Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 263-214-5 | CAS number: 61792-11-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2005-05-23 to 2005-06-28
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of inspection - 2004-06-03, 2004-07-19 to 2004-07-22; date of signature 2005-01-06
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (2Z/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (2Z/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Reference substance name:
- (2Z/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (2Z/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Reference substance name:
- (2E/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (2E/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Reference substance name:
- (2E/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (2E/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-2,6-dienenitrile
- Reference substance name:
- (3E/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-3,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (3E/6Z)-3,7-dimethylnona-3,6-dienenitrile
- Reference substance name:
- (3E/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-3,6-dienenitrile
- Molecular formula:
- C11H17N
- IUPAC Name:
- (3E/6E)-3,7-dimethylnona-3,6-dienenitrile
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
impurity 1
impurity 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelman GmbH, D-33178 Borchen, Germany
- Age at study initiation: males 5-8 wks; females 7-10 wks
- Weight at study initiation: Males - mean 37.6 g, std dev. 2.8 g. Females - mean 33.9 g, std dev. 1.9 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: Yes (within sexes)
- Fasting period before study: No data
- Housing: Singly in Makrolon Type I cages with wire mesh top.
- Diet: Pelleted standard diet ad libitum.
- Water: tap water ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: Minimum of 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 ± 3°C
- Humidity: 30-80 %
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle: Corn oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data
- Concentrations of test material in vehicle: 50mg/mL, 100mg/mL, 200 mg/mL
- Volume administered: 10 mL/kg bw - Details on exposure:
- No data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- No applicable
- Frequency of treatment:
- Each animal treated once.
- Post exposure period:
- 24 hr and 48 hr.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
500 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
24 hr preparation interval only.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
24 hr preparation interval only.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
24 and 48 hr preparation intervals.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2000 mg/kg bw dose level - 12 males, 12 females.
500 and 1000 mg/kg bw dose levels - 6 males, 6 females. - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): The stability of CPA at room temperature is sufficient. At 25 °C only 3.5 % of its potency is lost after 24 hr.
- Route of administration: Oral
- Vehicle: Corn oil
- Dose: 40 mg/kg bw
- Volume administered: 10 mL/kg bw
- Concentration: 4 mg/mL
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tissue: Bone marrow.
Cell type: Erythrocyte - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION:
- A pre-experiment for toxicity was initially performed sequencially with doses of 100 mg/kg bw, 500 mg/kg bw and 2000 mg/kg bw. 4 animals were treated per dose.
- A maximum dose of 2000 mg/kg bw for non-toxic test items is standard practice for this type of test.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES:
- 24 hr and 48 hr after treatment
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:
- Animals sacrificed by CO₂ asphyxiation and were then bled. The femora were removed, ephiphyses were cut off and the marrow flushed out with foetal calf serum using a syringe. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1500 rpm (390 G) for 10 mins and the supernatant was discarded. A small drop of the resuspended cell pellet was spread on a slide. The smear was air-dried and then stained with May-Grünwald/Giemsa. Cover slips were mounted with EUKITT. At least one slide was made from each bone marrow sample.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
- Evaluation of the slides was performed using Nikon microscopes with 100× oil immersion objectives. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) were analysed per animal for micronuclei. To describe a toxic effect the ratio between polychromatic and total erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and expressed as PCEs per 2000 erythrocytes. The analysis was performed on coded slides
- 10 animals (5 male, 5 female) per test group were evaluated. The 6th animal is a spare in case of mortality. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a dose-related increase or a clear increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in a single dose group. Statistical methods (see below) can be used as an aid to evaluating the results. However, the primary point of consideration is the biological relevance of those results.
A test item that fails to produce a biologically-relevant increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered non-mutagenic. - Statistics:
- Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- At > 500 mg/kg bw
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 100, 500, 2000 mg/kg bw
- Some animals exhibited clinicial signs of toxicity at doses > 500 mg/kg bw. See attached supporting materials for details.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Some animals exhibited clinical signs of toxicity at doses > 500 mg/kg bw. See attached supporting materials for details.
- The mean micronucleus frequencies for all dose groups of the test material were below the vehicle control value
- Statistical evaluation: Since the mean micronucleus frequencies for all dose groups of the test material were below the vehicle control value were not tested for significance. The positive control value was found to be significantly different (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.0001).
- See attached supporting materials for full details.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bon marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, Lemonile is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay (OECD guideline 474).
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to investigate the potential of Lemonile to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) in the bone marrow of the mouse,
The test item was formulated in corn oil, which was also used as vehicle control. The volume administered orally was 10mL/Kg b.w. 24 h and 48 h after single administration of the test item the bone marrow cells were collected for micronuclei analysis.
Ten animals (5 males, 5 females) per test group were evaluated for the occurrence of micronuclei. At least 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) per animal were scored for micronuclei.
To describe a cytotoxic effect due to the treatment with the test item the ratio between polychromatic and total erythrocytes was determined in the same sample and reported as the number of PCEs per 2000 erythrocytes.
The following dose levels of the test item were investigated:
24 h preparation interval: 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg bw
48 h preparation interval: 2000 mg/kg bw
The highest dose (2000 mg/kg maximum guideline-recommended dose) was estimated by a pre-experiment to be suitable.
After treatment with the test item the number of PCEs was not substantially decreased as compared to the mean value of PCEs of the vehicle control thus indicating that Lemonile did not exert any cytotoxic effects in the bone marrow. However, in the main experiment two females as well as one male were found dead at the 24h observation interval after treatment with the high dose.
In comparison to the corresponding vehicle controls there was no biologically relevant or statistically significant enhancement in the frequency of the detected micronuclei at any preparation interval after administration of the test item and with any dose level used.
40 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide administered orally was used as positive control which showed a substantial increase of induced micronucleus frequency.
In conclusion, it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by the micronucleus test with bon marrow cells of the mouse. Therefore, Lemonile is considered to be non-mutagenic in this micronucleus assay.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.