Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-428-0 | CAS number: 120-82-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in soil
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- other: EU Risk Assessment
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- other: EU Risk Assessment
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No reliability is given as this is a summary entry for the EU RAR.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
EU Risk Assessmen, 2003:
1,2,4-TCB can be degraded in soil, although very slowly (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979; Wilson et al., 1981). The aerobic mineralisation was studied using 14C-labelled 1,2,4-TCB and a mineralisation rate measured as CO2 development/day (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979).
In a study using a sandy loam (pH 6.5) added 1,2,4-TCB at a concentration of 50µg/g soil, the degradation in soil was observed to be slow. The incubation was performed at 20°C for 3 to 12 weeks. 1,2,4-TCB was subject to mineralisation as soil poisoned with 1% HgCl2 or NaN3 reduced the CO2 evolution consistently. Anaerobic conditions either continuously or alternated weekly with aerobic incubation periods markedly depressed the mineralisation. The mineralisation rate was 0.181µg/day/20 g soil equivalent to 9µg/d/kg. The turnover rate (% 1,2,4-TCB converted to CO2/day = 0.075%) was maximal at 10µg/g soil and sharply declined at higher concentrations (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979). Haider et al. (1974) used 10µg/g (in 100 g soil) and observed a mineralisation rate about twice as high.
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- other: BUA report
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- other: BUA report
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: No reliability is given as this is a summary entry for the BUA report.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- BUA report
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
BUA report (1987):
In a degradation study in soil 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was converted to 2,4,5- and 2,4,6-chlorophenol (Ballschmiter et al., 1977). Other studies support these findings. Marinucci and Bartha (1979) showed a degradation of 9 µg/kg/day. Adapted microorganisms are able to degrade 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene with high efficiency (Haberer and Normann, 1987).
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Original reference is not available.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Executive summary:
Wang, 1994:
The half-life of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in a sewage sludge-amended soil in microcosm experiments is:
half-life (d) * R period (d) loss (%) first step 22.5 0.981 0-75 83.2 second step 49500 1.0 75-259 2.26 general 23.3 0.955 85.5 The half-life of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in a standard spiked soil in microcosm experiments is:
half-life (d) * R period (d) loss (%) first step 12.5 0.972 0-75 64.5 second step 194 0.942 75-259 19.8 general 19.4 0.867 84.3 * R = regression coefficients
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Original reference is not available.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Executive summary:
Mackay, 1992:
The suggested half-life in soil is:
mean half-life (hours): 5500 ( ca. 8 months)
range (hours): 3000 - 10000- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Original reference is not available.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Executive summary:
Howard, 1991:
Half-lives in soil:
high: 4320 h (6 m)
low : 672 h ( 4 w)Scientific judgement based upon unacclimated aerobic soil grab data (low t1/2: Haider, K. et al. (1981), high t1/2: Marinucci, A.C. and Bartha, R. (1979)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Original reference is not available.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type:
- (pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
- Executive summary:
Howard, 1989:
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene will be expected to adsorb to the organic matter in soil. It will not hydrolyze but it may biodegrade, slowly in the soil.- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in soil, other
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - 14C-labeled 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was added to a soil-water-suspension
- after 5 days the test was finished and samples were taken by different chemical treatments (e.g. volatile organic compounds and CO2 in the headspace, determination of test substance and 14CO2 in aqueous phase) - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Radiolabelling:
- yes
- Soil no.:
- #1
- Soil type:
- other: loamy neutral soil
- Soil No.:
- #1
- Duration:
- 5 d
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Evaporation of parent compound:
- no
- Volatile metabolites:
- no
- Residues:
- no
- Executive summary:
Korte, 1986:
14C-labeled 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was added to a soil-water-suspension. After 5 days the test was finished and samples were taken by different chemical treatments (e.g. volatile organic compounds and CO2 in the headspace, determination of test substance and 14CO2 in aqueous phase). Following values were determined:
degradation to14CO2
[%]
volatile organic compounds [%]
activity in water
[%]
extractable activity from soil (extraction by methanol)
[%]
not extractable activity (combustion of soil)
[%]
balance
[%]
5.7
0.6
16.7
111.0
5.6
139.6
Referenceopen allclose all
EU Risk Assessment (2003):
1,2,4-TCB can be degraded in soil, although very slowly (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979; Wilson et al., 1981). The aerobic mineralisation was studied using 14C-labelled 1,2,4-TCB and a mineralisation rate measured as CO2 development/day (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979).
