Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
16 Sep - 25 Oct 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Meets national standard methods with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: report on study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2002
Report date:
2002

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Study type:
study with volunteers
Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Marzulli and Maibach method
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no volume of the applied substance specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
GCP

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diisopropyl sebacate
EC Number:
231-306-4
EC Name:
Diisopropyl sebacate
Cas Number:
7491-02-3
Molecular formula:
C16H30O4
IUPAC Name:
diisopropyl sebacate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): only trade name given
- Analytical purity: 100%
- LOT: 02060013

Method

Type of population:
general
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: 55, however only 51 subjects were available at study termination.
- Sex: 13 male, 42 female
- Age: 18-69 years
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: other immunological tests: Marzulli and Maibach Method

ADMINISTRATION
- Type of application: For induction, occlusive exposure for 48 hours, three times a week for three weeks on the back was performed. After a two week recovery period, a challenge exposure was performed under an occlusive dressing for 48 h either on the same site as the induction or another site that had never had contact with the test substance.
- Description of patch: occlusive strip with Flexcon(TruMed Technologies Inc., Burnsville, Minnesota)
- Vehicle / solvent: no
- Concentrations: undiluted test substance (100%)
- Volume applied: no data

EXAMINATIONS
- Grading/Scoring system: see table 1

- Other: After each induction exposure, cutaneous reactions were evaluated directly as well as 24 and 48 h after patch removal.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
SYMPTOMS
- Frequency, level, duration of symptoms observed: No significant reaction attributable to sensitisation was observed in the 51 volunteers finishing the study.


NO. OF PERSONS WITH/OUT REACTIONS COMPARED TO STUDY POPULATION
- Number of subjects with positive reactions: 0
- Number of subjects with negative reactions: 51 (not all subjects finished study up to challenge)
- Number of subjects with irritating reactions: 0/53 (not all subjects continued study up to induction)


Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 2: Subjects with positive reactions at the study stages

Study stage

Subjects with positive reactions/all subjects*

Induction day 1

0/53

Induction day 2

0/53

Induction day 3

0/52

Induction day 4

0/51

Induction day 5

0/51

Induction day 6

0/51

Induction day 7

0/51

Induction day 8

0/51

Induction day 9

1/50**

48h after challenge

0/51

72h after challenge

0/50

96h after challenge

0/48

* The number of subjects changed during the study because of subjects that didn't continue the study or subjects that were not present at single observation days.

** None of the subjects showed any sensitisation to the test material and only one showed slight irritation (+) at day 9 of induction. The test material at 100% when applied to the human skin is not irritating and not sensitising.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In a study with human volunteers the test substance did not show a skin sensitisation potential.