Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Repeated dose toxicity: Oral

Based on the data available, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the test chemical was considered to be 230 mg/Kg bw using male and female rats. Hence the test chemical is not likely to be toxic upon repeated exposure by oral route as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

This end point was considered for waiver since according to Annex IX of the REACH regulation, testing by the inhalation route is appropriate only if exposure of humans via inhalation is likely. The test chemical has very low vapor pressure of 9.40E-11 Pa (7.05E-013  mmHg). Also, the test chemical has a particle size distribution of 25-150 micron, so the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore this end point for repeated dose toxicity by inhalation route is considered for waiver.

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal

Based on the data available, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the test chemical was considered to be 500 mg/Kg bw using rabbits. Hence the test chemical is not likely to be toxic upon repeated exposure by dermal route as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Toxic effect type:
dose-dependent

Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
sub-chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Experimental data from study report
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Refer below principle
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The 90 days subchronic repeated dose oral toxicity study was designed to evaluate the toxic effects of test chemical in dogs.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of the test chemical: D and C green 6
- IUPAC name: 1,4-bis[(4-methylphenyl)amino]-9,10-anthraquinone
- Molecular formula: C28H22N2O2
- Molecular weight: 418.4938 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Species:
dog
Strain:
not specified
Details on species / strain selection:
No data
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data
Route of administration:
oral: feed
Details on route of administration:
No data
Vehicle:
other: diet
Details on oral exposure:
No data
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
No data
Duration of treatment / exposure:
90 days
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Dose / conc.:
290 other: mg/kg/day
Remarks:
Basis: nominal in diet
Dose / conc.:
570 other: mg/kg/day
Remarks:
Basis: nominal in diet
Dose / conc.:
500 other: mg/kg/day
Remarks:
Basis: nominal in diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
At 290 mg/kg/day: 2 dogs
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
In a 90 day subchronic study, two dogs were fed a diet containing 1 percent test chemical during week 1 (290 mg/kg/day); the concentration was increased to 2 percent during week 3 (570 and 500 mg/kg/day) and 3 percent during week 5. The weight normalized doses fluctuated between 610 and 1400 mg/kg/day during the remainder of the experiment.
Positive control:
No data
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Other examinations:
No data
Statistics:
No data
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no gross signs of toxicity was observed.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No significant changes in body weight was observed in treated dogs.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not examined
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not examined
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Only an accumulation of dye in the pelvis of the kidney, in the mucosa of the small and large intestines, in adipose tissue, and in the gall bladder were observed.
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No histopathological alterations were observed in treated dogs.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on results:
No data
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
570 other: mg/kg/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: No effect on body weight, gross pathology and histopathology
Remarks on result:
other: No toxic effects were observed
Critical effects observed:
not specified
System:
other: not specified
Organ:
not specified
Conclusions:
The No observed Adeverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for test chemical in dogs by the oral route is considered to be 570 mg/kg body weight upon repeated exposure by oral route for 90 days.

Executive summary:

The 90 days subchronic toxicity study was designed to evaluate the toxic effects of test chemical in dogs. Two dogs were fed a diet containing 1 percent test chemical 3 during week 1 (290 mg/kg/day); the concentration was increased to 2 percent during week 3 (570 and 500 mg/kg/day) and 3 percent during week 5. The weight normalized doses fluctuated between 610 and 1400 mg/kg/day during the remainder of the experiment. There were no gross signs of toxicity, and no significant changes in body weight. Necropsy revealed only an accumulation of dye in the pelvis of the kidney, in the mucosa of the small and large intestines, in adipose tissue, and in the gall bladder. No histopathological alterations were observed; therefore, test chemical was not found to be toxic under the conditions of this test. Based on the observations made, The No observed Adeverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for test chemical in dogs by the oral route is considered to be 570 mg/kg body weight upon repeated exposure by oral route for 90 days.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
230 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subchronic
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
The data is from K2 article

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity: inhalation, other
Data waiving:
exposure considerations
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Quality of whole database:
Waiver

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
chronic toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Experimental data from study report
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Refer below principle
Principles of method if other than guideline:
95 weeks chronic repeated dose toxicity study of test chemical in mouse was conducted to evaluate the adverse effects by dermal route.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of the test chemical: D and C green 6
- IUPAc name: 1,4-bis[(4-methylphenyl)amino]-9,10-anthraquinone
- Molecular formula: C28H22N2O2
- Molecular weight: 418.4938 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
Species:
mouse
Strain:
not specified
Details on species / strain selection:
No data
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data
Type of coverage:
not specified
Vehicle:
other: Benzene
Details on exposure:
No data
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
No data
Duration of treatment / exposure:
95 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Weekly
Dose / conc.:
1 other: mg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
no data
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
Single weekly applications of 1 mg of Solvent Green 3 in 0.1 mL of benzene to the skin of mice for 95 weeks.
Positive control:
No data
Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
No data
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Other examinations:
No data
Statistics:
No data
Clinical signs:
not specified
Dermal irritation:
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The thyroid glands in the male mice were enlarged.
Neuropathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Histopathological examination did not show any effect.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Details on results:
No significant local or systemic effects were observed in treated mice.

