- Storage Conditions: Controlled room temperature (15-25 ºC, below 70 RH %)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Tryptophan requirement in the Escherichia coli strain.
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: MOLTOX - Molecular Toxicology Inc., Boone, North Carolina, USA
- The strain was stored at -80 ± 10 ºC in the Culture Collection of the Microbiological Laboratory of the testing laboratory. Frozen permanent cultures of the tester strain was prepared from fresh, overnight cultures to which DMSO was added as a cryoprotective agent.
- The phenotype of the tester strain used in the bacterial reverse mutation assays with regard to UV sensitivity (uvrA), as well as spontaneous mutation frequencies are checked regularly according to Ames et al. and Maron and Ames.
- Spontaneous reversion of the test strain to tryptophan independence is measured routinely in mutagenicity experiments and is expressed as the number of spontaneous revertants per plate.
- The day before treatment, the frozen bacterial cultures were thawed at room temperature and 200 μL inoculum were used to inoculate each 50 mL of Nutrient Broth No.2 for the overnight cultures in the assay. The cultures were incubated for 10-14 hours at 37 °C in a Gyrotory water bath shaker.
The viability of each testing culture was determined by plating 0.1 mL of the 10^5, 10^6, 10^7 and 10^8 dilutions prepared by sterile physiological saline on Nutrient Agar plates. The number of viable cell of the cultures was determined by manual counting after approximately 24-hour incubation at 37 °C.
MEDIA USED
- Nutrient Broth No.2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- - 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5, 1.581 µg/plate
- Based on the results of the preliminary test, 100 mg/mL stock solution was prepared in DMSO, which was diluted by serial dilutions in several steps to obtain the dosing formulations for lower doses. The maximum test concentration was 5000 μg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- The solubility of the test material was examined using Distilled water, Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) and Acetone. The test material was insoluble in Distilled water at 100 mg/mL concentration. At the same concentration the test material was formed homogeneous suspension with Acetone. The test material was soluble at this concentration using DMSO and DMF (black colour solution was detected in each case). Due to the better biocompatibility, DMSO was selected as vehicle (solvent) for the study. The obtained stock solution (50 μL) with the solution of top agar and phosphate buffer was examined in a test tube without test bacterium suspension to examine the formulation compatibility.
- All dilutions in the main tests of test material were made in the testing laboratory using Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Test solutions were freshly prepared at the beginning of the experiments in the testing laboratory by diluting the stock solution using the selected solvent and were used within 2 hours after preparation.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene with activation (50 µg/plate)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION:
- The study included a Preliminary Compatibility Test, an Initial Mutation Test and a Confirmatory Mutation Test. In the Initial Mutation Test, the plate incorporation method was used. In the Confirmatory Mutation Test, the pre-incubation method was used.
INITIAL MUTATION TEST
- A standard plate incorporation procedure was performed as an Initial Mutation Test. Bacteria (cultured in Nutrient Broth No .2) were exposed to the test material both in the presence and absence of an appropriate metabolic activation system.
- Molten top agar was prepared and kept at 45 °C. The equivalent number of minimal glucose agar plates (three plates per test material concentration and for each control) was properly labelled. The test material and other components were prepared freshly and added to the overlay (45 °C).
- The content of the tubes: top agar 2000 μL, vehicle or test material formulation (or reference controls) 50 μL, overnight culture of test strain 100 μL and phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) or S9 mix 500 μL. This solution was mixed and poured on the surface of minimal agar plates. For activation studies, instead of phosphate buffer, 0.5 mL of the S9 mix was added to each overlay tube. The entire test consisted of non-activated and activated test conditions, with the addition of untreated, negative (solvent) and positive controls. After preparation, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 hours.
CONFIRMATORY MUTATION TEST
- A pre-incubation procedure was performed as a Confirmatory Mutation Test since in the Initial Mutation Test no positive effect was observed.
- For the pre-incubation method, bacteria (cultured in Nutrient Broth No. 2) were exposed to the test material both in the presence and absence of an appropriate metabolic activation system. The equivalent number of minimal glucose agar plates was properly labelled. Molten top agar was prepared and kept at 45 °C.
