Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-455-3 | CAS number: 1469983-49-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 24 october 2012 to 28 february 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling method:
For determination of the test item concentrations, duplicate samples were taken from all test concentrations and from the control at one treatment period of the first, second and last week of the test (day 0, 7 and 16, respectively).
To determine the maintenance of the test item concentrations in the test media, stability samples were taken at the end of the two test medium renewal periods of 48 hours (days 2 and 9) and at the end of the one renewal period of 72 hours (day 19).
The samples from the highest nominal concentration of 10 mg/L were only taken on days 0 and 2 as all daphnids were dead at observation on day 2 at this concentration level.
The following stability samples were taken in duplicate :
- samples taken from the actual test by conbining the contents of all replicate test beakers after the end of the test medium renewal period
- samples incubated during the renewal periods under test conditions, however without food and daphnids.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis:
All the samples were stored deep-frozen (at about -20°C) immediiately after sampling. Based on pre-experiments for investigation of the storage stability, the test item was considered to be sufficiently stable in the test water under these storage conditions.
The concentrations of the test item were measured in one of the duplicate test media samples from the two higher nominal concentrations of 3.2 and 10 mg/L, determined in the experiment as the 21-day NOEC and LOEC. From the control samples, one of the duplicate samples of each sampling date was analyzed. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: prior to the start of the test and prior to each test medium renewal, a stock solution of nominal 100 mg/L was freshly prepared by completely dissolving 50 mg of the test item (dosed in the range of 50.0 to 50.7 mg) in 500 mL of test water using stirring for 15 minutes at room temperature. Then, this intensively stirred solution was used in a series of dilution to prepare the test media of all test item concentrations.
- Controls: Yes, reconstituted water (test water)
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): No remarkable observations were made concerning theappearance of the test media. All test media were clear solutions throughout the test medium renewal periods. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Daphnia magna
- Strain/clone : Daphnia magna Straus Clone 5
- Source: supplied by the University of Sheffield/UK in 1992. Since this date, the clone is successfully bred at Harlan Laboratories in culture medium identical to the medium used for the test.
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): the daphnids used for the test originated from parental daphnids that were at least 14 days old but not older than four weeks and were not first brood progeny. At the start of the test, the test animals wer less than 24 hours old.
- Feeding during test : yes
- Food type: food mixture containing a suspension of green algae of the species Scenedesmus subspicatus (freshly grown at Harlan laboratories) and a fish food suspension (commercial fish diet Tetra Mi ®Hauptfutter).
- Amount: The food amount (based on the measured concentrations of the total Organic carbon) (TOC) in the food suspensions) was 0.20 mg TOC per Daphnia and day.
- Frequency: daily - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- water hardness : 2.5 mmol/L (=250 mg/L as CaCO3)
- Test temperature:
- During the test period, the water temperature was between 20 and 21°C.
- pH:
- During the test period, the pH of the test media and control ranged from 7.5 to 7.9.
See table 1 - Dissolved oxygen:
- During the test period, the dissolved oxygen concentrations were at least 7.7 mg/L.
See table 2 - Salinity:
- No data
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- The nominal concentrations tested were 0.10, 0.32, 1.0, 3.2 and 10 mg/L (cooresponding to 0.036, 0.116, 0.36, 1.16 and 3.6 mg active ingredient/L). Additionally, a control was tested in parallel.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Glass-beaker
- Type : covered with glass plates
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL glass-beaker containing 80 mL test medium
- Aeration: Test water was aerated until oxygen saturation before the test, but not aerated during the test
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency): Days 2, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 16 and 19 of the exposure period (every monday, wednesday and friday). At these dates, the surviving test animals were carefully transferred by means of glass tubes from the old test vessels into the freshly prepared test medium.
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): Single
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): Single
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Reconstituted water (Elendt M7 medium). Before use, the test water was aerated until oxygen saturation. during the test, the test media were not aerated. The test water was prepared by dissolving analytical grade salts and additives (according to the OECD guidelines 211) in purified water.
