Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1972
Report date:
1972

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
dose volume per kg body weight exceeded the value of 20 mL recommended in the guideline for aqueous suspensions in the highest treatment; no weighing after administration; observation period 7 d
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
GLP was not compulsory at the time the study was conducted
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methylbut-3-en-2-ol
EC Number:
204-068-4
EC Name:
2-methylbut-3-en-2-ol
Cas Number:
115-18-4
Molecular formula:
C5H10O
IUPAC Name:
2-methylbut-3-en-2-ol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 2-methylbut-3-en-2-ol
- Analytical purity: 98.5-99%
- Physical state: clear liquid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gassner (breeder)
- Weight at study initiation: mean 248 g (males), 178 g (females)

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 20%


MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 25 mL/kg bw (at 5000 mg/kg bw; amount of applied suspension varied with respective dose groups)
Doses:
1000, 1250, 1600, 2000, 2500, 3200, 4000 and 5000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 7 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: daily observation and several times on the day of application; body weight was determined before the start of the study only
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
ca. 1 800 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
5000 mg/kg bw: all animals died within 24 h, thereof 2 males within 30 min
4000 mg/kg bw: all animals died within 24 h
3200 mg/kg bw: all animals died within 24 h
2500 mg/kg bw: all animals died within 3 d, thereof 4 males and 4 females within 48 h
2000 mg/kg bw: 4/5 males and all females died within 7 d, thereof 3 males and 4 females within 48 h
1600 mg/kg bw: 1/5 male died within 3 d, no female died
1250 mg/ kg bw: 1/5 male died within 48 h and 1/5 females died within 3 d
1000 mg/kg bw: no mortality observed
Clinical signs:
other: Immediately after dosing: tumbling, dyspnea, cyanosis; after 30 min: narcosis-like state, flat respiration, opaque and partially closed eyes, salivation and nose discharge, abdominal position, missing defence reaction; after 1 day: apathy, accelerated res
Gross pathology:
Cardiac dilatation, general congestion, slight gastric dilatation, isolated bloody erosions in the stomach, aqueous diarrheic and sporadic hematolised intestine content.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In a pretest, doses of 200, 1000, 1600 and 5000 mg/kg bw were administered to groups of 5 animals per sex. Here, no animals died in the 200 and 1000 mg/kg bw treatments, respectively, while one male and one female died at 1600 mg/kg bw and all animals died in the 5000 mg/kg bw treatment.

Applicant's summary and conclusion