- Before the overlaying, 50 μL of the test material formulation or its vehicle (or 50 μL of positive reference controls or their solvents), 100 μL of the overnight culture of bacterial cells and 0.5 mL of the S9 mix (activated test conditions) or phosphate buffer pH 7.4 (non-activated test conditions) were added into appropriate tubes to provide direct contact between bacteria and the test material. The tubes (3 tubes per control and 3 tubes for each concentration level) were gently mixed and incubated for 20 minutes at 37 °C in a shaking incubator.
- After the incubation period, 2 mL of molten top agar were added to the tubes, and then the content mixed and poured on the surface of minimal glucose agar plates. The entire test consisted of non-activated and activated test conditions, with the addition of untreated, negative and positive controls. After preparation, the plates were incubated at 37 °C for approximately 48 hours .
EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA
- The colony numbers on the untreated / negative (solvent) / positive control and test material treated plates were determined by manual counting. Visual examination of the plates was also performed; precipitation or signs of growth inhibition (if any) were recorded and reported. The mean number of revertants per plate, the standard deviation and the mutation factor* values were calculated for each concentration level of the test material and for the controls using Microsoft ExcelTM software.
- Mutation factor (MF): mean number of revertants on the test material plate / mean number of revertants on the vehicle control plate.
Criteria for Validity:
The study was considered valid if:
- the number of revertant colonies of the negative (solvent) and positive controls were in the relevant historical control range in the main tests;
- at least five analysable concentrations were presented in the main tests. - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for a Positive Response:
A test material was considered mutagenic if:
- a dose–related increase in the number of revertants occurred and/or;
- a reproducible biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurred with or without metabolic activation.
An increase was considered biologically relevant if:
- the number of reversions was more than two times higher than the reversion rate of the negative (solvent) control.
Criteria for a Negative Response:
The test material was considered to have shown no mutagenic activity in this study if it produces neither a dose-related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the dose groups, with or without metabolic activation. - Statistics:
- According to the guidelines, statistical method may be used as an aid in evaluating the test results. However, statistical significance should not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- INITIAL AND CONFIRMATORY MUTATION TESTS
- In the Initial Mutation Test (using plate incorporation method), the highest revertant rate was observed at 1.581 μg/plate concentration without metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.33). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the observed mutation factor values were below the biologically relevant threshold limit and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
- In the Confirmatory Mutation Test (using the pre-incubation method), the highest revertant rate was observed at 1.581 μg/plate concentration with metabolic activation (the observed mutation factor value was: MF: 1.16). However, there was no dose-response relationship, the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent controls and the number of revertant colonies was within the historical control range.
- Higher numbers of revertant colonies compared to the vehicle (solvent) control were detected in the Initial Mutation Test in some other sporadic cases. However, no dose-dependence was observed in those cases and they were below the biologically relevant threshold value. The numbers of revertant colonies were within the historical control range in each case, so they were considered as reflecting the biological variability of the test.
- Precipitate/slight precipitate was observed on the plates in the main tests with and without metabolic activation at the concentrations of 5000, 1581, 500 and/or 158.1μg/plate.
- No inhibitory or toxic effects of the test material were detected in the main tests.
VALIDITY OF THE TESTS
- Untreated, negative (solvent) and positive controls were run concurrently. The mean values of revertant colony numbers of untreated, negative (solvent) and positive control plates were within the historical control range.
- The reference mutagens showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies with and without metabolic activation. The viability of the bacterial cells was checked by a plating experiment in each test.
- At least five analysable concentrations were presented of the main tests, the examined concentration range was considered to be adequate.
- The study was therefore, considered to be valid.
Any other information on results incl. tables
The solubility of the test material in DMSO
Concentration of Test Material in DMSO (mg/mL) |
Solubility in DMSO* |
Solubility in the Top Solution (Test Material Formulation 50 μL + Phosphate Buffer 500 μL + Top Agar 2 mL) |
Test material Concentration in the Test Tube (μg/tube) |
100 |
Solution |
Strong precipitate |
5 000 |
31.62 |
Solution |
Precipitate |
1 581 |
10 |
Solution |
Precipitate |
500 |
3.162 |
Solution |
Slight opalescence |
158.1 |
1 |
Solution |
Solution |
50 |
* The black colour of the test material formulations in the 100 – 0.1 mg/mL concentration range faded in a concentration-related manner.