- Alkalinity: 0.9 mmol/L
-Water hardness : 2.5 mmol/L (= 250 mg/L as CaCO3)
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: A 16-h light to 8-h darkness photoperiod with a 30 minute transition period between light and darkness
- Light intensity: Approx. 400-540 Lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- The test replicates were observed for immobility of adults on days 0 -2 and thereafter three times per week before renewal of the test media . On the same dates, the test replicates were observed for the number of living and dead offspring and for the presence of aborded eggs.
- The time weighted means were calculated using the formula mentioned in the OECD guideline 211.
- The reproduction rate was calculated as the total number of living offspring produced per parent female surviving until the end of the test.
- The mean reproduction rates of the daphnids at the test concentrations were compared to the control by Dunnett t-test (Dunnett, 1995; Dunnett, 1964).
- no EC values for the inhibition of th reproduction rate could be calculated since no effect was determined on the reproduction of the daphnids up and including the nominal test concentration of 3.2 mg/L.
CONTROL PERFORMED: Yes
RANGE-FINDING STUDY : no - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2.9 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.39 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- other: solid content
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.05 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 2.9 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.39 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- other: solid content
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.05 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Details on results:
- At the concentrations of 0.10, 0.32, 1.0 and 3.2 mg/L, the survival was 100, 90, 100 and 80%, respectively (see table 3). At the highest test concentration of 10 mg/L , all test animals were dead at observation on day 5. Mortality up to 20% is regarded as natural and tolerated by the test guideline. Thus, the survival of daphnia magna after 21 days was reduced at the test concentration of nominal 10 mg/L (10.6 mg/L, 3.8 mg active ingredient/L, both mean measured).
The first young offspring released from their parent animals were recorded in the control and at the test concentrations of 0.10 to 3.2 mg/L with surviving parent animals at observation on day 9 (see table 4). At the highest concentration tested (nominal 10 mg/L), no offspring were produced.Thus the time of the first brood was not affected by the test item up and including the test concentration of nominal 3.2 mg/L (2.9 mg/L, 1.05 mg active ingredient/L, both mean measured).
The mean reproduction rate of the daphnids in the control was 127 +/- 13 living offspring per adult (mean +/- standard deviation, see table 5). No significant inhibitory effect of the test item on the mean reproduction rate was determined up to and including the highest test concentration of nominal 3.2 mg/L (Dunnett t-test, one-sided smaller, α = 0.05).
With the exception of the reported mortality and reduced reproduction rates, no visible abnormalities were observed at the test animals during the test. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 21-day NOEC (survival and reproduction) was found to be 2.9 mg/L (corresponding to 1.39 mg solid content/L and 1.05 mg active content/L) based on measured concentrations. The 21-day ECx values for the inhibition of the reproduction rate could not be calculated since no effect was determined on the reproduction of the daphnids up and including the mean measured test concentration of 2.9 mg/L (corresponding to 1.39 mg solid content/L and 1.05 mg active content/L).
- Executive summary:
The chronic toxicity of the test item (= substance EC 939-455-3 in aqueous commercial product) to the freshwater crustacean species Daphnia magna was investigated in a GLP-compliant study performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 211 and EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test). The 21-day NOEC (survival and reproduction) of the test item was found to be 2.9 mg/L (corresponding to 1.39 mg solid content/L and 1.05 mg active content/L) based on measured concentrations.
Reference
1- VALIDATION OF THE ANALYTICAL METHOD
- Specificity
The biological control samples and an analyzed analytical blank (test media) did not affect the chromatogram at the retention time of the test item. The calibration solutions contained a peak specific for the test item, whose area changed accordingly with known concentration.
