Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Explosiveness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
explosiveness
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study was performed according to guidelines
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E1226 Standard Test Method for Pressure and Rate of Pressure Rise for Combustible Dusts and International Standards Organization (ISO) Method 6184/1.
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E2019, Standard Test Method for Minimum Ignition Energy of a Dust Cloud in Air; TheBritish Standard 5958, 1991;and European Standard: IEC 1241-2-3: 1994
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: British Standard 5958, 1991 and European Standard: IEC 1241-2-3: 1994
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ASTM E1491 and as described by the U.S. Bureau of Mines in ROI 5624 and by the Institute of Chemical Engineers (UK) in their publication, "Guide to Dust Explosion Prevention and Protection - Part 2" (1988) and the European Standard 1241-2-1: 1994.
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
not specified
Parameter:
other: More sensitive to shock than m-dinitrobenzene
Remarks:
migrated information
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Parameter:
other: More sensitive to friction than m-dinitrobenzene
Remarks:
migrated information
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Parameter:
other: Explosive under influence of flame
Remarks:
migrated information
Remarks on result:
positive (not further specified)
Remarks:
Type A (Explosible)

Test

Result

Explosibility Screening- A/B Classification

Group A (Explosible)

 

 

Explosion Severity-201 Sphere Apparatus:

 

       Max. Explosion Pressure (bar)

6.5

       Max. Rate of Pressure Rise (bar/s)

499

       Kst Value (bar.m/s)

135

 

 

Minimum Ignition energy (mJ)

10-25

Minimum Ignition temperature – Dust cloud (0C)

> 800

Minimum Ignition Temperature – Dust Layer (0C)

> 400

 

 

Limiting Oxygen Concentration (% volume)

11 - 12

 

 

Volume Resistivity (ohm.m)

Ambient R.H.

4.4 x1010

 

Low R.H.

4.9 x1011

 

 

 

Charge Decay time (min:sec)

Ambient R.H.

00:09

 

Low R.H.

00:56

 

 

 

Chargeability (C/kg)

 Ambient R.H.

 

 

Stainless Steel Tube

+4.3 x10-7

 

             Plastic Tube

+1.3 x10-5

 

              Glass Tube

+2.0 x10-6

 

Low R.H.

 

 

Stainless Steel Tube

+2.5 x10-6

 

              Plastic Tube

+1.3 x10-5

 

               Glass Tube

+2.0 x10-6

Conclusions:
The test substance was determined to be Type A (Explosible). The test substance will explode if exposed to an ignition source when in the form of a dust cloud.
Executive summary:

A screening test was performed according to guidelines given in ASTM E2019, British Standard 5958 and European Standard: IEC 1241 -2 -3. The test allows the test substance to be classified as Type A explosible or Type B non-explosible.

The test substance was determined to be Type A (Explosible) indicating that the test substance, when in the form of a dust cloud, will explode if exposed to an ignition source.

Endpoint:
explosiveness, other
Remarks:
assessment of chemical groups that imply explosive properties
Type of information:
other: expert statement
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
08 November 2014 to 27 November 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.14 (Explosive properties)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Key result
Parameter:
other: assessment of chemical structure
Remarks on result:
other: explosive properties predicted negative as no structural alerts were identified in the test item

RESULTS

- No structural alerts for explosive properties were identified within the chemical structure of the test item.

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The result for explosive properties was predicted negative based on the chemical structure of the test item.
Executive summary:

GUIDELINE

The prediction was undertaken using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.14 Explosive Properties of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 (30 May 2008).

RESULTS

No structural alerts associated with explosive properties were identified within the chemical structure of the test item.

 

CONCLUSION

The result for explosive properties was predicted negative based on the chemical structure of the test item.

