Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 306-111-3 | CAS number: 96152-40-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 June 1992 to 17 September 1992
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The study report was conclusive, done to a valid guidelines and the study was conducted under GLP conditions.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, isooctyl ester, reaction products with glycerol trioleate and sulfur
- EC Number:
- 306-111-3
- EC Name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, isooctyl ester, reaction products with glycerol trioleate and sulfur
- Cas Number:
- 96152-40-8
- IUPAC Name:
- 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, isooctyl ester, reaction products with glycerol trioleate and sulfur
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- S. typhimurium: Histidine synthesis
E. coli: Tryptophan synthesis
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The broth used to grow overnight cultures of tester strains was Vogel-Bonner salt solution supplemented with 2.5% (w/v) Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2. Bottom agar (25 mL per 15 x 100 mm petri dish) was added to the Vogel-Bonner minimal medium E and supplemented with 1.5% (w/v) agar and 0.2% (w/v) glucose. Top agar consisting of 0.7 % w/v agar and 0.5 % w/v sodium chloride was supplemented with 10 mL of 0.5 mM histidine/ biotin solution per 100 mL agar. When S9 mix was required, 2.0 mL of the supplemented top agar was used in the overlay. However, when S9 was not required, water was added to the supplemented top agar (0.5 mL of water per 2 mL of supplemented top agar) and the resulting 2.5 mL of diluted supplemented top agar was used for the overlay.
- Periodically checked for genotype stability: Yes. The presence of the pKM101 plasmid was confirmed for tester strains TA98 and TA100 by demonstration of resistance to ampicillin (10 µg). The presence of the rfa wall mutation was confirmed by testing the sensitivity of each culture to crystal violet (10 µg).
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: Yes. The mean numbers of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle controls that are characteristic of the respective strains were demonstrated by plating 100 µg aliquots of the culture along with the appropriate vehicle on selective media. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: rfa and uvrB mutations present in all strains together with R factor in TA98 and TA100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The broth used to grow overnight cultures of tester strains was Vogel-Bonner salt solution supplemented with 2.5% (w/v) Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2. Bottom agar (25 mL per 15 x 100 mm petri dish) was added to the Vogel-Bonner minimal medium E and supplemented with 1.5% (w/v) agar and 0.2% (w/v) glucose. Top agar consisting of 0.7 % w/v agar and 0.5 % w/v sodium chloride was supplemented with 10 mL of 0.11 mg/mL tryptophan solution per 100 mL agar. When S9 mix was required, 2.0 mL of the supplemented top agar was used in the overlay. However, when S9 was not required, water was added to the supplemented top agar (0.5 mL of water per 2 mL of supplemented top agar) and the resulting 2.5 mL of diluted supplemented top agar was used for the overlay.
- Periodically checked for genotype stability: Yes. The presence of the pKM101 plasmid was confirmed for tester strains TA98 and TA100 by demonstration of resistance to ampicillin (10 µg). The presence of the rfa wall mutation was confirmed by testing the sensitivity of each culture to crystal violet (10 µg).
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: Yes. The mean numbers of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle controls that are characteristic of the respective strains were demonstrated by plating 100 µg aliquots of the culture along with the appropriate vehicle on selective media. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: contains uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- MUTAGENICITY ASSAY
Salmonella typhimurium
3330, 1000, 333, 100, 33.3, 10.0 µg/plate (with S9)
100, 33.3, 10.0, 3.33, 1.00, 0.33 µg/plate (without S9)
Escherichia coli
10000, 3330, 1000, 333, 100, 33.3 µg/plate (with and without S9)
CONFIRMATORY ASSAY
Salmonella typhimurium
3330, 1000, 333, 100, 33.3, 10.0 µg/plate (with S9)
333, 100, 33.3, 10.0, 3.33, 1.00 µg/plate (without S9)
Escherichia coli
3330, 1000, 333, 100, 33.3, 10.0 µg/plate (with S9)
10000, 3330, 1000, 333, 100, 33.3 µg/plate (without S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Acetone
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- plated for all tester strains both in the presence and absence of S9 with no test material
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, ICR-191
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Exposure duration: plates were inverted and incubated for 48 ± 2 hours at 37 ± 2 ºC.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: test concentrations were performed in triplicate
EVALUATION PROCEDURE
The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated for evidence of cytotoxicity and test material precipitate. Evidence of cytotoxicity was scored relative to the vehicle control plate. The numbers of revertant colonies per plate for the vehicle and negative controls and all plates containing test material were counted manually. The numbers of revertant colonies per plate for positive controls were counted by automated colony counter. - Evaluation criteria:
- Test data from individual experiments was considered valid if:
a) tester strain cultures exhibit sensitivity to crystal violet
b) cultures of tester strains TA98 and TA100 exhibit resistance to ampicillin
c) tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate when plated along with the vehicle under selective conditions
d) positive controls must exhibit a 3-fold increase over the value of the vehicle control for that strain
e) a minimum of three non-toxic doses are required to evaluate assay data.
