Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-226-2 | CAS number: 93924-32-4 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained by treatment of Foot's oil with natural or modified clay in either a contacting or percolation process to remove the trace amounts of polar compounds and impurities present. It consists predominantly of branched chain hydrocarbons with carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C20 through C50.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1985-10-17 to 1986-01-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable without restriction because it was conducted according to OECD guideline 473.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are minor not expected to interfere with study results
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 55/60 Pale Oil, sufficiently refined, IP 346 < 3% (CAS # 64742-53-6)
- IUPAC Name:
- 55/60 Pale Oil, sufficiently refined, IP 346 < 3% (CAS # 64742-53-6)
- Details on test material:
- Read Across to Other Lubricant Base Oils
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): L-01 (55/60 Pale Oil)
CAS number - 64742-53-6
- Substance type: Other Lubricant base oils (sufficiently refined, IP 346 < 3%)
- Physical state: Liquid (clear, colorless)
- Lot/batch No.: TA288
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 1990-09-19
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: McCoy's 5A medium supplemented with 10 percent and 2.5 percent fetal bovine serum, 100 units penicillin and 100 micrograms streptomycin per milliliter, and 2 mM L-glutamine (complete medium)
- Properly maintained: yes (kept at 37±1 degrees Celsius in 5±1 percent carbon dioxide in air)
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: Not reported
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: Not reported
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: Not reported - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Metabolic activation was prepared immediately prior to use from Aroclor-pretreated Sprague-Dawley rat livers. S9 mix consisted of 15 μL S9, 2.4 mg NADP, and 4.5 mg isocitric acid per mL Ham's F-12 medium with 2.5% serum.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary toxicity test: 0.0001, 0.0003, 0.001, 0.003, 0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, and 1 μL/mL, ±S9
Chromosome aberration test: 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.15 μL/mL, -S9; 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 μL/mL, +S9
Triethylenemelamine (TEM, positive control, -S9): dissolved in distilled water for a working concentration of 1 μg/mL
Cyclophosphamide (CP, positive control, +S9): dissolved in distilled water for a working concentration of 100 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (lot 851283)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Complete medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Triethylenemelamine (-S9) and cyclophosphamide (+S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- For the chromosome aberration assay, cultures were seeded in duplicate flasks at 5.0x105 cells/25 cm2 flask for each treatment condition and incubated at 37±1ºC in 5±1% carbon dioxide in air for 16-24 hours. Test material dissolved in DMSO (50 μL), DMSO alone, TEM (-S9), or CP (+S9) was added to the flasks containing either complete (-S9) or S9-reaction mixture (+S9). In the presence of metabolic activation, cells were exposed for 2 hours at 37±1ºC in 5±1% carbon dioxide in air, washed with phosphate buffered saline, refed complete medium, and incubated again for an additional 8 hours. In the absence of metabolic activation, cells were exposed for 10 hours at 37±1ºC in 5±1% carbon dioxide in air. All treated cultures were then incubated with Colcemid (0.1 μg/mL) during the last 2-3 hours prior to harvest. Nontreated flasks contained complete medium only. All other procedures were conducted in a similar manner to treatment flasks.
Metaphase cells were harvested by mitotic shake-off. Collected cells were centrifuged; cell pellet was resuspended in 2-4 mL 0.075 M KCl and allowed to stand at room temperature for 5 minutes. Cells were centrifuged, the supernatant was aspirated, and cells were fixed with two washes with approximately 2 mL Carnoy's fixative and stored overnight (or longer) in Carnoy's fixative at approximately 4ºC.
To prepare slides, fixed cells were centrifuged, supernatant fluid was decanted, and cells were resuspended in Carnoy's fixative. Cell suspension (1-2 drops) was placed in the center of a side and dried overnight. Slides were coded, and dried slides were stained with 5% Giemsa, air dried, and permanently mounted.
