Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-222-2 | CAS number: 79-74-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- June 3 - September 25, 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The reported data are reliable with restrictions; quality and stability of the tested substance are not mentioned. The study is performed under GLP conditions. The used methods are well documented and seem equivalent to OECD Guideline 473.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- quality and stability of test substance was not defined
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Santovar A
- Substance type: white powder
- Physical state: solid
- Analytical purity: "production sample"
- Lot/batch No.: T860036
- Stability under test conditions: not mentioned
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- chromosomal aberrations
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Range-finding: 0, 5 µg/ml - 5 mg/ml
Assay with activation: 0, 5, 10, 15 µg/ml
Assay without activation: 0, 2, 5, 10 , 15 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- other: at all time-points, except at 48 h. fixation
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- at 48 hours positive control is lacking Migrated to IUCLID6: cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 18 - 24 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 6, 12, 24, 48 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): colchicine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 100 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; chromosomal aberrations - Evaluation criteria:
- not mentioned.
- Statistics:
- Chi-square analysis and Dunnett's t-test were used to analyze the number of cells with structural aberrations and structural aberrations per cell, respectively. Results were considered statistically significant at the probability level of p < 0.05. Linear regression of linear and log dose versus response was used to analyze for dose-response relationship. A statistically significant probability level of p<0.05 was used.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- not determined
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- only at highest dose at t=48 hours
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING
Cytotoxicity was observed at 10 µglml, as indicated by a lengthening of average cell generation time to approximately 24 hrs and 18 hrs for treatment in the absence and presence of activation, respectively.
SCREENING STUDIES:
Without activation:
Santovar A levels of 2, 5, 10 and 15 µg/ml were chosen as the highest four scorable doses. However, after scoring and decoding, the 15 µg/ml treatment group was found not to contain enough scorable cells (2 or less). The results are therefore not reported. A decrease in mitotic index was observed at 5 µg/ml and higher doses for 6 hours and 10 µg/ml for 12 hours, indicating that cytotoxic levels were tested. Statistically significant increases in percentage cells with structural aberrations and in average structural aberrations per cell were observed at the 10 µg/ml treatment level of Santovar A at the 48 hour harvest time. The aberrations were chromatid deletions and interchanges, and 3 chromosome-type exchanges. However, this response was entirely a factor of the high dose point. No increases were observed at any other lower dose levels.
With activation:
The Santovar A levels of 5, 10 and 15 µg/ml were selected as the three highest scorable doses. A decrease in mitotic index was observed at 15 µg/ml for 6 hours. A statistically significant increase in structural aberrations per cell was observed for the 10 µg/ml treatment group at the 6 hour harvest times. Since 92 metaphases were scored for this dose and all of the structural aberrations were found in one cell, this response was evaluated not to be a test-chemical related effect. This evaluation is supported by the negative responses observed at the other harvest times. No statistically significant dose-response relationship was observed at any harvest times.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The results of the chromosomal aberration assay in CHO cells suggest a negative tendency for 2,5-Di-t-pentylhydroquinone for inducing chromosomal aberrations in experiments with and without S9-activation during various incubation periods. - Executive summary:
Santovar A was tested for its potential to induce chromosomal aberrations in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. CHO cells were treated for 5 hours with 1, 2, 5, 10 and 15 μg/ml of the test chemical. The dose levels 2, 5, and 10 μg/ml were scored and reported in the absence of exogenous activation and 5, 10 and 15 μg/ml in the presence of exogenous activation (Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver homogenate). The cells were harvested at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after initiation of treatment. The harvest times were calculated for each treatment condition to allow the detection of effects of treatment at different cell cycle stages. In the non-activated study, statistically significant increases in percentage cells with structural aberrations and structural aberrations per cell were observed only for 10 μg/ml Sansovar A at the 48 hr harvest time. A statistically significant dose- response relationship was also observed at this harvest time. No statistically significant increases were observed for Santovar A treatment with activation. Under these conditions, Santovar A was concluded to be negative in the presence of metabolic activation. In the absence of activation, Santovar A was concluded to be a possible clastogen. However, because of the single dose level and time point of the response, and that the response was not observed in the presence of activation, the clastogenicity may not be relevant to the in vivo situation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Welcome to the ECHA website. This site is not fully supported in Internet Explorer 7 (and earlier versions). Please upgrade your Internet Explorer to a newer version.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.
Find out more on how we use cookies.