Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 618-804-0 | CAS number: 919-94-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The acute oral LD50 of TAEE is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw. The acute inhalation LC50 of TAEE is greater than 23.2 mg/l. The acute dermal LD50 is expected to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Available human data on acute inhalation toxicity of TAME and ETBE showed a lower NOAEC for ETBE compared to TAME. The data on ETBE show minor complaints of sensory effects and pulmonary function changes at 50 ppm (210 mg/m3). Based on these data a NOAEC of 25 ppm (105 mg/m3) is established for ETBE.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Value:
- 23 200 mg/m³ air
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Animal data
Acute oral toxicity was determined in a GLP compliant guideline study (acute toxic class method, Method B1 of Directive 2004/73/EC) using 6 young adult female Sprague Dawley rats (Covance Laboratories Ltd, 2009b). The test substance was administered neat as a single dose by gavage (2000 mg/kg bw) following an overnight fast, and the animals observed for 14 days post-treatment. Access to food recommenced approximately 3 hour post-treatment. There were no deaths noted following treatment and the animals gained weight normally. Piloerection was observed in the first group of 3 animals, 3 hour after dosing. Piloerection and hunched posture were present in the second group of 3 animals 3 hour after dosing, with piloerection and ataxia recorded 4 hour after dosing. No gross abnormalities were detected on study day 14. The results demonstrate that the acute oral LD50 of TAEE is greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Acute inhalation toxicity was determined in a GLP compliant guideline study (OECD 403) using young adult Wistar rats of both sexes, 5 males and 5 females (Covance Laboratories Ltd., 2009c). Animals were exposed nose-only to a single vapour concentration (23.2 mg/L) of the test substance (the achieved concentration was confirmed using GC-FID). One male died during exposure, and the survivors exhibited signs of mild CNS depression with a slight (3%) reduction in body weight. Treatment-related clinical signs included ataxia, bradypnoea, dyspnoea, hunched posture, prone and ptosis. One male exhibited decreased activity on Day 2. All animals appeared normal thereafter. There were no deaths during the 14 day follow-up period and no gross abnormalities detected in survivors at necropsy. The results demonstrate that the acute inhalation LC50 of TAEE is greater than 23.2 mg/L.
In an early, pre-guideline non-GLP experimental investigation (Marsh and Leake, 1950), groups of mice were exposed to TAEE vapour for 15 min until the concentration required to kill 9-11 of 20 exposed animals was identified. This concentration was considered to be the LC50, and found to be 81 mg/l (15 min exposure).
No data regarding the dermal route is available. However, Article 13 of the REACH legislation states that, in case no appropriate animal studies are available for assessment, information should be generated whenever possible by means other than vertebrate animal tests, i. e., applying alternative methods such as in vitro tests, QSARs, grouping and read-across. For the structural analogues of the substance, TAME (2-methoxy-2-methylbutane) and ETBE (2-ethoxy-2-methylpropane), data are available regarding acute dermal toxicity (analogue approach).
ETBE:
In a GLP complaint study performed according to a method comparable to OECD guideline 402, ETBE was applied at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw to the shaved dorsum of 5 male and 5 female White rabbits under occlusion for 24 hr. There were no deaths. The LD50 was determined to be > 2000 mg/kg bw (IIT Research Institute, 1989).
TAME:
An acute dermal toxicity study with rabbits, performed under GLP and according to a procedure comparable with OECD Guideline 402 is available (IIT Research Institute, 1991a). TAME was applied undiluted at a dose of 2000 mg/kg bw to the shaved backs of five male and five female New Zealand White rabbits. No deaths occurred during the study. The LD50 for TAME was estimated to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Based on the comparable physico-chemical properties of TAEE, ETBE and TAME, the low biological activity of the three substances after acute inhalation and oral exposure and the low biological activity of TAME and ETBE regarding acute dermal toxicity (LD50 values >2000 mg/kg bw), the acute dermal toxicity of TAEE is also considered to be low (i.e. the dermal LD50 value is assumed to be >2000 mg/kg bw).
Human data
Some human data are available for the structural analogues of TAEE (TAME (2-methoxy-2-methylbutane) and ETBE (2-ethoxy-2-methylpropane)) (see section 7.10.5 of the IUCLID).
TAME:
In a volunteer study with six humans (men) per group (Pekari et al, 1997b), TAME caused only minor acute effects (exposure concentrations: 15 ppm (60 mg/m3) and 50 ppm (212 mg/m3)). The reporting on the effects is somewhat inconsistent and not very firm conclusions can be drawn from the study. Feelings characterised as heaviness of the head seemed to correlate inversely with increasing TAME concentration. Concentrations up to 50 ppm did not have an effect on reaction time, balance or mood during/after 4-hour exposure. In conclusion, 50 ppm (212 mg/m3) is considered the NOAEC in this study.
ETBE:
Human data (eight human subjects) (Nihlen et al, 1998b) showed a small (3-4%) but significant (P<0.05) decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) and vital capacity (VC) in subjects exposed to 25 or 50 ppm ETBE vapour. The authors state that one-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and the transfer factor (TLco) were also decreased significantly (approx. 2% and 2-4%, respectively) after exposure, however data included in the publication was assigned non-significant P values. In conclusion, slightly decreased lung function was observed. The changes were mild in nature and minor in extent.They fall within the changes as part of the normal daily variation (circadian rhythm).
There was no statistically significant effect on eye redness, tear-film break-up, conjunctival damage or blinking frequency after exposure up to 50 ppm ETBE vapour for 2 hours. Subjective symptoms of ocular discomfort were greater in the 50 ppm group (compared to the 5 and 25 ppm group), but no dose-response relationship or statistically significant difference was present. The intensity of the response at 50 ppm appeared to be very mild (stated to be between "not at all" and "hardly at all").
Exposure to 50 ppm ETBE vapour for 2 hr was associated with subjective discomfort of the airways. Subjective symptoms of nasal discomfort were greater in the 50 ppm group, but no dose-response relationship or statistically significant difference was present. The intensity of the response at 50 ppm appeared to be very mild (stated to be between "not at all" and "hardly at all"). Symptoms had resolved 80 min after exposure ceased. The taste and odour of the test atmosphere was unpleasant and unacceptable to the subjects and suggest that subjective findings may be unreliable.Justification for classification or non-classification
In accordance to Directive 67/548/EEC and EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, classification is not necessary for acute oral, inhalation and dermal toxicity based on the available data.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.