Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 29 Sep to 13 Oct 2014
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study run to a method comparable with current guidelines and to GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
Batch No.: 201309001
Purity: 99.1%

Method

Target gene:
Histidine gene in S. typhimurium, tryptophan gene in E. coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Dose range finding test: 1.7, 5.4, 17, 52, 164, 512, 1600 and 5000 μg/plate
First mutation experiment: 52, 164, 512, 1600, 5000 μg/plate
Second mutation experiment: 275, 492, 878, 1568, 2800 μg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix) for TA1535 strain.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: ICR-191
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix) for TA1537 strain.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix) for TA98 strain.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix) for TA100 strain.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix) for WP2uvrA strain.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
With metabolic activation (+S9-mix) for TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and WP2uvrA.
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION
-Dose range finding test: Selection of an adequate range of doses was based on a dose range finding test with the strains TA100 and WP2uvrA, both with and without 5% (v/v) S9-mix.
-Mutation assay: In the first experiment the test substance was tested both in the absence and presence of 5% (v/v) S9-mix in tester strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA98. In a follow-up experiment with additional parameters, the test substance was tested both in the absence and presence of 10% (v/v) S9-mix in all tester strains.

DURATION
Top agar in top agar tubes was melted by heating to 45°C. The following solutions were successively added to 3 mL molten top agar: 0.1 mL of a fresh bacterial culture (109 cells/mL) of one of the tester strains, 0.1 mL of a dilution of the test substance in DMSO and either 0.5 mL S9-mix (in case of activation assays) or 0.5 mL 0.1 M phosphate buffer (in case of non-activation assays). The ingredients were mixed on a Vortex and the content of the top agar tube was poured onto a selective agar plate. After solidification of the top agar, the plates were inverted and incubated in the dark at 37.0 ± 1.0 °C for 48 ± 4 h. After this period revertant colonies (histidine independent (His+) for Salmonella typhimurium bacteria and tryptophan independent (Trp+) for Escherichia coli were counted.

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: The revertant colonies were counted automatically with the Sorcerer Colony Counter. Plates with sufficient test article precipitate to interfere with automated colony counting were counted manually and evidence of test article precipitate on the plates was recorded. The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated, both macroscopically and microscopically by using a dissecting microscope.
Evaluation criteria:
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:
a) The total number of revertants in the tester strain TA100 is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is greater than three (3) times the concurrent vehicle control.
b) In case a follow up experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one follow up experiment.
Statistics:
None stated.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
First mutation experiment
- Precipitate: Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was observed at the start of the incubation period at the top concentration of 5000 μg/plate and at 1600 and 5000 μg/plate at the end of the incubation period.
- Toxicity: No reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed.
In strain TA1537, a fluctuation in the number of revertant colonies below the laboratory historical control data range was observed at the dose level of 1600 μg/plate (presence of S9-mix). However, since no dose-relationship was observed, the reduction is not considered to be caused by toxicity of the test substance, rather it is more likely this reduction is caused by an accidental fluctuation in the number of revertant colonies.
-Mutagenicity: No increase in the number of revertants was observed upon treatment with the test substance under all conditions tested.

Second mutation experiment
- Precipitate: Precipitation of the test substance on the plates was observed at the start and at the end of the incubation period at the concentration of 2800 μg/plate.
- Toxicity: In the second mutation assay, there was no reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants at any of the concentrations tested in all tester strains in the absence and presence of S9-mix.
- Mutagenicity: In the second mutation assay, no increase in the number of revertants was observed upon treatment with the test substance under all conditions tested.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Based on the results of this study it is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.