Fifty metaphase cells from coded slides were scored in each duplicate flask (i.e., 100 cells per treatment group). Cells were evaluated for chromatid gaps and breaks, chromosome gaps and breaks, chromatid fragments, acentric fragments, dicentrics, rings, triradicals, quadriradials, complex rearrangements, pulverized chromosome(s) and cells, and severely damaged cells (>10 aberrations). Slides were examined microscopically, and the number of polyploid metaphases and metaphases with endoreduplication were counted in a total of 100 metaphase cells. - Evaluation criteria:
- An assay was considered valid if the number of cells with chromosome aberrations in the negative and solvent controls was no greater than 12%, and the frequency of structural chromosome aberrations per cells in the positive control was statistically increased (p≤0.05, Student's t test) relative to the solvent control or untreated control if a solvent other than water was used.
A positive response was considered to be a significant increase (p≤0.05, Student's t test) in the number of structural aberrations per cell in a dose-response manner. A "suspect" response was considered to be a significant increase at the high dose only with no dose-response. An equivocal response was considered to be a significant increase at one dose level other than the high dose with no dose-response. - Statistics:
- Treatment-related effects were expressed relative to controls. The number and types of aberrations were presented for each treatment condition. The percentage of damaged cells in the total population of cells examined was calculated for each treatment condition. The frequency of structural aberrations per cell was calculated for each group. Chromatid and chromosome gaps are presented but were not included in the total percentage of cells with one or more aberrations or in the frequency of structural aberrations per cell. The Student's t test was used to analyze the frequency of structural aberrations per cells. The number of aberrations per cell for each treatment group was compared to the control group using the t test. Significant differences between the number of cells with numerical aberration in the treatment and control group was evaluated by a chi-square analysis using a 2 x 2 contingency table.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Results from the cytotoxicity test showed a marked decrease in relative cell growth at dose 0.3 μL/mL, -S9, and 1 μL/mL, +S9. There were no surviving cells at 1 μL/mL, -S9.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cytogenic Analysis of CHO Cell Treated with L-01 |
|||
Treatment |
Cells with Structural Aberrations (%)a |
Cells with Numerical Aberrations (%)b |
Structural Aberrations per Cella, c |
Without Metabolic Activation |
|||
Untreated cells |
1 |
3 |
0.01 |
DMSO |
0 |
2 |
0.00 |
L-01 |
|
||
0.15 μL/mL |
2 |
0 |
0.02 |
0.08 μL/mL |
1 |
2 |
0.01 |
0.04 μL/mL |
0 |
1 |
0.00 |
0.02 μL/mL |
0 |
1 |
0.00 |
TEM |
|
||
1.0 μg/mL |
22 |
1 |
0.26** |
With Metabolic Activation |
|||
Untreated cells |
0 |
2 |
0.00 |
DMSO |
3 |
2 |
0.03 |
L-01 |
|
||
0.4 μL/mL |
0 |
3 |
0.00 |
0.2 μL/mL |
1 |
2 |
0.01 |
0.1 μL/mL |
1 |
3 |
0.01 |
0.05 μL/mL |
0 |
3 |
0.00 |
CP |
|
||
100 μg/mL |
14 |
2 |
0.14** |
aChromatid and chromosome gaps are not included.
bIncludes endoreduplications and polypoid cells.
cSDC and pulverizations were counted as 10 aberrations.
** Significant at p≤0.01
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
L-01 did not induce any significant increases in chromosome aberrations in cultured CHO cells with or without metabolic activation under the conditions of this study. Positive, vehicle, and nontreated controls performed in an appropriate manner, indicating that the test system could detect both activation-dependent and direct-acting clastogens. - Executive summary:
Read across justification
The physical and chemical properties of foots oils are comparable to the other lubricant base oil intermediate streams from which they are derived. Hence their health effects are also similar to those of other lubricant base oils, and the conclusions of the hazard assessment for other lubricant base oils also apply to foots oils.
In a mammalian cell chromosome aberration assay, Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed to L-01 (batch TA288) at concentrations of 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.15 μL/mL, -S9, for 10 hours and 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 μL/mL, +S9, for 2 hours.
Results from the cytotoxicity test showed a marked decrease in relative cell growth at dose 0.3 μL/mL, -S9, and 1 μL/mL, +S9. There were no surviving cells at 1 μL/mL, -S9. Doses used in the chromosome aberration study were based from these results. Results from the chromosome aberration assay showed no significant structural or numerical aberrations in CHO cells at any dose level, with or without metabolic activation. Positive controls induced the appropriate response.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.