Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(on Days 0 and 1 of the test, the light intensity exceeded the mean by more than 15% (max 19%). This deviation did not adversely impact the results of this study.)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
2009
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(on Days 0 and 1 of the test, the light intensity exceeded the mean by more than 15% (max 19%). This deviation did not adversely impact the results of this study.)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
At the start of the test, two samples (50 mL) were taken from freshly prepared uninoculated control and test media. After 72 hours, two samples (50 mL) of control and test media were taken from uninoculated replicate flasks. Samples were stored in a freezer prior to analysis.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
REPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: water accommodated fractions (WAF)
4.77 mg/5 litres, 15.3 mg/5 litres,9.77 mg/1 litre, 31.3 mg/1 litre and 100 mg/1 litre was dispersed in dilution medium (algal nutrient medium as recommended in the guidelines) in glass vessels. The contents of each vessel were stirred for approximately 24 hours and then left to stand for approximately 24 hours. Aliquots were then removed from the mid-vessel region to provide the Water Accommodated Fractions (WAF) at nominal loading rates of 0.954, 3.05, 9.77, 31.3 and 100 mg/L. The WAF at nominal loading rate 3.05 mg/L was diluted with OECD medium to provide a nominal test concentration of 0.298 mg/L.
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Three days. Algal cells used for inoculation were in the log phase of growth.
- Method of cultivation: Liquid slope cultures were stored in an illuminated refrigerator. Sterile algal nutrient medium was inoculated with cells aseptically removed from the slope culture; these primary liquid cultures were incubated for approximately three days in an orbital incubator under continuous illumination at nominal temperatures in the range 21 to 25°C. Subsequently, appropriate volumes of these primary cultures were aseptically transferred to fresh sterile algal nutrient medium to prepare secondary liquid cultures; these cultures were incubated, as stated above, for three days and used as inoculum for the test.

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 6 days (pre-culturing)
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
25 mg/L as CaCO3
Test temperature:
22.5-24 °C
pH:
test start (0 h): 7.5-7.7
test end (72 h): 7.9-9.6
Nominal and measured concentrations:
nominal loading rates: 0.298, 0.954, 3.05, 9.77, 31.3 and 100 mg/L as WAF
mean measured TOC levels (after background correction):
test start: 0.0415, 0.0235, after 72 hours: 0.658, 0.316, 0.403, 0.116, 0.410 and 0.202 mg C/L (control mean: 0.726 mg C/L)
arithmetric mean: 0.350, 0.170, not applicable, not applicable, 0.252, 0.173
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL conical flasks (autoclaved) containing 100 mL of inoculated test medium and loosly plugged with foam bungs
- Aeration/gaseous exchange: orbital incubator, oscillating at nominal 130 cycles per minute
- Initial cells density: 1x10⁴ cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 121 x10⁴ cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: filtered, dechlorinated tap water, softened and treated by reverse osmosis before microfiltration and purification (resistivity 18 Megohm/cm)
- Total organic carbon: 0.4 mg C/L
- Ca/Mg ratio: 1:1
- Culture medium different from test medium: no

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: nominally 5790 to 6112 lux provided by 6 x 30 W “cool white” 1 metre fluorescent tubes. Light intensity (four corner positions and in a central position of the random block design) within the test area were determined each day. To minimise the impact of differences in light intensity across the test area on algal growth, control and test flasks were re-positioned in the test area each day during the test.
On Days 0 and 1, the light intensity exceeded the mean by 16-19%. As the validity criteria were met, this deviation to guideline was not thought to have affected either the validity or integrity of the study.

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : cell densities measured at 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Determination of cell concentrations: electronic particle counter

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: nominal loading rates of 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: inhibition of algal growth after 72 hours was 100% and 74% at 100 and 10 mg/L, respectively.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
7 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits: 4.5-8 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits: 4-8 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Remarks on result:
other: 95% condidence limits: 4-8 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate, yield and biomass
Remarks on result:
other: results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits: 4-7 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
5 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits: 3-6 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
5 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limits: 3-6 mg/L; results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): no microscopic abnormalities
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: minor stimulation was observed (see Table 2). This had no influemce on calculation of EC50 values.

At the start of the test, the test media (as WAF) at all nominal loading rates were colourless.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 72-hour EbC50: 0.541 mg/L (typical range in this laboratory: 0.3 to 1 mg/L)
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Statistical analysis was perfomed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute 2002), using nominal loading rates. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the likelihood ratio method. Williams’ test was used to compare each treated group with control unless there was evidence of a non-monotonic dose-response relationship, in which case Dunnett’s test was used.

