Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
No data
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study on a read-across compound, only briefly described in the secondary literature

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Report date:
1983
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
Toxicity profile. Di(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
Author:
Bibra
Year:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Groups of 12 rats were exposed to DEHS at 25 or 250 mg/m3, 4 hrs/day, 5 days/wk for 13 wk.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
di-(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
IUPAC Name:
di-(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
EC Number:
204-558-8
EC Name:
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
Cas Number:
122-62-3
IUPAC Name:
bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
Test material form:
not specified
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): di(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C26-H50-O4
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 426.677
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): C([C@@H](CCCC)CC)OC(CCCCCCCCC(OC[C@@H](CCCC)CC)=O)=O
- InChl (if other than submission substance): InChI=1S/C26H50O4/c1-5-9-17-23(7-3)21-29-25(27)19-15-13-11-12-14-16-20-26(28)30-22-24(8-4)18-10-6-2/h23-24H,5-22H2,1-4H3
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): see Fig. 1
- Substance type: no data in citing source
- Physical state: no data in citing source
- Analytical purity: no data in citing source
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): no data in citing source
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: no data in citing source
- Isomers composition: no data in citing source
- Purity test date: no data in citing source
- Lot/batch No.: no data in citing source
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data in citing source
- Stability under test conditions: no data in citing source
- Storage condition of test material: no data in citing source

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Fischer 344
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data in citing source
- Age at study initiation: no data in citing source
- Weight at study initiation: no data in citing source
- Fasting period before study: no data in citing source
- Housing: no data in citing source
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data in citing source
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data in citing source
- Acclimation period: no data in citing source

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data in citing source
- Humidity (%): no data in citing source
- Air changes (per hr): no data in citing source
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data in citing source

IN-LIFE DATES: no data in citing source

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
not specified
Vehicle:
not specified
Remarks on MMAD:
MMAD / GSD: No data in citing source
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: no data in citing source
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: no data in citing source
- Source and rate of air: no data in citing source
- Method of conditioning air: no data in citing source
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: no data in citing source
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: no data in citing source
- Air flow rate: no data in citing source
- Air change rate: no data in citing source
- Method of particle size determination: no data in citing source
- Treatment of exhaust air: no data in citing source

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: no data in citing source
- Samples taken from breathing zone: no data in citing source
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
No data in citing source.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
13 wk
Frequency of treatment:
4 hr/day, 5 days/wk
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
25 or 250 mg/m3
Basis:
no data
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Total of 12 animals of unspecified sex in each of the two groups.
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: no data in citing source
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): no data in citing source
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: from citing sources, satellite groups don't appear to have been selected
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: from citing sources, satellite groups don't appear to have been selected
- Section schedule rationale (if not random): no data in citing source
Positive control:
No data in citing source.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
Rats were apparently assessed 1, 7 and 13 weeks after exposure, but no further details are given on any of the examinations performed.
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: no data in citing source
HISTOPATHOLOGY: no data in citing source
Other examinations:
No data in citing source.
Statistics:
No data in citing source.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
not specified
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Details on results:
A secondary source, compiled prior to the results of this study being subject to final analysis, stated that "no significant effects appear evident". Presumably there were no severe treatment-related clinical signs of toxicity, and no treatment-related mortality, but no specific details are given. The finalised results of this study may not have been formalised.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 250 mg/m³ air
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: Apparently no observed adverse effects at highest tested concentration

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In a study very briefly described in the secondary literature, no adverse effects were evidently observed in rats following inhalation exposure to DEHS for 13 weeks, resulting in a study NOAEC of 250 mg/m3.
Executive summary:

A subchronic inhalation study has been conducted on DEHS, a structurally-related read-across compound for DIDS, and is reported very briefly in the secondary literature.

Groups of 12 rats were treated with DEHS at either 25 or 250 mg/m3 for 4 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 13 weeks. Rats were apparently "assessed" after 1, 7 and 13 weeks of exposure [no details are given on the extent of examination, and presumably more frequent assessments were also performed e.g. for mortality and clinical signs of toxicity].

According to a secondary source, final analysis of the data has not been formalised. However, no significant adverse effects were evidently reported [no further details given], therefore a study NOAEC of 250 mg/m3 can be assumed.