Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
2.94 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
300
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
881.58 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

NOAEC(corr) = 1000 mg/kg bw/day * (1/0.38 m³/kg/day) * (50/100) * (6.7 m³/10 m³) = 881.58 mg/m³

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
default value
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
remaining uncertainties
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
default value for worker
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
3 mg/m³
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
other: OEL value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
33.33 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
30
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
remaining differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
worker
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
AF for remaining uncertainties:
0.1
Justification:
10 % dermal absorption is expected due to a molecular weight > 500 g/mol and a logPow >4 (factor = 0.1)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

1. Identification of relevant dose descriptor

In a 28 d study performed in rat (OECD guideline 407), the substance did not cause mortalities, signs of toxicity or any other changes or abnormalities. The NOEL is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/d.

2. Mode of action

No non-threshold mode of action is associated with the test substance. In particular, the test substance has no genotoxic potential.

3. Application of assessment factors

Allometric scaling: rat to human = 4

Interspecies factor (remaining differences): 2.5

Intraspecies factor: worker = 5, general population = 10

Exposure duration subacute to chronic: 6

Quality of data base: 1

Dose response: 1

10% dermal absorption due to a molecular weight > 500 g/mol and a log Pow > 4 (factor = 0.1)

4. Daily exposure

Worker: exposed for 8h

General population: exposed for 24h

Calculation of DNEL bases upon Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption, European Commission, 2004 and Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, may 2008

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.72 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
434.78 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

NOAEC(corr) = 1000 mg/kg bw/day * (1 / 1.15 m³/kg bw/day) * (50/100) = 434.78 mg/m³

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
default value
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
remaining uncertainties
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
consumer
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
default value
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
default value
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
16.67 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
60
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
general population
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
AF for remaining uncertainties:
0.1
Justification:
10 % dermal absorption is expected due to a molecular weight > 500 g/mol and a logPow >4 (factor = 0.1)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
1.67 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
AF for dose response relationship:
1
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
subacute to chronic
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
rat to human
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
general population
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

1. Identification of relevant dose descriptor

In a 28 d study performed in rat (OECD guideline 407), the substance did not cause mortalities, signs of toxicity or any other changes or abnormalities. The NOEL is considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/d.

2. Mode of action

No non-threshold mode of action is associated with the test substance. In particular, the test substance has no genotoxic potential.

3. Application of assessment factors

Allometric scaling: rat to human = 4

Interspecies factor (remaining differences): 2.5

Intraspecies factor: worker = 5, general population = 10

Exposure duration subacute to chronic: 6

Quality of data base: 1

Dose response: 1

10% dermal absorption due to a molecular weight > 500 g/mol and a log Pow > 4 (factor = 0.1)

4. Daily exposure

Worker: exposed for 8h

General population: exposed for 24h

Calculation of DNEL bases upon Guidance Document on Dermal Absorption, European Commission, 2004 and Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health, may 2008