Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Distribution modelling

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
distribution modelling
Type of information:
calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
Remarks:
Migrated phrase: estimated by calculation
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Accepted calculation method.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986

Materials and methods

Model:
calculation according to Mackay, Level I
Media:
air - biota - sediment(s) - soil - water

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
EC Number:
204-428-0
EC Name:
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Cas Number:
120-82-1
Molecular formula:
C6H3Cl3
IUPAC Name:
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,2,4-Trichlorbenzol
- Analytical purity: no data

Results and discussion

Percent distribution in media

Air (%):
97.3
Water (%):
1.7
Soil (%):
0.2
Sediment (%):
0.8
Susp. sediment (%):
0
Biota (%):
0

Any other information on results incl. tables

Comparing calculated values it is obviously that the absolute amount of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene is highest for air and water in the Mackay model due to its large volume parameter for these two compartments, while distribution calculated by the Wood model considers physical-chemical properties of 1,2,4-trochlorobenzene.

Applicant's summary and conclusion