Summary of the initial mutation test
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
Mean Value of Revertants/ Mutation Factor (MF) |
Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA |
|
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
Untreated control |
Mean |
42.7 |
43.7 |
MF |
1.13 |
0.92 |
|
DMSO control |
Mean |
37.7 |
47.3 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Distilled water |
Mean |
40.3 |
- |
MF |
1.07 |
- |
|
5 000 |
Mean |
44.3 |
45.7 |
MF |
1.18 |
0.96 |
|
1 581 |
Mean |
37.7 |
52.3 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.11 |
|
500 |
Mean |
42.3 |
50.3 |
MF |
1.12 |
1.06 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
40.7 |
56.7 |
MF |
1.08 |
1.20 |
|
50 |
Mean |
47.3 |
54.3 |
MF |
1.26 |
1.15 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
48.7 |
50.0 |
MF |
1.29 |
1.06 |
|
5 |
Mean |
46.0 |
57.3 |
MF |
1.22 |
1.21 |
|
1.581 |
Mean |
50.0 |
49.0 |
MF |
1.33 |
1.04 |
|
2AA (50 μg) |
Mean |
- |
232.7 |
MF |
- |
4.92 |
|
MMS (2 μL) |
Mean |
1049.3 |
- |
MF |
26.02 |
- |
Summary table of the confirmatory test
Concentrations (μg/plate) |
Mean Value of Revertants/ Mutation Factor (MF) |
Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA |
|
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
Untreated control |
Mean |
40.0 |
37.3 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
DMSO control |
Mean |
40.0 |
37.3 |
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Distilled water |
Mean |
40.0 |
- |
MF |
1.00 |
- |
|
5 000 |
Mean |
35.3 |
37.7 |
MF |
0.88 |
1.01 |
|
1 581 |
Mean |
34.0 |
41.7 |
MF |
0.85 |
1.12 |
|
500 |
Mean |
35.3 |
42.0 |
MF |
0.88 |
1.13 |
|
158.1 |
Mean |
39.7 |
36.3 |
MF |
0.99 |
0.97 |
|
50 |
Mean |
39.7 |
93.0 |
MF |
0.99 |
1.04 |
|
15.81 |
Mean |
37.0 |
38.7 |
MF |
0.93 |
1.04 |
|
5 |
Mean |
42.7 |
40.7 |
MF |
1.07 |
1.09 |
|
1.581 |
Mean |
38.7 |
43.3 |
MF |
0.97 |
1.16 |
|
2AA (50 μg) |
Mean |
- |
234.3 |
MF |
- |
6.28 |
|
MMS (2 μL) |
Mean |
1052.0 |
- |
MF |
26.30 |
- |
Initial mutation test (plate incorporation method): Cell count (overnight culture) 2.8 E+09 CFU/mL
Concentration (μg/plate) |
Revertant Colony Number |
||
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
5 000 |
|
46 P |
47 P |
|
40 P |
44 P |
|
|
47 P |
46 P |
|
Mean |
44.3 |
45.7 |
|
SD |
3.79 |
1.43 |
|
MF |
1.18 |
0.96 |
|
1 581 |
|
38 P |
55 P |
|
37 P |
48 P |
|
|
38 P |
54 P |
|
Mean |
37.7 |
52.3 |
|
SD |
0.58 |
3.79 |
|
MF |
1.00 |
1.11 |
|
500 |
|
44 SP |
47 SP |
|
39 SP |
52 SP |
|
|
44 SP |
52 SP |
|
Mean |
42.3 |
50.3 |
|
SD |
2.89 |
2.89 |
|
MF |
1.12 |
1.00 |
|
158.1 |
|
39 |
58 |
|
42 |
55 |
|
|
41 |
57 |
|
Mean |
40.7 |
26.7 |
|
SD |
1.53 |
1.53 |
|
MF |
1.08 |
1.20 |
|
50 |
|
48 |
57 |
|
51 |
48 |
|
|
43 |
58 |
|
Mean |
47.3 |
54.3 |
|
SD |
4.04 |
5.51 |
|
MF |
1.26 |
1.15 |
|
15.81 |
|
46 |
56 |
|
51 |
42 |
|
|
49 |
52 |
|
Mean |
48.7 |
50.0 |
|
SD |
2.52 |
7.71 |
|
MF |
1.29 |
1.06 |
|
5 |
|
46 |
58 |
|
48 |
56 |
|
|