Table 1 Cell densities

Nominal loading rates

(mg/L)

Replicate

number

Cell densities (cells/mL)

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

Control

R1

63000

260067

1189500

R2

58600

243100

1231633

R3

54800

252167

1214800

R4

59167

279067

1168433

R5

56267

273833

1267533

R6

56567

265000

1177467

Mean

58067

262206

1208228

0.298

R1

54567

254033

1228367

R2

63700

272133

1192367

R3

60867

277933

1423267

Mean

59711

268033

1281333

0.954

R1

56667

256900

1182933

R2

65133

292100

1298233

R3

57433

291233

1369733

Mean

59744

280078

1283633

3.05

R1

58733

289833

1273633

R2

57133

281233

1252300

R3

60833

296367

1310433

Mean

58900

289144

1278789

9.77

R1

1633

7100

13700

R2

-5667

2000

7233

R3

-4333

5600

7567

Mean

-2789

4900

9500

31.3

R1

-2100

8367

10300

R2

-2333

8000

6733

R3

-4567

9233

7967

Mean

-3000

8533

8333

100

R1

-900

3800

6633

R2

-4433

7067

6900

R3

-2367

6567

6467

Mean

-2567

5811

6667

R1-R6: replicate number

Note: the initial cell density was estimated to be 0.875 x 104/mL

 

 

Table 2 Inhibition of growth

  

Parameter

Nominal loading

rates

(mg/L)

Sample size

Mean

Inhibition

(%)

p-value

Area under curve to

72 hours

Control

6

21.6

0

-

0.298

3

22.6

-4.9

>0.999

0.954

3

23

-6.4

>0.999

3.05

3

23.1

-7.0

>0.999

9.77

3

-0.4

102

<0.001***

31.3

3

-0.4

101.7

<0.001***

100

3

-0.4

102.0

<0.001***

Growth rate to

72 hours

Control

6

0.067

0.0

-

0.298

3

0.067

-1.2

>0.999

0.954

3

0.067

-1.2

>0.999

3.05

3

0.067

-1.2

>0.999

9.77

3

-0.001

102.0

<0.001***

31.3

3

-0.003

104.1

<0.001***

100

3

-0.006

108.5

<0.001***

Growth rate

0 to 24 hours°

Control

6

0.073

0.0

-

0.298

3

0.074

-1.5

>0.999

0.954

3

0.074

-1.6

>0.999

3.05

3

0.074

-0.8

>0.999

9.77

3

-0.076

203.1

<0.001***

Growth rate

24 to 48 hours

Control

6

0.063

0.0

-

0.298

3

0.063

0.3

>0.999

0.954

3

0.064

-2.5

0.553

3.05

3

0.066

-5.6

0.553

9.77

3

0.061

2.5

0.553

31.3

3

0.063

0.0

-

100

3

0.063

0.3

>0.999

Growth rate

48 to 72 hours

Control

6

0.064

0.0

-

0.298

3

0.065

-2.2

>0.999

0.954

3

0.063

0.4

>0.999

3.05

3

0.062

2.7

>0.999

9.77

3

0.031

51.1

<0.001***

31.3

3

-0.002

102.4

<0.001***

100

3

0.007

88.7

<0.001***

Yield

Control

6

1198228

0.0

-

0.298

3

1271334

-6.1

>0.999

0.954

3

1273633

-6.3

>0.999

3.05

3

1268789

-5.9

>0.999

9.77

3

-500

100.0

<0.001***

31.3

3

-1667

100.1

<0.001***

100

3

-3333

100.3

<0.001***

p values are for the comparison with Control using Williams' test

*** p < 0.001

° growth rate values at nominal loading rates of 31.3 and 100 mg/L between 0 to 24 hours could not be calculated as all cell counts at 24 hours were below the background measurements.

 

Control cultures:

-cell concentration increased by a factor of 121;

-the mean coefficient of variation for daily growth rates ranged between 2.8 and 4.6%;

- the coefficient of variation for the average specific growth rates was 0.64% during the 72 hour exposure period.

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
The criteria of OECD Guideline 201 and EU Method C.3 for biomass and growth rates were fulfilled.

Description of key information

effect values for average specific growth rates of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, 0-72 h, based on loading rates (OECD 201, EU C.3):
EL50: 7.4 mg/L, NOELR: 3.05 mg/L, EC10: 6.2 mg/L

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
7.4 mg/L
EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
3.1 mg/L

Additional information

The test results indicate that the test material is not inhibitory to growth of algae up to the limits of its water solubility and a NOEC and thus a PNEC cannot be determined.