Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP guideline study, available as unpublished report, minor restrictions in design and/or reporting but otherwise adequate for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986
Report date:
1986

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Bis[[R-(R*,S*)]-β-hydroxy-α-methylphenethyl)methylammonium] sulphate
EC Number:
205-154-4
EC Name:
Bis[[R-(R*,S*)]-β-hydroxy-α-methylphenethyl)methylammonium] sulphate
Cas Number:
134-72-5
Molecular formula:
C10H15NO.1/2H2O4S
IUPAC Name:
bis([(1R,2S)-1-hydroxy-1-phenylpropan-2-yl](methyl)azanium) sulfate
Details on test material:
Name of the test substance used in the study report: (-)-Ephedrin-Sulfat

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, D-6050 Offenbach/Main, FRG
- Weight at study initiation: mean 3.21 kg
- Housing: 1 animal per cage, stainless steel with wire mesh walk floor; floor area: 40 cm x 51 cm; no bedding in cages, saw-dust in waste trays
- Diet: Kliba 341, 4 MM, Firma Klingentalmuehle AG, CH-4303 Kaiseraugst, Switzerland (about 130 g per animal per day)
- Water: about 250 mL tap water per animal per day
- Acclimation period: at least 8 days before the beginning of the study

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 24
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air: fully air-conditioned rooms
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
other: untreated skin of the same animal
Amount / concentration applied:
VEHICLE
- Vehicle: 80% aqueous formulation (w/w).
- Justification choice of vehicle: Because of the natural moisture of the skin, distilled water is used to prepare the suspensions so that the test can be carried out under as physiological conditions as possible.

TEST MATERIAL
- The test patches (2.5 x 2.5 cm) were covered with an about 0.5 mm layer of the suspension (thus, about 0.5 g of thes uspension is applied).
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
72 hours
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
- Clipping of the fur: at least 15 hours before application
- Application site: upper third of the back or flanks
- Removal of the test substance at the end of the exposure period with Lutrol and Lutrol/water (1:1).
- Readings: 30 - 60 minutes after removal of the test patches and 24, 48 and 72 h after beginning of application.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 - 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 - 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the test, the substance is considered to be not irritating or corrosive to the skin.
Executive summary:

The potential to cause acute dermal irritation or corrosion was assessed in a OECD 404 guideline study. The intact skin of three Vienna White rabbits was exposed by a single topical application of an amount of 0.5 g of the test substance for 4 hours using a patch of 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm covered with a semiocclusive dressing. After removal of the patch, the application area was washed off. The cutaneous reactions were assessed immediately after removal of the patch and approximately 24, 48, 72 hours after removal. No effects were observed. It was concluded that the test substance was not irritating to the skin.