Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-641-8 | CAS number: 5444-75-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 27 November 2017 to 12 March 2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of mixing into soil:
1 Pre-test: Prior to treatment the initial moisture content of the soil was determined as 20.47% and the volume required to achieve 35% moisture content was calculated as 162 mL reverse osmosis (RO) water/1100 g dry soil. The required water was added after the treated sand (10 g) had been mixed into a 1090 g dry weight equivalent of moist soil. The treated moist soil was mixed thoroughly using a hand held electric mixer.
2 Main study: Prior to treatment the initial moisture content of the soil was determined as 21.21% and the maximum water holding capacity (MWHC) as 59.33%. A moisture content equivalent to 50% of MWHC was selected as providing suitable conditions for earthworm development and the soil was not pre-moistened as the moisture content was greater than 25% of the MWHC. The volume required to achieve 50% of the maximum water holding capacity was calculated as 190.25 mL water/2200 g dry ISO earthworm soil which was added after the test item in sand had been mixed into a 2180 g dry weight equivalent of moist soil. Treatment soil was mixed using a hand held electric mixer.
- Controls:
1 Pre-test: 162 mL RO water was mixed into a 1090 g dry weight equivalent of moist soil plus 10 g sand, to bring the soil to 35% moisture content.
2 Main study: 363.17 mL RO water was mixed into a 4162 g dry weight equivalent of moist soil to which 38 g dry sand had been added to bring the soil to 50% of the maximum water holding capacity.
Carbendazim solution (100 mL) was mixed into a 4162 g dry weight equivalent of moist soil to which 38 g dry sand had been added. An additional 263.17 mL RO water was also mixed in to achieve a soil concentration of 4.775 mg a.i./kg dry soil and 50% of the maximum water holding capacity. - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: earth worm
- Source: undisclosed supplier
- Age at test initiation; 2 months to 1 year (of reproductive maturity, i.e. production of egg cocoons or presence of a clitellum)
- Weight at test initiation : average per replicate 338-344 mg
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 24 hours
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): yes
- Health during acclimation (any mortality observed): no data - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 4 wk
- Remarks:
- adults during 4 weeks, followed by treatment of juveniles for 4 weeks
- Test temperature:
- 18.1 – 22.0 ºC
- pH:
- day 1: 6.0-6.2
day 56: 6.5-6.9 - Moisture:
- day 1: adjusted to 50% of MWHC (59.33%)
day 56: group mean : 32.74 to 34.48% equivalent to 55.17 – 58.11% MWHC - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): plastic container 11 x 17 x 5 cm, each covered with a tight fitting lid
- Amount of soil or substrate: 500 g dry soil (648 g wet soil (50% MWHC)
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
- No. of replicates per control: 8
- No. of replicates per positive control (Carbendazim 4.77 mg/kg dw): 8
PROPERTIES OF ARTIFICIAL SOIL (OECD 207)
- % industrial quartz sand: 70
- % peat: 10
- % kaolin clay: 20
- Maximum water holding capacity (in % dry weigth): 59.33%
- pH: 6.4 --> adjusted to 6.0 with calcium carbonate
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 12/12 h
- Light intensity: 408 - 711 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED;
Adults: mortality on day 28; behavioural and pathological signs daily; body weight prior to treatment (individually) and on day 28 (per replicate)
Juveniles: survivors on day 56
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study: There was an adverse effect on survival at 14 days after treatment with 0% mortality at 62.5, 125 and 250 mg a.i./kg dry soil, 5% mortality at 500 mg a.i./kg dry soil and 30% mortality at 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil. No mortality was observed in the water control group. There were no biologically significant treatment related differences in bodyweight of surviving earthworms between the treatment and control groups at 62.5, 125, 250 and 500 mg a.i./kg dry soil. A biologically significant treatment related effect was observed at 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Carbendazim 4.77 mg/kg dw
- Duration:
- 4 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- in adults
- Duration:
- 4 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 555.6 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks:
- in adults
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks:
- number of surviving juveniles
- Duration:
- 8 wk
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks:
- number of surviving juveniles
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period: Adult mortality of 0% was recorded at the 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6 and 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rates. Mortality of 32.5% was recorded at 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rate (***p<0.001). This compared to 0% control mortality. Mortality of 10% was recorded in the positive control treatment.
- Total mass of adults at beginning of test: mean 338-344 mg
- Changes in body weight of live adults (% of initial weight) at end of exposure period: +94.7, +84.9, +95.3, +91.5, +102.1, +109.8, +106.1, +109.1 and +113.3% at 0, 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil (positive control -33.3%)
- No. of offspring produced on day 56: 238, 256, 271, 256, 239, 259, 275, 239 and 185 at 0, 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil (positive controll 0.25) - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Mortality: 10%
Bodyweight changes: - 33.3%
No of surviving juveniles: 0.25 - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- no statistically significant effects on adult mortality except at 1000 mg/kg dw (p<0.001 Fishers exact test)
statistically significant effects on adult bw at 171.5 (p = 0.047), 308.6 (p=0.047), 555.6 (p=0.027) and 1000 mg/kg dw (p=0.007, fishers exact test))
no statistically significant effects on number of juveniles - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The adult LC50 was determined to be greater than 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil, the highest rate tested. A treatment related NOEC of 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil was achieved.