In a study using a sandy loam (pH 6.5) added 1,2,4-TCB at a concentration of 50µg/g soil, the degradation in soil was observed to be slow. The incubation was performed at 20°C for 3 to 12 weeks. 1,2,4-TCB was subject to mineralisation as soil poisoned with 1% HgCl2 or NaN3 reduced the CO2 evolution consistently. Anaerobic conditions either continuously or alternated weekly with aerobic incubation periods markedly depressed the mineralisation. The mineralisation rate was 0.181µg/day/20 g soil equivalent to 9µg/d/kg. The turnover rate (% 1,2,4-TCB converted to CO2/day = 0.075%) was maximal at 10µg/g soil and sharply declined at higher concentrations (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979). Haider et al. (1974) used 10µg/g (in 100 g soil) and observed a mineralisation rate about twice as high.
BUA report (1987):
In a degradation study in soil 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was converted to 2,4,5- and 2,4,6-chlorophenol (Ballschmiter et al., 1977). Other studies support these findings. Marinucci and Bartha (1979) showed a degradation of 9 µg/kg/day. Adapted microorganisms are able to degrade 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene with high efficiency (Haberer and Normann, 1987).
degradation to14CO2 [%] |
volatile organic compounds [%] |
activity in water [%] |
extractable activity from soil (extraction by methanol) [%] |
not extractable activity (combustion of soil) [%] |
balance [%] |
5.7 |
0.6 |
16.7 |
111.0 |
5.6 |
139.6 |
Description of key information
For transported isolated intermediates according to REACh, Article 18, this endpoint is not a data requirement. However, data is available for this endpoint and is thus reported under the guidance of "all available data".
Korte, 1986:
14C-labeled 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was added to a soil-water-suspension. After 5 days the test was finished and samples were taken by different chemical treatments (e.g. volatile organic compounds and CO2 in the headspace, determination of test substance and 14CO2 in aqueous phase). Following values were determined:
degradation to14CO2 [%] | volatile organic compounds [%] | activity in water [%] | extractable activity from soil (extraction by methanol) [%] | not extractable activity (combustion of soil) [%] | balance [%] |
5.7 | 0.6 | 16.7 | 111.0 | 5.6 | 139.6 |
Howard, 1989:
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene will be expected to adsorb to the organic matter in soil. It will not hydrolyze but it may biodegrade, slowly in the soil.
Howard, 1991:
The Half-lives in soil is:
high: 4320 h (6 m)
low : 672 h ( 4 w)
Scientific judgement based upon unacclimated aerobic soil grab data (low t1/2: Haider, K. et al. (1981), high t1/2: Marinucci, A.C. and Bartha, R. (1979)
Mackay, 1992:
The suggested half-life in soil is:
mean half-life (hours): 5500 ( ca. 8 months)
range (hours): 3000 – 10000
Wang, 1994:
The half-life of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in a sewage sludge-amended soil in microcosm experiments is:
half-life (d) | * R | period (d) | loss (%) | |
first step | 22.5 | 0.981 | 0-75 | 83.2 |
second step | 49500 | 1.0 | 75-259 | 2.26 |
general | 23.3 | 0.955 | 85.5 |
The half-life of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene in a standard spiked soil in microcosm experiments is:
half-life (d) | * R | period (d) | loss (%) | |
first step | 12.5 | 0.972 | 0-75 | 64.5 |
second step | 194 | 0.942 | 75-259 | 19.8 |
general | 19.4 | 0.867 | 84.3 |
* R = regression coefficients
EU Risk Assessment, 2003:
1,2,4-TCB can be degraded in soil, although very slowly (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979; Wilson et al., 1981). The aerobic mineralisation was studied using 14C-labelled 1,2,4-TCB and a mineralisation rate measured as CO2 development/day (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979).
In a study using a sandy loam (pH 6.5) added 1,2,4-TCB at a concentration of 50µg/g soil, the degradation in soil was observed to be slow. The incubation was performed at 20°C for 3 to 12 weeks. 1,2,4-TCB was subject to mineralisation as soil poisoned with 1% HgCl2 or NaN3 reduced the CO2 evolution consistently. Anaerobic conditions either continuously or alternated weekly with aerobic incubation periods markedly depressed the mineralisation. The mineralisation rate was 0.181µg/day/20 g soil equivalent to 9µg/d/kg. The turnover rate (% 1,2,4-TCB converted to CO2/day = 0.075%) was maximal at 10µg/g soil and sharply declined at higher concentrations (Marinucci and Bartha, 1979). Haider et al. (1974) used 10µg/g (in 100 g soil) and observed a mineralisation rate about twice as high.
BUA report (1987):
In a degradation study in soil 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was converted to 2,4,5- and 2,4,6-chlorophenol (Ballschmiter et al., 1977). Other studies support these findings. Marinucci and Bartha (1979) showed a degradation of 9 µg/kg/day. Adapted microorganisms are able to degrade 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene with high efficiency (Haberer and Normann, 1987).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.