-Linearity
- An example of calibration data for the calibration solutions of the test item is given in figure 1 (calibration plot) and in the following table :
Nominal concentration of test item
(mg/L) |
Signal
(counts) |
Fitted concentration of test item
(mg/L) |
Deviation of the fitted value from the nominal value
(%) |
1.04 |
54353 |
1.01 |
-2.8 |
2.06 |
201412 |
2.02 |
-1.9 |
3.06 |
469701 |
3.16 |
3.2 |
5.00 |
1257400 |
5.31 |
6.2 |
9.54 |
3694335 |
9.39 |
-1.7 |
12.1 |
6168676 |
12.3 |
1.9 |
15.3 |
8485034 |
14.6 |
-4.5 |
The R2 fit of the calibration curves used were 0.9985, 0.9979 and 0.9985. This reflects the linearity of the analytical system within the calibration range of 1.04-15.3mg test item/L.
- Accuracy (recovery) and precision
Concurrent with the sample analyzis, a set of recovery samples accurately forftified at relevant concentrations of the test item (1.93 mg and 14.1 mg test item/L) was prepared five-fold and analyzed. The results obtained for the concentrations of the test item in the recovery samples are presented in the following table :
Nominal concentration of test item
cfort (mg/L) |
Measured concentration of test item in the Spiked sample x (mg/L) |
Sample preparation factor
F |
Concentration of test item determined in the spiked sample c (mg/L) |
Recovery rate
R (%) |
Accuracy (Average Recovery)
(%) |
Precision (Relative standard deviation of recovery) (%) |
0 |
* |
1.0 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
n.a. |
- |
1.93 |
2.00 |
1.0 |
2.00 |
104 |
105 |
5 |
1.93 |
1.97 |
1.0 |
1.97 |
102 |
||
1.93 |
2.15 |
1.0 |
2.15 |
112 |
||
1.93 |
2.06 |
1.0 |
2.06 |
107 |
||
1.93 |
1.91 |
1.0 |
1.91 |
99 |
||
14.1 |
14.9 |
1.0 |
14.9 |
105 |
110 |
4 |
14.1 |
15.2 |
1.0 |
15.2 |
107 |
||
14.1 |
15.3 |
1.0 |
15.3 |
108 |
||
14.1 |
15.9 |
1.0 |
15.9 |
112 |
||
14.1 |
16.2 |
1.0 |
16.2 |
115 |
||
Acceptance Target : |
80-120 |
< 10 |
* the measured concentration was below the lowest calibration concentration
LOQ = 0.972 mg/L n.a. : not applicable
The tabulated values of the samples represent rounded results obtained by calculation using the exact raw data
The average recoveries were found to be 105% and 110% of the spiked values with relative standard deviations of 5% and 4%, respectively. The method was considered to be sufficiently accurate and precise for the purposes of this test. The test sample results were not corrected for recovery.
- Limit of quantification
The limit of quantification (LOQ) for the test item in the test samples was derived from the lowest calibration solution, which fits into the calibration curve. The LOQ is 1.04mg test item/L.
2- ANALYTICAL RESULTS
The results obtained for the concentrations of the test samples are presented in the following table :
Timepoint
(day/h) |
Nominal concentration of test item Cnom (mg/L) |
Measured concentration of test item X (mg/L) |
Sample preparation factor F |
Determined concentration of test item c (mg/L) |
% of nominal concentration
(%) |
0/0 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
3.51 |
1 |
3.51 |
110 |
|
10 |
10.8 |
1 |
10.8 |
108 |
|
2/48 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
2.88 |
1 |
2.88 |
90 |
|
10 |
10.4 |
1 |
10.4 |
104 |
|
2/48* |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
1.81 |
1 |
1.81 |
57 |
|
10 |
5.21 |
1 |
5.21 |
52 |
|
7/0 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
3.50 |
1 |
3.50 |
110 |
|
9/48 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
3.44 |
1 |
3.44 |
108 |
|
9/48* |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
1.04 |
1 |
1.04 |
33 |
|
16/0 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
3.53 |
1 |
3.53 |
110 |
|
19/72 |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
1.39 |
1 |
1.39 |
43 |
|
19/72* |
Control |
** |
1 |
< LOQ |
n.a. |
3.2 |
1.06 |
1 |
1.06 |
33 |
* with feed ** the measured concentration was below the lowest calibration concentration LOQ = 0.972 mg/L n.a. : not applicable
The tabulated values of the samples represent rounded results obtained by calculation using the exact raw data
The concentrations as % nominal found in the fresh test samples were 110% and 108% (day 0), 110% (day 7) and 110% (day 16).
