Alkanes, C8-9-iso-

Endpoint summary

Description of key information

Short description of key information on bioaccumulation potential result: 
See toxicokinetic, metabolism and distriubtion.
Short description of key information on absorption rate: 
Under dermal in vitro test conditions, n-heptane was able to penetrate the skin. During prolonged exposure, the penetration of the skin was aggravated, since the exposure to n-heptane simultaneously reduced skin barrier function. Similar properties are expected for hydrocarbons, C8-C9, isoalkanes.
Due to the experimental setup, e. g. undepletable reservoir of test substance and therefore absence of any evaporation, the dermal penetration factors reported by Fasano and McDougal (2008) are very conservative. In contrast, when using a diffusion cell, which is a more realistic setup for volatile subsances like hydrocarbon solvents, dermal penetration rates of 0.1 µg/cm2/h and 0.0005 µg/cm2/h were obtained for heptane and octane, respectively (Tsuruta, 1982).

Additional information

There are no toxicokinetic data available on hydrocarbons, C7-C9, iso-alkanes. However, there are reliable data available for other category members. Thus, read-across was conducted based on a category-approach.

 

The inhaled uptake of n-heptane vapors was explored by Dahl et al. (1988) in male rats exposed for 5 consecutive days, 80 min/day with escalation of vapor concentration daily (from 1 ppm up to 5000 ppm). During the exposures, respiratory and gas chromatographic data were collected at 1 min intervals. For n-heptane, only data from one exposure at 100 ppm were available. Uptake of inhaled n-heptane vapor was 4.5 ± 0.3 nmol/kg/min/ppm (n = 10). The value is given for uptake during minutes 60 to 70 from the start of exposure of the experiment. Taking into account all data of the report, a number of trends relating uptake to chemicals properties were observed. Among these, highly volatile hydrocarbons are less well-absorbed than less volatile hydrocarbons; unsaturated compounds are better absorbed than saturated ones; and branched hydrocarbons are less well-absorbed than unbranched ones. These trends can be used to predict relative uptake rates within classes of hydrocarbons.

 

In a subsequent study, differences in biological fate of inhaled nephrotoxic iso-octane and non-nephrotoxic n-octane were explored by Dahl (1989) in rats exposed to 14C-labeled vapor by nose-only inhalation at concentrations of 0, 1.0, and 350 ppm for a single 2 hour exposure. Thenephrotoxicityof iso-octane is due to male rat specific alpha 2u-globulin nephropathy and is not relevant to humans as they do not have this protein. Radioactivity of exhalant, urine, and feces was measured for 70 hours post-exposure after which residual radioactivity in the carcasses was determined. Inhaled uptake of n-octane was greater than iso-octane uptake at both concentrations. The uptake rate at the low concentration for n-octane was twice that of the high concentration (6.1 and 3.4 nmol/kg/min/ppm, respectively).

 

The major route of elimination of 14C was carbon dioxide. For n-octane absorbed at low concentration, the amount of inhaled 14C in the carcass at 70 hours post-exposure was nearly 5% of total inhaled, a significantly higher level than that remaining after high concentration exposure (approx. 2%). The fraction of inhaled n-octane exhaled unchanged was 4.5 and 6.5% of high and low exposure levels, respectively. Half of n-octane 14C retained at the end of the 2 hour exposure was eliminated within 5-10 hours post-exposure and stopped after 30 hours when 75-85% of activity was eliminated. The rate of excretion of n-octane was markedly affected by the concentration of inhaled vapor. The ratio of 14CO2 to 14C in urine was 5:1 after inhalation at the low concentration but 1:1 after inhalation at the high concentration.

 

The excretion pattern of n-octane, fairly evenly distributed between 14CO2 and kidney by 15 hours, and the rapid elimination differed from that of iso-octane for which excretion was primarily through the kidney at a slower rate.

 

Toxicokinetic properties of n-heptane were investigated in rats during inhalation of 100 ppm of the hydrocarbon for 3 days, 12 hours/day (Zahlsen et al., 1992). The concentration of n-heptane was measured by head space gas chromatography in blood, brain, liver, kidneys and perirenal fat. n-Heptane was found in moderate concentrations in the kidneys and only in marginal concentrations in blood, brain and liver. In perirenal fat, concentrations were the highest, however, decreasing with lasting exposure. This is in contrast to other n-alkanes, which showed increasing concentrations.

