Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 309-496-6 | CAS number: 100402-60-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Ames Test:
The potential of the test item to induce gene mutations was investigated in the bacterial reverse mutation assay according to guideline OECD 471, EU method B 13/14, and EPA OPPTS 870.5100. The Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537, and TA 102 were tested in the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) for mutagenic activity. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix from phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rats). The test item was dissolved in DMSO. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations were prepared and used in the experiments:
Eperiment I and Experiment II:
31.6, 100, 316, 1000, 2500, and 5000 µg/plate
No precipitation of the test item was observed in any tester strain used in experiment I and II (with and without metabolic activation).
No toxic effects of the test item were noted in any of the five tester strains used up to the highest dose group evaluated (with and without metabolic activation) in experiment I and II.
No biologically relevant increases on revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with the test item at any concentration level, neither in the present nor absence of metabolic activation in experiment I and experiment II.
The reference mutagens induced a distinct increase of revertant colonies indicating the validity of the experiments.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial revrse mutation assay.
Chromosome aberration test:
The possible potential of the test item to induce structural chromosome aberrations was tested in the Chinese hamster V79 cells in the vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test according to OECD guideline 473, EU method B 10, and EPA OPPTS 870.5375.
The chromosomes were prepared 20 h after start of treatment with the test item. The treatment interval was 4 h with and without metabolic activation (S 9 mix from phenobarbital/ß-naphthoflavone induced rats) in experiment I. In experiment II, the treatment interval was 4 h with and 20 h without metabolic activation. Duplicate cultures were treated at each concentration. 100 metaphases per culture were scored for structural chromosomal aberrations.The following concentrations were evaluated for the microscopic analysis of chromosomal aberrations:
Experiment I:
with and without metabolic activation: 100, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
Experiment II:
with metabolic activation: 3000, 4000 and 5000 µg/mL
without metabolic activation: 1000, 2500 and 5000 µg/mL
No precipitation and no toxic effects of the test item were noted with and without metabolic activation in all dose groups evaluated in experiment I and II.
In both experiments no biologically relevant increase of the aberration rates was noted after treatment with the test item with and without metabolic activation. The aberration rates of all dose groups treated with the test item were within the historical control data of the negative control.
In the experiments I and II with and without metabolic activation no biologically relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid cells was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the controls.
EMS (600 and 900 µg/mL) and CPA (0.83 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and induced distinct and biologically relevant increases in cells with structural chromosomal aberrations.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described in vitro chromosomal aberration test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the Chinese hamster V79 cell line.Therefore, the test item is considered to be non-clastogenic.
HPRT test:
An in vitro cell gene mutation test according to OECD guideline 476 and GLP was conducted with D-Glucose, ether with glycerol using Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO).
Cells were incubated for 4 hours with metabolic activation and for 4 and 24 hours without metabolic activation. Concentrations of 625, 1250, 2500 and the limit dose of 5000 µg/mL were analyzed for gene mutation. No precipitation or cytotoxicity of about or below 20% of the respective negative control was observed.
The negative controls gave mutant frequencies within the range expected for the CHO cell line. Both positive control substances, Ethylmethanesulfonate and 7,12-Dimethylbenzanthracene, without and with metabolic activation, respectively, led to the expected increase in the frequencies of forward mutations.
Thus, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test substance D-Glucose, ether with glycerol is not mutagenic in the HPRT locus assay under in vitro conditions in CHO cells in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
In conclusion, D-Glucose, ether with glycerol was found not to be mutagenic in vitro in a bacterial reverse mutation assay and in a chromosomal aberration and a gene mutation test in mammalian cell culture.
Short description of key information:
Ames Test:
The test item is considered to be non-mutagenic in the bacterial reverse mutation assay.
Chromosome aberration test:
Under the experimental conditions, the test item did not induce chromosomal aberrations in vitro.
HPRT test:
Under the experimental conditions, the test item did not induce gene mutation at the HPRT locus.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification and labelling is required according to Regulation No (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) or Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.