44 |
58 |
|
Mean |
46.0 |
57.3 |
|
SD |
2.52 |
1.15 |
|
MF |
1.29 |
1.21 |
|
1.581 |
|
54 |
49 |
|
42 |
54 |
|
|
54 |
44 |
|
Mean |
50.0 |
49.0 |
|
SD |
6.93 |
5.00 |
|
MF |
1.33 |
1.04 |
|
Untreated control |
|
43 |
47 |
|
43 |
40 |
|
|
42 |
44 |
|
Mean |
42.7 |
43.7 |
|
SD |
0.58 |
3.51 |
|
MF |
1.13 |
0.92 |
|
DMSO control |
|
40 |
47 |
|
37 |
47 |
|
|
36 |
48 |
|
Mean |
37.7 |
47.3 |
|
SD |
2.08 |
0.58 |
|
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Distilled water control* |
|
42 |
45 |
|
40 |
48 |
|
|
39 |
48 |
|
Mean |
40.3 |
47.0 |
|
SD |
1053 |
1.73 |
|
MF |
10.7 |
0.99 |
|
Positive control MMS (2 μL) |
|
1080 |
- |
|
1044 |
- |
|
|
1024 |
- |
|
Mean |
1049.3 |
- |
|
SD |
28.38 |
- |
|
MF |
26.02 |
- |
|
Positive control 2AA (50 μL) |
|
- |
228 |
|
- |
238 |
|
|
- |
232 |
|
Mean |
- |
232.7 |
|
SD |
- |
5.03 |
|
MF |
- |
4.92 |
* Distilled water was used due to MMS.
P: Precipitate
SP: Slight precipitate
MF: Mutation factor
SD: Standard deviation
+S9: With S9 mix
-S9: Without S9 mix
Mutation factor = mean revertants (test material) / mean revertants (solvent control)
Confirmatory mutation test (Pre-incubation method): Cell count (overnight culture) 2.96 E+09 CFU/mL
Concentration (μg/plate) |
Revertant Colony Number |
||
-S9 |
+S9 |
||
5 000 |
|
34 P |
32 P |
|
37 P |
42 P |
|
|
35 P |
39 P |
|
Mean |
35.3 |
37.7 |
|
SD |
1.53 |
5.13 |
|
MF |
0.8 |
1.01 |
|
1 581 |
|
31 P |
41 P |
|
39 P |
47 P |
|
|
32 P |
37 P |
|
Mean |
34.0 |
41.7 |
|
SD |
4.36 |
5.03 |
|
MF |
0.85 |
1.12 |
|
500 |
|
35 SP |
42 SP |
|
32 SP |
45 SP |
|
|
39 SP |
39 SP |
|
Mean |
35.3 |
42.0 |
|
SD |
3.51 |
3.00 |
|
MF |
0.88 |
1.13 |
|
158.1 |
|
38 SP |
38 SP |
|
42 SP |
39 SP |
|
|
39 SP |
34 SP |
|
Mean |
39.7 |
36.3 |
|
SD |
2.08 |
2.52 |
|
MF |
0.99 |
0.97 |
|
50 |
|
39 |
42 |
|
41 |
37 |
|
|
39 |
38 |
|
Mean |
39.7 |
39.0 |
|
SD |
1.15 |
2.65 |
|
MF |
0.99 |
1.04 |
|
15.81 |
|
39 |
39 |
|
33 |
38 |
|
|
39 |
39 |
|
Mean |
37.0 |
38.7 |
|
SD |
3.46 |
0.58 |
|
MF |
0.93 |
1.04 |
|
5 |
|
44 |
29 |
|
47 |
46 |
|
|
37 |
47 |
|
Mean |
42.7 |
40.7 |
|
SD |
5.13 |
10.12 |
|
MF |
1.07 |
1.09 |
|
1.581 |
|
32 |
45 |
|
45 |
39 |
|
|
39 |
46 |
|
Mean |
38.7 |
43.3 |
|
SD |
6.51 |
3.79 |
|
MF |
0.97 |
1.16 |
|
Untreated control |
|
39 |
37 |
|
42 |
38 |
|
|
39 |
37 |
|
Mean |
10.0 |
37.3 |
|
SD |
1.73 |
0.58 |
|
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
DMSO control |
|
37 |
38 |
|
44 |
35 |
|
|
39 |
39 |
|
Mean |
40.0 |
37.3 |
|
SD |
3.61 |
2.08 |
|
MF |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Distilled water control* |
|
36 |
39 |
|
46 |
38 |
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
Mean |
40.0 |
38.7 |
|
SD |
529 |
0.58 |
|
MF |
1.00 |
1.04 |
|
Positive control MMS (2 μL) |
|
1024 |
- |
|
1088 |
- |
|
|
1044 |
- |
|
Mean |
1052.0 |
- |
|
SD |
32.74 |
- |
|
MF |
26.30 |
- |
|
Positive control 2AA (50 μL) |
|
- |
238 |
|
- |
221 |
|
|
- |
244 |
|
Mean |
- |
234.3 |
|
SD |
- |
11.98 |
|
MF |
- |
6.28 |