Once the criteria for a valid assay have been met, responses observed in the assay are evaluated as follows:
Tester strains TA98, TA100 and WPuvrA-
For a test material to be considered positive, it must produce at least a 2-fold increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one of these tester strains over the mean revertants per plate of the vehicle control. This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test material.
Tester strains TA1535 and TA1537
For a test material to be considered positive, it must produce at least a 3-fold increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one of these tester strains over the mean revertants per plate of the vehicle control. This increase in the mean number of revertants per plate must be accompanied by a dose response to increasing concentrations of the test material.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- - Test material handling
In acetone the test material formed a cloudy yellow homogenous suspension at 200 mg/mL which was the most concentrated stock dilution of the test material prepared. The test material formed a solution at 20 mg/mL and remained a solution at all subsequent dilutions prepared for the mutagenicity assay.
- Dose Range Finding Study
Doses to be tested in the mutagenicity assay were selected based on the results of the dose rangefinding study conducted on the test material using tester strains TA100 and WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of a 10% S9 mix (one plate per dose). Ten doses of test material, from 10,000 to 10.0 µg/plate, were tested. Under the conditions of the study, cytotoxicity was observed with tester strain TA100 at 667 µg/plate and above in the presence of S9 and at 33.3 µg/plate and above in the absence of S9 as evidenced by a thinning and/or disappearance of the bacterial background lawn and a reduction in the number of revertants per plate. With tester strain WP2uvrA-, cytotoxicity was observed at 10,000 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and at 667 µg/plate in the presence of S9 and at 667 µg/plate in the absence of S9 as evidenced by a slight thinning of the bacterial background lawn and/or a reduction in the number of revertants per plate.
- S9 Optimisation Study
An S9 optimisation study was performed using tester strains TA98 and TA100 with the highest non-cytotoxic dose of test material, 333 µg/plate, and four concentrations of S9 mix (5%, 10%, 20% and 80% S9 homogenate per mL of S9 mix). Under the conditions of the study, no effect was observed due to varying the S9 homogenate concentration in this experiment. In the absence of an effect, a 10% S9 mix was used in the mutagenicity assay. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Mutagenicity Assay
In the initial mutagenicity assay, all data were acceptable and no
positive increases in the number of revertants per plate were observed
with any of the tester strains either in the presence or absence of S9.
After a review of the data generated in the initial mutagenicity assay,
it was decided to increase the doses treated with the Salmonella
tester strains in the absence of S9 and to decrease the doses tested
with the E. coli tester strain in the presence of S9 due to the
observed levels of cytotoxicity.
Confirmatory Mutagenicity Assay
In the confirmatory mutagenicity assay, all data were acceptable and
no positive increases in the number of revertants per plate were
observed with any of the tester strains either in the presence or
absence of S9. In the absence of S9, greater cytotoxicity was observed
than demonstrated in the initial mutagenicity assay. For this reason, it
was decided to retest all strains in the absence of S9 in a further
confirmatory assay.
Further Confirmatory Assay (in the absence of S9)
All data with the Salmonella tester strains were acceptable
and no positive increases in the number of revertants per plate were
observed. The cytotoxicity observed in this experiment was similar to
that observed in the initial mutagenicity assay. No data were generated
with tester strain WP2uvrA- due to an unacceptable mean vehicle control
value for this strain. Tester strain WP2uvrA- was retested in a further
experiment in which all data were acceptable and no positive increase in
the number of revertants per plate was observed in the absence of S9.