Endpoint:
explosive properties of explosives
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 November 2016 to 17 November 2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.14 (Explosive properties)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 830.6316 (Explodability)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Key result
Parameter:
sensitiveness to friction: friction load (N)
Value:
0
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
negative (not further specified)
Key result
Parameter:
sensitiveness to impact: impact energy (J)
Value:
0
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
negative (not further specified)
Key result
Parameter:
thermal sensitivity - Koenen test: diameter of the orifice plate
Remarks:
6 mm orifice plate
Value:
0
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
negative (not further specified)
Key result
Parameter:
thermal sensitivity - Koenen test: diameter of the orifice plate
Remarks:
2 mm orifice plate
Value:
0
Number of fragments:
0
Remarks on result:
negative (not further specified)

TABLE 1 – BAM FRICTION TEST

Test

Observations

1

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

2

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

3

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

4

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

5

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

6

No signs of any sparks or ignition. A red mark on the porcelain plate and peg indicated decomposition.

Result: Negative

 

TABLE 2 – BAM FALL HAMMER TEST

Test

Observations

1

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

2

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

3

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

4

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

5

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

6

No signs of explosion. When the test assembly was dismantled there were no signs of decomposition.

Result: Negative

 

TABLE 3 – KOENEN STEEL TUBE TEST (6mm ORIFICE PLATE)

Test

Time(s)

Observations

1

87

A yellow flame from the orifice.

1

96

Test item was ejected from the orifice.

1

283

The yellow flame extinguished.

1

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

2

86

A yellow flame and test item emitted from the orifice.

2

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

3

87

A yellow flame and test item emitted from the orifice.

3

272

The yellow flame self-extinguished.

3

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

 

TABLE 4 – KOENEN STEEL TUBE TEST (2mm ORIFICE PLATE)

Test

Time(s)

Observations

1

88

A yellow flame from the orifice.

1

113

Test item was ejected from the orifice.

1

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

2

86

A yellow flame from the orifice.

2

96

Test item was ejected from the orifice.

2

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

3

103

A yellow flame from the orifice.

3

117

Test item was ejected from the orifice.

3

300

The test was stopped. The tube was recovered intact.

Result: Negative

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was determined not to have explosive properties.
Executive summary:

GUIDELINE

The determination was carried out using BAM friction, BAM fall hammer and Koenen steel tube apparatus in a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.14 Explosive properties of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 830.6316 of the OCSPP guidelines.

RESULTS

The results of the BAM friction test, BAM fall hammer test and Koenen steel tube test were all negative.

CONCLUSION      

The test item was determined not to have explosive properties.

Description of key information

The result for explosive properties was predicted negative based on the chemical structure of the test item and this prediction was confirmed experimentally (EU Method A.14).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Explosiveness:
non explosive

Additional information

Screening test

A screening test was performed according to guidelines given in ASTM E2019, British Standard 5958 and European Standard: IEC 1241 -2 -3. The test allows the test substance to be classified as Type A explosible or Type B non-explosible. The test substance was determined to be Type A (Explosible) indicating that the test substance, when in the form of a dust cloud, will explode if exposed to an ignition source.

Prediction of explosive properties

GUIDELINE

The prediction was undertaken using a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.14 Explosive Properties of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 (30 May 2008).

RESULTS

No structural alerts associated with explosive properties were identified within the chemical structure of the test item.

CONCLUSION

The result for explosive properties was predicted negative based on the chemical structure of the test item.

Determination of explosive properties

GUIDELINE

The determination was carried out using BAM friction, BAM fall hammer and Koenen steel tube apparatus in a procedure designed to be compatible with Method A.14 Explosive properties of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and Method 830.6316 of the OCSPP guidelines.

RESULTS

The results of the BAM friction test, BAM fall hammer test and Koenen steel tube test were all negative.

CONCLUSION      

The test item was determined not to have explosive properties.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The result for explosive properties was predicted negative based on the chemical structure of the test item and the prediction was confirmed in an experimental investigation (EU Method A.14). Classification in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 is therefore unnecessary.