Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11 May 2015 ---- 23 November 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 436 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity: Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Identification methods in the protocol were tail mark and microchip; but only microchip method was used and actual animal identity was confirmed with a microchip reader. As all animals were uniquely identified, the integrity of the study was not affected.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
Name of test material (as cited in study report): 20231250
- Physical state: powder
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature (ca. 20°C) in the dark

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan (UK) Ltd.
- Age at study initiation: 9 to 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 256 to 286 g (males) and 166 to 173 g (females)
- Fasting period before study:no
- Housing: The animals were housed three of one sex per cage
- Diet: Ad libitum, standard rodent diet (Harlan teklad 2014C Diet). This diet contained no added antibiotic or other chemotherapeutic or prophylactic agent.
- Water: Ad libitum, potable water taken from the public supply.
- Acclimation period: 7 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19 to 23°C
- Humidity: 40 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr):Each animal room was supplied with filtered fresh air, which was passed to atmosphere and not re-circulated.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h continuous light and 12 h continuous dark/24 h.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: dust
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
air
Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
2.9 µm
Geometric standard deviation (GSD):
2.33
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: flow through nose only chamber. This system was an aluminium alloy construction comprising a base unit, a single animal exposure section with 20 ports and a top section incorporating a central aerosol inlet.
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Rats were held in polycarbonate tubes with their snouts protruding from the end of the tubes into the exposure chamber.
- Source and rate of air: From in-house compressed air system(breathing quality), Generator flow: 19 L/minute
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: Wright dust Feed(WDF) designed to produce and maintain test atmospheres containing dust by scraped from the surface of a compressed powder in a stream of dry air. The concentration of dust in the air was altered by changing the gear ratio of the mechanism and therefore the speed of rotation of the compressed powder towards the scraper blade.The WDF mechanism was attached directly to the top of the exposure chamber.
- Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber:
Chamber air temperature was measured using an electronic thermometer probe placed in the breathing zone of the animals via an unused exposure port. The mean chamber temperature value was 22.6°C.
- Humidity: Chamber relative humidity was measured using an electronic hygrometer probe inserted into the breathing zone of the animals via an unused exposure port. The mean chamber relative humidity was 18.7%
Pressure in air chamber was not reported.
- Air flow rate: Airflow were 19 L/minute.
- Method of particle size determination: Particle size analysis of generated atmospheres was performed using a 8-stage cascade impactor (Marple 298). A measured volume of air was drawn at a rate of 2 litres/minute from an unused exposure port on the exposure chamber through the cascade impactor and measured using a wet-type gas meter in line with a pump. Two samples were collected during the exposure. The collection substrates and the backup filter were weighed before and after sampling and the weight of test item, collected at each stage, was calculated by this difference. The total amount collected for each stage was used to determine the cumulative amount below each cut-off point size. In this way, the proportion (%) of aerosol less than < 0.52, 0.93, 1.55, 3.5, 6.0 , 9.8, 14.8 and 21.3 µm (aerodynamic diameter) was calculated. From this data, the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD), and Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) were calculated. The mean MMAD was 2.9 µm and the geometric standard deviation (GSD) was 2.33.
- Treatment of exhaust air: Extract airflow was drawn by in-house vacuum system at a flow rate of 20 L/minute. the airflow was filtered locally.

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: A measured volume of air was drawn at a rate of 2 litres/minute from an unused exposure port on the exposure chamber through a glass microfibre filter, mounted in an open face filter holder and measured using a wet-type gas meter in line with a pump. Eight samples were collected during the exposure. The filters were weighed before and after sampling.. The difference in the pre- and post-sampling weights, divided by the volume of atmosphere sampled, was equal to the actual achieved test atmosphere concentration. The mean achieved test atmosphere concentration was 5.25 +/- 0.541 mg/L

- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes, samples were collected from a vacant animal exposure port.