 

Partition coefficients of n-heptane were determined in human blood and tissues by Perbellini et al. (1985). The solubility of n-heptane was tested in blood, saline, olive oil and in the most important human tissues (lung, kidney, liver, brain, muscle, heart, and fat). The solubility of n-heptane in saline was low and very high in olive oil, displaying a partition coefficient of 452 (20.0 SD). The partition coefficients were therefore high in fat and fatty tissues compared to the other examined tissues.

 

Based on read-across from structurally related compounds within a category approach, C8-C9alkanes are readily absorbed and distributed through the body. n-Alkanes are readily metabolized and excreted in urine and expired as CO2. iso-Alkanes are less readily metabolized to a range of metabolites that are excreted in the urine. Tissue/blood ratios are greater than unity, especially for iso-alkanes, but on prolonged administration, metabolizing enzymes appear to be induced and ratios decrease. For n-alkanes, there appears to be a very low rate of metabolism to potentially neurotoxic gamma diketones, and no such metabolism for the iso-alkanes.

 

Discussion on bioaccumulation potential result:

See toxicokinetic, metabolism and distriubtion.

Discussion on absorption rate:

There are no dermal absorption data available onhydrocarbons, C8-C9, isoalkanes. However, there are reliable data available for another category member. Thus, read-across was conducted based on a category-approach.

 

Fasano and McDougal (2008) described the procedures for determination of a permeability coefficient (Kp) and two short-term dermal absorption rates at 10 and 60 min. The flux values for n-heptane and the 10 and 60 min short-term absorption values (the quantity of chemical remaining in the skin plus that portion that had penetrated the skin was detected in the receptor fluid) were 63.2 µg/cm2/h, 113 µg/cm2/h (for the 10 min flux) and 22.1 µg/cm2/h (for the 60 min flux). Therefore, the 10 min flux value for n-heptane (based on both the amount in the skin and the receptor solution) was greater than the flux measured in a similar manner over 60 min.

 

Skin integrity measurements were taken before and after each experiment. A ratio of post- to pre-test impedance of "1" indicates that the skin barrier did not change over the course of the experiment. In the Kp experiments, skin exposed to n-heptane had a damage ratio of 0.57, confirming that approx. 43% of the skin barrier function was lost due to exposure to n-heptane. The barrier properties for the skin in the short-term experiments were given as the ratios of 0.90 for 10 min and 0.88 for 60 min. At the end of the Kp experiment, the portion of n-heptane in the skin (0.01%) was less than the portion in the receptor solution (0.12%). The portion of n-heptane in the donor solution (wash) was 95.4%. In contrast to the Kp experiment, the skin (0.14%) retained a larger percentage of n-heptane following a 10 min exposure. The portion of n-heptane in the donor solution (wash) was 6.84% at 10 min. The greater portion of the applied dose remaining in the skin at 10 min suggests that partitioning into the skin from the donor solution is the driver of penetration with this brief exposure. After the 60 min experiments, there was also a larger percentage of n-heptane in the receptor solution (0.12%) than in the skin (0.06%). The increased proportion of n-heptane detected in the receptor solution illustrates and confirms the movement of the chemical from the skin into the receptor solution. Under the test conditions, n-heptane was able to penetrate the skin. During prolonged exposure, the penetration of the skin was aggravated, since the exposure to n-heptane simultaneously reduced skin barrier function.

OVERVIEW OF PERCUTANEOUS ABSORPTION OF HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS

There are no studies of repeated dose toxicity of hydrocarbon solvents using the dermal route of administration. Accordingly, where it is necessary to calculate dermal DNELs, systemic data from studies utilizing other routes of administration, normally inhalation but also oral data, can be used in some situations.  In accordance with ECHA guidance, read across from oral or inhalation data to dermal should account for differences in absorption where these exist (R8, example B.6). In fact, hydrocarbon solvents are poorly absorbed in most situations, in part because some are volatile and do not remain in contact with the skin for long periods of time and also because, due to their hydrophobic natures, do not partition well into aqueous environments and are poorly absorbed into the blood. 

