Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 266-587-2 | CAS number: 67151-63-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation: Mallory VT (1984) determined in a K2, key study the skin corrosion potential of the test substance in New Zealand White rabbits according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404. The test substance was observed to be corrosive to the skin (category 1C).
Eye irritation: Mallory VT (1983) determined in a K1 study the eye irritation potential of the test substance in New Zealand White rabbits according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 405. The test substance was observed to be corrosive to the eyes (eye damage 1).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1984-02-27 to 1984-02-29
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well documented study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404 with a minor deviation: occlusive dressing used instead of semi-occlusive
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Occlusive dressing used instead of semi-occlusive
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 5601-23-1
- Substance type: Clear liquid
- Physical state: liquid - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Sgarlat's Rabbitry, Harvey's Lake, Pennsylvania
- Weight at study initiation: 2 - 3 kilograms
- Housing: Rabbits were housed individually in cages sized in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" of the Institute of Laboratory Resources, National Research Council.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light, 12 hours dark - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/stie - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- Animals were observed at 4 and 48 hours after application of the test material.
- Number of animals:
- Iniatially, two rabbits will be administered the test article. The test will be considered positive if both animals exhibit a positive response and the study will be terminated. If only one animal or no animals exhibit a positive response, the test will be repeated with a different group of two rabbits. If one animal exhibits a positive response in the second group, the test article will be considered corrosive and the study will be terminated provided there was no positive response in group I. If no positive reactions are observed in group II, an additional group of two rabbits will be added and conclusions will be based on a total of six rabbits.
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
Corrosion will be considered to have resulted if the substance in contact with the rabbit skin has caused destruction or irreversible alteration of the tissue on at least two out of each six rabbits tested. Tissue destruction is considered to have occurred if, at any of the readings, there is ulceration or necrosis. Tissue destruction does not include merely sloughing of the epidermis or erythema, edema or fissuring. - Irritation parameter:
- other: Skin necrosis
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 4h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Skin necrosis
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 4h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Skin necrosis
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Skin necrosis
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Skin corrosion (tissue destruction) was considered to have occurred if ulceration or necrosis was observed in any of the readings
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Skin necrosis was visible in both rabbits at 4 and 48 hours after application of the test article.
- Other effects:
- Skin corrosion (tissue destruction) was considered to have occurred if ulceration or necrosis was observed in any of the readings
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1C (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the results of the DOT Corrosivity Study in Rabbits, the test substance was considered to be corrosive.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1983-10-18 to 1983-01-01
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- Well documented GLP study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404. The test substance is applied to intact skin, but also to abraded skin. An occlusive dressing is used, instead of a semi-occlusive dressing.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The test substance is applied to intact skin, but also to abraded skin. An occlusive dressing is used, instead of a semi-occlusive dressing.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 5601-23-1
- Substance type: light yellow liquid
- Physical state: liquid
- Stability under test conditions: There was no apparent change in the physical state of the test article during administration. - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Perfection Breeders, Douglassville, Pennsylvania
- Weight at study initiation: 2 - 3 kilograms
- Housing: Rabbits were housed individually in cages sized in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" of the Institute of Laboratory Resources, National Research Council.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light, 12 hours dark - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: one abraded and one intact skin site
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/site - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- Animals were observed and signs of erythema and edema were scored according to the Draize scale at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 after application of the test material.
- Number of animals:
- 6 animals (3 males and 3 females)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Type of wrap if used: Following the application of the test material, one-inch square gauze patches were applied to each of the two sites. The trunk of the animal was wrapped with a rubber dam and an Ace bandage to retard evaporation. The test substance was kept in contact with the skin site for twenty-four hours.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): At the end of the twenty-four hour exposure period, the wrappings were removed and the remaining material was removed in a suitable manner.
SCORING SYSTEM:
The irritation was scored according to the technique of Draize JH (1959), The Appraisal of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs, and Cosmetics, pp 36-45. Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States. Austin, Texas. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Score:
- 5
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: time points include 24 and 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 24 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: abraded skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: intact skin
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 14 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: abraded skin
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Severe erythema was observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Very slight to slight edema was also observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Skin necrosis was also observed at the application sites throughout the study.The study was terminated on day 14.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Severe erythema was observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Very slight to slight edema was also observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Skin necrosis was also observed at the application sites throughout the study. According to the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the substance should be classified as category 2 skin irritant.