The EC50 for the number of juveniles on Day 56 could not be determined because there was not a clear dose-response relationship. A NOEC of 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil was achieved. - Executive summary:
In a test according to OECD 222 eight groups of four replicates (each 10 worms) were treated with the test item at test rates of 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil, mixed into the soil. A similar water control group with eight replicates was maintained in untreated soil to act as a negative control, and a positive control group, with eight replicates, was treated with carbendazim at ca.5 mg a.i./kg dry soil. Adult worms were removed from the soil four weeks after treatment and the juvenile worms reared for a further four weeks.
Adult mortality of 0% was recorded at rates of 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6 and 555.6, mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rates. Mortality of 32.5% was recorded at 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rate (p<0.001), compared to 0% mortality in the water control group. Adult mortality of 10% was recorded in the positive control treatment.
The adult LC50 was determined to be greater than 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil, the highest rate tested.The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for adult mortality was 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
There was no statistically significant adverse effect on biomass as a function of adult bodyweight at any test item treatment rate. There was however a statistically significant increase in bodyweights. The adjusted mean bodyweight in the positive control group was 227 mg, significantly lower than the water control group (p<0.001), with a reduction of 33.3% in adjusted mean bodyweights.
There was no statistically significant reduction in the number of juveniles produced at any test item treatment rate up to and including 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil. The EC50 for the number of juveniles on Day 56 could not be determined because there was not a clear dose-response relationship. A NOEC (reproduction) of 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil was achieved.
Reference
% Adult Mortality and Mean Bodyweights and Bodyweight Change (mg)
Treatment |
(mg a.i./kg dry soil) |
% Mortality |
p-value |
Day of study |
(%) Change(b) |
p-value |
||
Day 0 |
Day 28 |
Day 28(a) |
||||||
Water control |
0 |
0 |
- |
341 |
664 |
664 |
+94.7 |
- |
2-ethylhexyl benzoate |
16.3 |
0 |
>0.999 |
344 |
636 |
632 |
+84.9 |
1.000 |
29.4 |
0 |
>0.999 |
341 |
666 |
666 |
+95.3 |
1.000 |
|
52.9 |
0 |
>0.999 |
341 |
653 |
652 |
+91.5 |
1.000 |
|
95.3 |
0 |
>0.999 |
338 |
683 |
685 |
+102.1 |
0.399 |
|
171.5 |
0 |
>0.999 |
338 |
709 |
711 |
+109.8 |
0.047* |
|
308.6 |
0 |
>0.999 |
343 |
707 |
705 |
+106.1 |
0.047* |
|
555.6 |
0 |
>0.999 |
341 |
713 |
713 |
+109.1 |
0.027* |
|
1000 |
32.5 |
<0.001*** |
339 |
723 |
724 |
+113.3 |
0.007** |
|
Carbendazim |
5 |
10 |
0.003** |
339 |
226 |
227 |
-33.3 |
<0.001*** |
- Not applicable
(a) adjusted mean weights
(b) calculated from non-adjusted means
*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 Fishers exact test
Mean Number of Juvenile Worms per Treatment Replicate
Treatment |
(mg a.i./kg dry soil) |
Day 56 |
pvalue |
Water control |
0 |
238 |
- |
2-ethylhexyl benzoate |
16.3 |
256 |
0.471 |
29.4 |
271 |
0.060 |
|
52.9 |
256 |
0.729 |
|
95.3 |
239 |
1.000 |
|
171.5 |
259 |
0.471 |
|
308.6 |
275 |
0.212 |
|
555.6 |
239 |
1.000 |
|
1000 |
185 |
0.409 |
|
Carbendazim |
5 |
0.25 |
<0.001*** |
Co-efficient of variation of the water control group = 5.85%
All rates were compared against the water control group using Dunnett’s test
***p<0.001
Description of key information
In a test according to OECD 222 eight groups of four replicates (each 10 worms) were treated with the test item at test rates of 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6, 555.6 and 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil, mixed into the soil. A similar water control group with eight replicates was maintained in untreated soil to act as a negative control, and a positive control group, with eight replicates, was treated with carbendazim at ca.5 mg a.i./kg dry soil. Adult worms were removed from the soil four weeks after treatment and the juvenile worms reared for a further four weeks.
Adult mortality of 0% was recorded at rates of 16.3, 29.4, 52.9, 95.3, 171.5, 308.6 and 555.6, mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rates. Mortality of 32.5% was recorded at 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil treatment rate (p<0.001), compared to 0% mortality in the water control group. Adult mortality of 10% was recorded in the positive control treatment.
The adult LC50 was determined to be greater than 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil, the highest rate tested.The No Observed Effect Concentration (NOEC) for adult mortality was 555.6 mg a.i./kg dry soil.
There was no statistically significant adverse effect on biomass as a function of adult bodyweight at any test item treatment rate. There was however a statistically significant increase in bodyweights.The adjusted mean bodyweight in the positive control group was 227 mg, significantly lower than the water control group (p<0.001), with a reduction of 33.3% in adjusted mean bodyweights.
There was non-statistically significant reduction in the number of juveniles produced at any test item treatment rate up to and including 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil. The EC50 for the number of juveniles on Day 56 could not be determined because there was not a clear dose-response relationship. A NOEC (reproduction) of 1000 mg a.i./kg dry soil was achieved.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for soil macroorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
- 555.6 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.