* Distilled water was used due to MMS.
P: Precipitate
SP: Slight precipitate
MF: Mutation factor
SD: Standard deviation
+S9: With S9 mix
-S9: Without S9 mix
Mutation factor = mean revertants (test material) / mean revertants (solvent control)
Historical control data (period of 2011 – 2017)
Untreated control data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
22.5 |
102.3 |
12.0 |
7.7 |
35.2 |
29.0 |
109.7 |
11.5 |
9.4 |
40.4 |
St. dev. |
5.6 |
20.3 |
4.8 |
3.5 |
10.8 |
6.8 |
19.2 |
3.7 |
3.9 |
10.4 |
Range |
9-50 |
54-210 |
1-46 |
1-26 |
11-82 |
10-56 |
65-204 |
1-39 |
1-29 |
16-89 |
n |
1650 |
1636 |
1647 |
1653 |
1662 |
1668 |
1656 |
1667 |
1671 |
1662 |
DMSO Control Data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
21.5 |
98.0 |
12.1 |
7.6 |
34.0 |
28.1 |
107.3 |
11.3 |
9.1 |
39.4 |
St. dev. |
5.5 |
19.7 |
4.7 |
3.4 |
10.5 |
6.9 |
20.2 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
10.3 |
Range |
6-55 |
40-217 |
1-43 |
1-27 |
7-81 |
11-67 |
53-229 |
2-33 |
1-29 |
9-85 |
n |
1770 |
1761 |
1770 |
1776 |
1779 |
787 |
1776 |
1790 |
1791 |
1782 |
Distilled Water Control Data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
23.3 |
101.7 |
12.1 |
8.5 |
36.2 |
29.7 |
109.7 |
11.3 |
9.9 |
41.5 |
St. dev. |
5.7 |
21.3 |
4.6 |
3.5 |
10.7 |
6.9 |
21.1 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
10.3 |
Range |
11-45 |
45-215 |
2-47 |
2-24 |
12-84 |
10-53 |
64-222 |
3-39 |
1-24 |
13-91 |
n |
351 |
1644 |
1650 |
357 |
1683 |
354 |
1668 |
1677 |
354 |
1677 |
DMF Control Data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
20.4 |
90.0 |
11.4 |
7.5 |
36.6 |
27.4 |
98.8 |
11.1 |
8.7 |
39.4 |
St. dev. |
5.3 |
17.0 |
4.4 |
3.4 |
12.8 |
6.9 |
18.4 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
10.6 |
Range |
8-38 |
54-152 |
1-34 |
1-19 |
16-99 |
11-49 |
60-156 |
3-21 |
1-23 |
17-76 |
n |
258 |
258 |
258 |
258 |
249 |
258 |
258 |
258 |
255 |
249 |
Acetone Control Data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
22.5 |
98.0 |
12.1 |
7.5 |
35.6 |
28.9 |
107.5 |
11.1 |
8.8 |
40.9 |
St. dev. |
5.1 |
15.1 |
5.8 |
3.0 |
9.7 |
6.7 |
14.5 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
9.2 |
Range |
11-39 |
62-160 |
4-49 |
1-17 |
17-63 |
15-52 |
66-177 |
4-22 |
1-19 |
17-70 |
n |
290 |
291 |
291 |
291 |
288 |
291 |
291 |
294 |
291 |
291 |
Positive Reference Control Data |
||||||||||
|
Without metabolic activation (-S9 mix) |
With metabolic activation (+S9 mix) |
||||||||
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
E. coli |
|
Mean |
363.9 |
1216.4 |
1167.3 |
447.3 |
1028.0 |
2409.2 |
2423.8 |
230.9 |
219.7 |
255.1 |
St. dev. |
105.6 |
193.5 |
188.7 |
155.7 |
133.5 |
290.5 |
267.0 |
123.9 |
51.7 |
104.1 |
Range |
152-2336 |
536-2120 |
208-2440 |
149-2104 |
488-1708 |
312-4918 |
1192-5240 |
101-2216 |
117-838 |
125-5212 |
n |
1650 |
1638 |
1647 |
1653 |
1665 |
1668 |
1656 |
1671 |
1671 |
1662 |
TA98: Salmonella typhimurium TA98
TA100: Salmonella typhimurium TA100