 

           If these differences in relative absorption are introduced into the DNEL calculations to calculate external doses, the DNELs based on systemic effects are highly inflated. This seems potentially misleading as it implies that substances have different intrinsic hazards when encountered by different routes whereas in fact the differences are due ultimately to differences in absorbed dose. Accordingly, it is our opinion that it would be more transparent if the differences in absorption were taken into account in the exposure equations rather than in DNEL derivation. 

 

           Shown below is a compilation of percutaneous absorption information for a number of hydrocarbon solvent constituents covering carbon numbers ranging from C5 to C14 as well as examples of both aliphatic and aromatic constituents. The low molecular weight aliphatic hydrocarbons (n-pentane, 2-methylpentane, n-hexane, n-heptane, and n-octane) were tested by Tsuruta (1982) using rat skin in an in vitro model system. As shown (Table 1), the highest percutaneous absorption value was 2 ug/cm2/hr for pentane. Lower values (< ~ 1 ug/cm2/hr) were reported for aliphatic hydrocarbons ranging from hexane to octane. Several authors have assessed the percutaneous absorption of higher molecular weight aliphatic constituents including Baynes et al. (2000), Singh and Singh (2003), Muhammad et al. (2005), and Kim et al., (2006). The first three of these authors used porcine skin models and reported that, except for one anomalous result with tridecane, the percutaneous absorption values for aliphatic constituents ranging from nonane to tetradecane were well below 1 ug/cm2/hr. Rat and human skin are considered to be more permeable than human skin (Kim et al., 2006), so these numbers can be considered conservative. 

 

           Kim et al. (2006) reported results of percutaneous absorption studies with human skin under in vivo conditions. In this case, the assessment method was based on tape stripping. The authors reported percutaneous absorption values ranging from 1 – 2 ug/kg/day for decane, undecane and dodecane. These values are higher than those reported by other authors, most likely because this technique measures absorption into the skin but not through the skin as was done in the studies listed above. Accordingly, it seems likely that these numbers are conservative as well.

 

           With respect to aromatic hydrocarbons, most of the reported percutaneous absorption values [Baynes et al. (2000); Singh and Singh (2003); Mohammad et al. (2005); and Kim et al. (2006)] are less than 2 ug/cm2/day. The only exceptions are the values for naphthalene from Mohammad et al. (2005) which range from 4.2-6.6 ug/cm2/hr. 

 

           After considering all of the above, it seems reasonable to assume apparent that across the entire range of hydrocarbon solvent constituents, percutaneous absorption values are less than 2 ug/cm2/day. Accordingly, when systemic dermal DNELs are calculated using route to route extrapolations, the values will not be corrected for differences in absorption. Rather, 2 ug/cm2/hr will be used as a common percutaneous absorption rate for all hydrocarbon solvents for which dermal exposure estimates are provided. 

           

Table 1: Summarized information on percutaneous absorption of hydrocarbon solvent constituents (C5-C16). 

 

Constituent	Molecular Weight	nmol/min/cm2	nmol/hr/cm2	ug/cm2/hr	Reference
Aliphatic Constituents
Pentane	72	0.52	31.2	2.2	Tsuruta et al. 1982
2-methyl pentane	86	0.02	1.2	0.1	Tsuruta et al., 1982
n-hexane	86	0.02	0.6	0.5	Tsuruta et al., 1982
n-heptane	100	0.02	1.2	0.1	Tsuruta et al., 1982
n-octane	114	0.08 x 10-3	0.005	0.0005	Tsuruta et al., 1982
Nonane	128			0.03	Muhammad et al., 2005
Nonane				0.38	McDougal et al., 1999
Decane	142			2	Kim et al., 2006
Decane				1.65	McDougal et al., 1999
Undecane	156			0.06-0.07	Muhammad et al., 2005
Undecane				1.0	Kim et al., 2006
Undecane				1.22	McDougal et al., 1999
Dodecane	170			0.02-0.04	Muhammad et al., 2005
Dodecane				2	Kim et al., 2006
Dodecane				0.3	Singh and Singh, 2003
Dodecane				0.51	McDougal et al., 1999
Dodecane				0.1	Baynes et al. 2000
Tridecane	184			0.00-0.02	Muhammad et al., 2005
Tridecane				2.5	Singh and Singh, 2003
Tridecane				0.33	McDougal et al., 1999
Tetradecane	198			0.3	Singh and Singh, 2003
Hexadecane			7.02 x 10E-3	0.00004	Singh and Singh, 2002
Aromatic Constituents
Trimethyl benzene	120			0.49 - 1.01	Muhammad et al., 2005
Trimethyl benzene				1.25	McDougal et al., 1999
Naphthalene	128			6.6 - 4.2	Muhammad et al., 2005
Naphthalene				0.5	Kim et al., 2006
Naphthalene				1.4	Singh and Singh 2002
Naphthalene				1.8	Baynes et al. (2000)
Naphthalene				1.0	McDougal et al., 1999
1 methyl naphthalene	142			0.5	Kim et al., 2006
Methyl naphthalene				1.55	McDougal et al., 1999
2-methyl naphthalene				0.5	Kim et al., 2006
2-methyl naphthalene				1.1	Singh and Singh, 2002
Dimethyl naphthalene	156			0.62 – 0.67	Muhammad et al., 2005
Dimethyl naphthalene				0.59	McDougal et al. 1999