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- the study does not need to be conducted because the substance is a strong acid (pH ≤ 2.0) or base (pH ≥ 11.5) and the available information indicates that it should be classified as skin corrosion (Category 1, 1A, 1B or 1C)
Referenceopen allclose all
The pH of the test article was 12.5.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (corrosive)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1983-09-30 to 1983-10-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- Well documented GLP study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 405.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 5601-23-1
- Substance type: clear liquid
- Physical state: liquid
- Stability under test conditions: There was no apparent change in the physical state of the test article during administration - Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Sgarlat's Rabbitry, Harvey's Lake, Pennsylvania and Perfection Breeders, Douglassville, Pennsylvania
- Weight at study initiation: 2 - 3 kilograms
- Housing: Rabbits were housed individually in cages sized in accordance with the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals" of the Institute of Laboratory Resources, National Research Council.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours light, 12 hours dark - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The contralateral eye remained untreated and served as a control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The upper and lower lids were gently held together for one second to prevent loss of material.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 10, and 13 days after treatment. The grades of ocular reaction were recorded at each examination.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
Grading of irritation is according to the method of Draize, J.H., et al., J. Pharm, Exp. Ther. 82: 377 - 390 (1944).
An animal exhibited a positive reaction when the test substance produced one or more of the following signs:
ulceration of the cornea (other than a fine stippling), opacity of the cornea (other than a slight dulling of the normal luster), inflammation of the iris (other than a slight deepening of the rugae or a light hyperemia of the circumcorneal blood vessels), or an obvious swelling in the conjunctivae (excluding the cornea and iris) with partial eversion of the eyelids and a diffuse crimson color with individual vessels not easily discernible. - Irritation parameter:
- maximum mean total score (MMTS)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 48 hours
- Score:
- 95.3
- Max. score:
- 100
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Scoring after 1 hour: 2; No scoring possible after 24 hours due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: No scoring possible after 1 hour due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Scoring after 1 and 24 hours: 2. No scoring possible after 48 hours due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: No scoring possible after 1 hour due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Scoring after 1 and 24 hours: 2. No scoring possible after 48 hours due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Scoring after 1 hour: 2. No scoring possible after 24 hours due to high degree of opacity
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not reversible
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 13 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Positive ocular responses were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 7, 10 and 13. Rupture of the globe, conjunctival necrosis and red discharge were observed during the course of the study.
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- Positive ocular responses were recorded at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 7, 10 and 13. Rupture of the globe, conjunctival necrosis and red discharge were observed during the course of the study. Based on the results and the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the substance is classified as category 1 eye corrosive.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irreversible damage)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation / corrosion:
In a key, K1 DOT corrosivity study by Mallory VT (1984), 2 New Zealand White rabbits were exposed to 0.5 ml of undiluted test substance on clipped skin (equivalent to OECD guideline 404, K2, GLP). Exposure time was 4h under an occlusive dressing. The skin was observed after 4h and 48h. Skin necrosis was visible in both rabbits at 4 hours and 48 hours after application of the test article. This study was selected as key study.
In a supporting primary dermal irritation study by Mallory VT (1983) (K2, equivalent to OECD guideline 404, GLP), 6 rabbits were exposed to 0.5 ml of undiluted test substance on both intact and abraded skin. Exposure time was 24h under an occlusive dressing. Scoring according to Draize occurred after 24h and 72h, and after days 4 through 14. Necrosis was observed at 24 and 72 hours after treatment and on Days 4 through 14. Severe erythema was observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Very slight to slight edema was also observed at 24 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14. Skin necrosis was also observed at the application sites throughout the study. The study was terminated on day 14.
No in vitro skin irritation study needs to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available.
Eye irritation:
In a key acute eye irritation test by Mallory VT (1983) (equivalent to OECD guideline 405, K1, GLP), 6 rabbits were instilled 0.1 ml of undiluted test substance in one eye, while the other eye served as control. The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and 7, 10 and 13 days after treatment. Positive ocular responses were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on Days 7, 10 and 13. Rupture of the globe, conjunctival necrosis and red discharge were observed during the course of the study. The substance is considered to be corrosive to the eyes.
No in vitro eye irritation study needs to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data and the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the test substance is classified as skin corrosive category 1C (H314).
Based on the available data and the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the test substance is classified as corrosive to eyes (serious eye damage Cat. 1 (H318)). These classifications are however covered already within the classification for skin corrosion.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.