TA1535: Salmonella typhimurium TA1535
TA1537: Salmonella typhimurium TA1537
E coli: Escherichia coli WP2uvrA
n: Number of cases
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, the test material had no mutagenic activity on Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strain with or without activation.
- Executive summary:
The genetic toxicity of the test material was investigated in a study following the design of OECD 471, EU Method B.13/14 and OPPTS 870.5100. Although the experimental design is compatible with the guideline requirements, only one bacterial strain was used in the study as requested by the Sponsor. The testing was performed under GLP conditions.
The experiments were carried out using tryptophan-requiring auxotroph strain of Escherichia coli (Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA) in the presence and absence of a post mitochondrial supernatant (S9 fraction) prepared from the livers of phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone-induced rats.
The study included a Preliminary Compatibility Test, an Initial Mutation Test (Plate Incorporation Method) and a Confirmatory Mutation Test (Pre-Incubation Method).
Based on the results of the Compatibility Test, the test material was dissolved in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. The test material concentrations in the Initial Mutation Test and in the Confirmatory Mutation Test were 5000, 1581, 500, 158.1, 50, 15.81, 5 and 1.581 μg/plate.
In the Initial Mutation Test and Confirmatory Mutation Test, the number of revertant colonies did not show any biologically relevant increase compared to the solvent control. There were no dose-related trends and no indication of any treatment-related effect.
Precipitate/slight precipitate was observed on the plates in the main tests with and without metabolic activation at the concentrations of 5000, 1581, 500 and/or 158.1 μg/plate. The precipitation did not adversely affect the colony counting.
No inhibitory or toxic effects of the test material were detected in the study.
The mean values of revertant colonies of the negative (vehicle/solvent) control plates were within the historical control range, the reference mutagens showed the expected increase in the number of revertant colonies, the viability of the bacterial cells was checked by a plating experiment in each test. At least five analysable concentrations were presented of the main tests, the examined concentration range was considered to be adequate. The study was therefore, considered to be valid.
The reported data of this mutagenicity assay show that under the experimental conditions applied the test material did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes in the genome of the strain used.
Under the conditions of this study, the test material had no mutagenic activity on Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA strain with or without activation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.