Table 1: Mutagenicity Assay Results (means)
With S9 |
Dose (µg)/plate |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
Background lawn |
With S9 |
Dose (µg)/plate |
WP2uvrA- |
Background lawn |
Vehicle control |
25 |
138 |
22 |
4 |
1 |
Vehicle control |
24 |
1 |
||
Negative control |
32 |
120 |
20 |
7 |
1 |
Negative control |
23 |
1 |
||
Test material |
10.0 |
31 |
129 |
21 |
12 |
1 |
Test material |
33.3 |
22 |
1 |
33.3 |
38 |
130 |
21 |
6 |
1 |
100 |
14 |
1 |
||
100 |
26 |
135 |
16 |
7 |
1 |
333 |
21 |
1 |
||
333 |
27 |
114 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
1000 |
9 |
1 |
||
1000 |
20 |
41 |
9 |
4 |
1 |
3330 |
6 |
1sp |
||
3330 |
10 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
2sp |
10000 |
0 |
6mp |
||
Positive control |
1118 |
1152 |
303 |
208 |
1 |
Positive control |
302 |
1 |
||
Without S9 |
Without S9 |
|||||||||
Vehicle control |
17 |
95 |
17 |
5 |
1 |
Vehicle control |
16 |
1 |
||
Negative control |
18 |
99 |
16 |
8 |
1 |
Negative control |
21 |
1 |
||
Test material |
0.33 |
21 |
93 |
17 |
7 |
1 |
Test material |
33.3 |
17 |
1 |
1.00 |
15 |
102 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
100 |
11 |
1 |
||
3.33 |
16 |
94 |
9 |
8 |
1 |
333 |
19 |
1 |
||
10.0 |
15 |
108 |
13 |
6 |
1 |
1000 |
21 |
1 |
||
33.3 |
12 |
81 |
12 |
6 |
2 |
3330 |
18 |
2 |
||
100 |
9 |
70 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
10000 |
17 |
2 |
||
Positive control |
178 |
608 |
516 |
362 |
1 |
Positive control |
484 |
1 |
Table 2: Confirmatory Assay Results (means)
With S9 | Dose (µg)/plate | TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | Background lawn | With S9 | Dose (µg)/plate | WP2uvrA- | Background lawn |
Vehicle control | 36 | 132 | 14 | 8 | 1 | Vehicle control | 23 | 1 | ||
Negative control | 35 | 137 | 11 | 10 | 1 | Negative control | 25 | 1 | ||
Test material | 10.0 | 31 | 138 | 11 | 6 | 1 | Test material | 10.0 | 18 | 1 |
33.3 | 32 | 149 | 13 | 11 | 1 | 33.3 | 13 | 1 | ||
100 | 39 | 124 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 100 | 14 | 1 | ||
333 | 27 | 133 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 333 | 13 | 1 | ||
1000 | 23 | 47 | 7 | 5 | 2sp | 1000 | 13 | 1 | ||
3330 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2sp | 3330 | 4 | 1sp | ||
Positive control | 1434 | 1594 | 419 | 213 | 1 | Positive control | 516 | 1 | ||
Without S9 | Without S9 | |||||||||
Vehicle control | 18 | 97 | 11 | 6 | 1 | Vehicle control | 11 | 1 | ||
Negative control | 18 | 107 | 11 | 5 | 1 | Negative control | 18 | 1 | ||
Test material | 1.00 | 16 | 107 | 12 | 5 | 1 | Test material | 33.3 | 15 | 1 |
3.33 | 13 | 111 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 100 | 18 | 1 | ||
10.0 | 11 | 76 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 333 | 15 | 2 | ||
33.3 | 16 | 100 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1000 | 8 | 2 | ||
100 | 10 | 66 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3330 | 1 | 2sp | ||
333 | 4 | 28 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10000 | 0 | 3sp | ||
Positive control | 174 | 570 | 542 | 362 | 1 | Positive control | 1041 | 1 |
Table 3: Further Confirmatory Assay Results (means)
Without S9 | Dose (µg)/plate | TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | Background lawn | Without S9 (1) | Dose (µg)/plate | WP2uvrA- (1) | Background lawn (1) | WP2uvrA- (2) | Background lawn (2) |
Vehicle control | 12 | 111 | 12 | 6 | 1 | Vehicle control | 176 | 1 | 18 | 1 | ||
Negative control | 12 | 109 | 11 | 5 | 1 | Negative control | NC | 1 | 19 | 1 | ||
Test material | 1.00 | 19 | 112 | 11 | 8 | 1 | Test material | 33.3 | NC | 1 | 20 | 1 |
3.33 | 16 | 111 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 100 | NC | 1 | 20 | 1 | ||
10.0 | 11 | 96 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 333 | NC | 1 | 15 | 1 | ||
33.3 | 16 | 98 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1000 | NC | 1 | 16 | 2 | ||
100 | 10 | 69 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 3330 | NC | 2 | 1 | 2sp | ||
333 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10000 | NC | 3 | 0 | 3sp | ||
Positive control | 211 | 861 | 692 | 353 | 1 | Positive control | NC | 1 | 721 | 1 |
NC = not counted due to unacceptable mean vehicle control value
Background Lawn Evaluation Codes
1 = normal
2 = slightly reduced
3 = moderately reduced
sp = slight precipitate
mp = moderate precipitate
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under the conditions of the study, in both an initial and confirmatory assay, the test material did not cause a positive increase in the number of revertants per plate of any of the tester strains either in the presence or absence of microsomal enzymes prepared from Aroclor™-induced rat liver (S9). - Executive summary:
The potential of the test material to cause gene mutation in bacterial strains was determined following a methodology similar to that outlined in the standardised guideline OECD 471. During the study, four strains of Salmonella typhimurium (TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537) and one strain of Escherichia coli (WP2uvrA-) were treated in the presence and absence of a rat liver derived metabolic activation system (S9 mix). In two separate assays, the test material did not induce any significant increases in the number of revertant colonies, in any of the tester strains, either in the presence or absence of S9 mix.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.