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 other: mg
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
other: No significant local or systemic effects. The thyroid glands in the male mice were enlarged, but histopathological examination did not show an effect.
Remarks on result:
other: No toxic effects were observed
Critical effects observed:
not specified
System:
other: not specified
Organ:
not specified
Conclusions:
The No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1 mg when mice were treated with test chemical for 95 weeks.
Executive summary:

In a repeated dose dermal toxicity study, mice were treated with test chemical A single weekly application of 1 mg of test chemical in 0.1 mL of benzene to the skin of mice for 95 weeks did not cause significant local or systemic effects. The thyroid glands in the male mice were enlarged, but histopathological examination did not show an effect. Therefore, the No observed adverse effect  level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1 mg when mice were treated with test chemical for 95 weeks.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
500 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subchronic
Species:
rabbit
Quality of whole database:
The data is from K2 article

Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Data available for the target chemical was reviewed to determine the toxic nature of upon repeated exposure. The studies are as mentioned below:

Repeated dose toxicity: Oral

Study 1

In a 6-week dose range-finding study in rats, test chemical was administered in the diet at concentrations of 0.1, 0.23, 0.55, 1.29, or 3,0 percent (100, 230, 550, 1290 or 3000 mg/kg bw). There were no deaths or gross signs of toxicity. Food consumption and body weights were within normal range. The thyroid gland was small in animals fed the 0.55 (550 mg/kg bw/day) and the 3.0 (3000 mg/kg bw/day) percent diets, but histopathological evaluation did not reveal abnormalities in the thyroid gland. Gross degenerative changes in the liver were observed and confirme the by histopathological examination, which showed an increase in vacuolated cells around the hepatic central vein. No other effects were observed. Therefore, the No observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) was considered to be 230 mg/kg bw/day when rats were treated with test chemical orally in feed for 6 weeks.

Study 2 

The 90 days subchronic toxicity study was designed to evaluate the toxic effects of test chemical in dogs. Two dogs were fed a diet containing 1 percent test chemical 3 during week 1 (290 mg/kg/day); the concentration was increased to 2 percent during week 3 (570 and 500 mg/kg/day) and 3 percent during week 5. The weight normalized doses fluctuated between 610 and 1400 mg/kg/day during the remainder of the experiment. There were no gross signs of toxicity, and no significant changes in body weight. Necropsy revealed only an accumulation of dye in the pelvis of the kidney, in the mucosa of the small and large intestines, in adipose tissue, and in the gall bladder. No histopathological alterations were observed; therefore, test chemical was not found to be toxic under the conditions of this test. Based on the observations made, The No observed Adeverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for test chemical in dogs by the oral route is considered to be 570 mg/kg body weight upon repeated exposure by oral route for 90 days.

Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation

This end point was considered for waiver since according to Annex IX of the REACH regulation, testing by the inhalation route is appropriate only if exposure of humans via inhalation is likely. The test chemical has very low vapor pressure of 9.40E-11 Pa (7.05E-013  mmHg). Also, the test chemical has a particle size distribution of 25-150 micron, so the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore this end point for repeated dose toxicity by inhalation route is considered for waiver.

 

Repeated dose toxicity: Dermal

Study1

Repeated dose dermal toxicity were evaluated in rabbit by using test chemical.The test chemical was applied at a dose of 500 mg for 13 weeks. No local toxic and no systemic toxic effects were observed in treated rabbits. Therefore, the No observed Adeverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 500 mg/kg when rabbits were treated with test chemical for 13 weeks.

Study 2

In a repeated dose dermal toxicity study, mice were treated with test chemical A single weekly application of 1 mg of test chemical in 0.1 mL of benzene to the skin of mice for 95 weeks did not cause significant local or systemic effects. The thyroid glands in the male mice were enlarged, but histopathological examination did not show an effect. Therefore, the No observed adverse effect  level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1 mg when mice were treated with test chemical for 95 weeks.

Based on the above mentioned subchronic and chronic repeated-dose study conducted in experimental animals, no significant toxic effects were seen to occur upon repeated exposure by oral route. Hence, based on the above studies summarized with dermal routes it can be observed that the test chemical is not likely to be toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the data available for the target chemical, is not likely to be toxic upon repeated exposure by oral, dermal and inhalation route of exposure as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.