The concentrations as % nominal found in the old test samples were 90% and 104% (day 2/48h), 57% and 52% (day 2/48h, with feed), 108% (day 9/48h), 33% (day 9/48h, with feed), 43% (day 19/72h) and 33% (day 19/71h, with feed).
Remark : in the stability control samples including food particles the mean test item concentrations had further decreased to 33 -57% of the nominal values. Thus , a part of the test item had obviously adsorbed onto the food particles. However, since filter feeding test animals as Daphnia may take up the test item also from ingested food, the decrease of the test item concentrations in the test media due to adsorption onto food is not taken into account. Therefore, the biological results are based on mean measured test item concentrations (calculated as the time-weighted means over all measurements per test concentration without food (3.2 mg/L, three intervals) or as geometric mean (10 mg/L, one interval since all daphnids qere dead at day 5)).
The time weighted means (nominal 3.2 mg/L) were calculated according to the equation indicated in the OCED guidelines.
Samples with food :
Renewal |
Days |
Conci mg/L |
Conci+1 mg/L |
ln(conci) |
Ln(Conci+1) |
Area |
1 |
2 |
3.510 |
1.810 |
1.256 |
0.593 |
5.134 |
2 |
2 |
3.500 |
1.040 |
1.253 |
0.038 |
4.054 |
3 |
3 |
3.530 |
1.060 |
1.261 |
0.058 |
6.159 |
Total days : 7 |
|
Total area : 15.347 |
||||
|
Time-weighted mean : 2,2mg/L % of nominal : 69% |
Samples without food (used for appraisal of the biological results) :
Renewal |
Days |
Conci mg/L |
Conci+1 mg/L |
ln(conci) |
Ln(Conci+1) |
Area |
1 |
2 |
3.510 |
2.880 |
1.256 |
1.058 |
6.369 |
2 |
2 |
3.500 |
3.440 |
1.253 |
1.235 |
6.940 |
3 |
3 |
3.530 |
1.390 |
1.261 |
0.329 |
6.888 |
Total days : 7 |
|
Total area : 20.198 |
||||
|
Time-weighted mean : 2,9 mg/L % of nominal : 90% |
The geometric means (nominal 10 mg/L) were calculated according to the equation indicated in the OCED guidelines.
Samples with food : 7.5 mg/L
Samples without food (used for appaisal of the biological results) : 10.6 mg/L
Description of key information
The chronic toxicity to the freshwater crustacean species Daphnia magna of the substance 1-Propanaminium, N-(3-aminopropyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-sulfo-, N-(C8-18(even numbered) acyl) derivs., hydroxides, inner salts (EC 939-455-3) was investigated in a GLP-compliant study (Höger, 2013) performed in accordance with OECD Guideline 211 and EU Method C.20 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test). The 21-day NOEC (survival and reproduction) of the substance was found to be 1.39 mg solid content/L based on measured concentrations.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 1.39 mg/L
Additional information
The chronic toxicity to freshwater crustacean species of the substance 1-Propanaminium, N-(3-aminopropyl)-2-hydroxy-N,N-dimethyl-3-sulfo-, N-(C8-18(even numbered) acyl) derivs., hydroxides, inner salts (EC 939-455-3) was investigated in a GLP-compliant study (Höger, 2013) performed in accordance with standard methods, without deviations. The study is considered as reliable (Klimisch 1) and was selected as key study for the endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.