Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-974-6 | CAS number: 894-86-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17. November 2003 to 12. February 2004
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Compliant to OECD 473 and GLP guideline. The registered substance oxidizes in the presence of water and air-borne oxygen rapidly to Indigo (CAS No. 482-89-3) and sodium hydroxide.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- TG III.2 Chromosome aberration test with mammalian cells in culture
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Indigo
- IUPAC Name:
- Indigo
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Indigo aus Indigo-Küpe
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C16H10N2O2
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 262.27 g/mol
- Smiles notation (if other than submission substance): O=C3c4ccccc4NC3=C2Nc1ccccc1C2=O
- InChl (if other than submission substance): InChI=1/C16H10N2O2/c19-15-9-5-1-3-7-11(9)17-13(15)14-16(20)10-6-2-4-8-12(10)18-14/h1-8,17-18H
- Structural formula attached as image file (if other than submission substance): see Fig. 1
- Substance type: active substance
- Physical state: solid
- Certificate of analysis: CTS 20031162-SA
- Analytical purity: 99.4%
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): Indol 0.03%, Aniline 0.01%, N-Methylaniline <0.01%
- Purity test date: 14. Oct to 07 Nov. 2003
- Lot/batch No.: V2143/1
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: October 2008
- Storage condition of test material: at approximately 20°C in fume cupboard
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Source: cell bank of "Genetic Toxicology", Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, ProTox
Cell Culture Medium: Mininam essential medium with Earle's salts and L-glutamine - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix rat liver induced with Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9, 655.7, 1311.4, 2622.7 µg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- cell culture medium
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Exposure period (with metabolic activation): 3 hours
Exposure period (without metabolic activation): 3 hours
Fixation time:
20 h; 28 h - Evaluation criteria:
- Non-clastogenic:
- number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of historical control data
- no significant increase in number of structural chromosome aberrations observed
Clastogenic:
- number of induced structural chromosome aberrations in all evaluated dose groups is above the range of historical control data and
- either a concentration-related or a significant increase in number of structural chromosome aberrations observed - Statistics:
- one-sided Fisher's exact test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Test substance is not clastogenic - Executive summary:
The potential of the test item to induce chomosome aberrations was investigated in V79 cells of the Chinese hamster lung in vitro.
The test item was suspended in cell culture medium and the the following concentrations were selected on the basis of cytotoxicity investigations made in a preliminary study (without and with metabolic activation) up to 10 mM (= 2622.7 µg/ml). Both independent experiments were performed in duplicate for concentrations and incubation/expression intervals given below. Evaluations were made for concentrations ranging from little to maximum (50% survival) toxicity:First experiment
with 3/20 h treatment/sampling time
without S9 mix: 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9, 655.7, 1311.4, 2622.7 µg/ml
with S9 mix: 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9, 655.7, 1311.4, 2622.7 µg/ml test item
Second experiment with 20/20 h treatment/sampling time
without S9 mix: 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9, 655.7, 1311.4, 2622.7 µg/ml
Second experiment with 28/28 h treatment/sampling time
without S9 mix: 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9 µg/ml
Second experiment with 3/28 h treatment/sampling time
with S9 mix: 20.5, 41, 82, 164, 327.9, 655.7, 1311.4 µg/ml
After treatment time macroscopic precipitation of the test compound was observed in a dose range of 237.9 µg/ml and above and microscopic precipitation of the test compound in a dose range of 20.5 µg/ml and above.
There were no biologically significant increases in the number of cells showing structural chromosome aberrations, either in the absence or in the presence of metabolic activation, up to and including cytotoxic concentrations. There were no statistical differences between treatment and control groups and no dose-response relationships were noted.
There was no increase in the rate of polyploid or endoreduplicated metaphases in either experiment in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
Appropriate reference mutagens used as positive controls showed a significant increase in chomosome aberrations, thus indicating the sensivty of the assay, and the efficacy of the S9 -mix.
In conclusion, Indigo aus Indigo-Küpe tested up to cytotoxic concentrations, both with and without metabolic activation, did not induce chromosome aberrations in V79 Chinese Hamster lung cells. Therefore, Indigo aus Indigo-Küpe is considered
not clastogenic in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.