 

 

 

Table 2. Estimated percentages of various hydrocarbon solvent constituents absorbed

 

Based on the information provided below, an overall estimate of 1% for all hydrocarbon solvents seems reasonable. 

 

 

Category	Representative Substance	Estimate of Percent absorption	Proposal for category	Reference for percent value
1	Trimethyl benzene	0.2%	0.2%	Based on data in Muhammad et al. (2005)
2	Naphthalene	1.2%	1.2%	Riviere et al. 1999
3	Dodecane (75%)	0.63%	0.5%	Riviere et al., 1999
	TMB (25%)	0.2%		Muhammad et al., 2005
4	Hexadecane (70%)	0.18%	0.5%	Riviere et al., 1999
	Naphthalene (30%)	1.2%		Riviere et al., 1999
5	Pentane
6	Hexane
7	Heptane	0.14%	0.14%	Singh et al. 2003
8	Dodecane	0.63%	0.63%	Riviere et al. 1999
9	Hexadecane	0.18%	0.18%	Riviere et al., 1999

 

Kim, D., Andersen, M., and Nylander-French (2006). Dermal absorption and penetration of jet fuel components in humans. Toxicology Letters 165:11-21.

 

Muhammad, F., N. Monteiro-Riviere, R. Baynes, and J. Riviere (2005). Effect of in vivo jet fuel exposure on subsequent in vitro dermal absorption of individual aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon fuel constituents. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A. 68:719-737.

 

Singh Somnath, Zhao Kaidi, Singh Jagdish. (2002). In vitro permeability and binding of hydrocarbons in pig ear and human abdominal skin. Drug and chemical toxicology, (2002 Feb) Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 83-92.

 

Singh, S. and Singh, J. (2003). Percutaneous absorption, biophysical and macroscopic barrier properties of porcine skin exposed to major components of JP-8 jet fuel. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 14:77-85.

 

 

Singh, S., Zhao, K., Singh, J. (2003). In vivo percutaneous absorption, skin barrier perturbation and irritation from JP-8 jet fuel components. Drug Chem. Toxicol 26:135-146.

 

McDougal, J., Pollard, D., Weisman, W., Garrett, C., and Miller, T. (2000). Assessment of skin absorption and penetration of JP-8 jet fuel and its components. Toxicological Sciences 25:247-255.

 

Muhammad, F., N. Monteiro-Riviere, R. Baynes, and J. Riviere (2005). Effect of in vivo jet fuel exposure on subsequent in vitro dermal absorption of individual aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbon fuel constituents. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part A. 68:719-737.

 

Riviere, J., Brooks, J., Monteiro-Riviere, N., Budsaba, K., and Smith, C. (1999). Dermal absorption and distribution of topically dosed jet fuels jet A, JP-8 andJP-8(100). Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 160:60-75.

 

Tsuruta, H. et al. (1982). Percutaneous absorption of organic solvents III. On the penetration rates of hydrophobic solvents through the excised rat skin. Industrial Health 20:335-345.