VEHICLE (if applicable)
- none
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
Target concentration: 5.0 mg/L
Mean achieved atmosphere concentration: 5.25 mg/L ; Standard deviation: 0.541
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3/sex/dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days

OBSERVATIONS:
- Morbidity/Mortality: Animals were checked hourly during exposure, immediately following exposure and then at 1 h and 2 hrs post-exposure. During the 14-day observation period, the animals were observed twice daily for morbidity and/or mortality.

- Clinical Signs: All animals were observed for clinical signs at hourly intervals during exposure, as soon as practically possible following removal from restraint at the end of exposure, 1 h and 2-hrs after exposure and subsequently twice daily for 14 days.

- Bodyweight: Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to treatment, on the day of exposure (Day 1) prior to dosing and on Days 2, 4, 8 and 15 (or at death).

- Necropsy: All animals were subject to a gross necropsy which consisted of opening the cranial, thoracic and abdominal cavities.any macroscopic abnormalities in appareance of the organs were recorded.
Statistics:
None

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 5.25 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Mortality:
There were 2 decedents during the study: Females 301 and 303 were sent to necropsy for welfare reasons approximately 3 or 1.75 hours respectively after completion of exposure. Clinical signs apparent for these animals immediately after exposure included unsteady gait, decreased activity, gasping, irregular or laboured breathing, wet rales, partially closed eyes and wet fur. These signs were generally present at the time of despatch to necropsy with piloerection, whole body pallor and hunched posture. Macroscopic examination revealed dark areas between 1 to 5 mm in diameter on all lung lobes.
Clinical signs:
other: Deep and/or laboured breathing was apparent in one female at 3 hours after start of exposure and in all animals at 3.5 hours after start of exposure. Immediately following exposure, clinical signs for the majority of animals included laboured deep breath
Body weight:
Body weight loss was observed in all males and the single remaining female on the day following the 4 hour exposure. The removal of food and water during exposure is considered to have contributed to the observed body weight loss and is therefore not solely attributed to treatment with the test substance.
All animals had recovered from the initial body weight loss by the next weighing occasion, and the group mean body weights from both sexes increased from Day 4 of the observation period onwards.
Gross pathology:
The macroscopic examination of the two decedents revealed dark areas between 1 to 5 mm on all lung lobes. There were no macroscopic findings in the remaining animals.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 7.2.2/1: Signs associated with dosing -Individual observations on Day 1

Group

/sex

Animal number

Day of death

Category

Observation

Day(s) observed

1 M

 

 

 

 

3hours after start of dosing

3.5hours after start of dosing

On return to home cage

1hour post dose

2hours

Post dose

At the end of the working day

0201

15

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

1

1

Behavior

Decreased activity

 

 

 

1

1

1

1

Salivation excessive

 

 

1

 

 

 

Breathing

Labored, animal appears to be breathing deeply

 

 

1

1

1

1

1

Rales,wet

 

 

 

1

1

1

0202

15

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

1

1

Behavior

Decreased activity

 

 

 

1

1

1

1

Breathing

Labored, animal appears to be breathing deeply

 

 

1

1

1

1

1

Rales,wet

 

 

 

1

1

1

0203

15

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

1

1

Behavior

Decreased activity

 

 

 

1

1

1

1

Salivation excessive

 

 

1

 

 

 

Breathing

Gasping

 

 

1

1

1

 

Labored, animal appears to be breathing deeply

 

 

1

 

1

1

1

Eyelids

Partially closed, bilateral

 

 

1

1

1

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Only animals with observations are presented

Group

/sex

Animal number

Day of death

Category

Observation

Day(s) observed

1F

 

 

 

 

3hours after start of dosing

3.5hours after start of dosing

On return to home cage

1hour post dose

2hours

Post dose

At the end of the working day

0301 WE

1

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

1

 

Behavior

Decreased activity

 

 

 

1

1

1

 

Salivation excessive

 

 

1

 

 

 

Breathing

Gasping

 

 

1

1

1

 

Irregular

 

1

 

 

 

 

Labored

1

1

1

1

1

 

Rales,Wet

 

 

 

1

1

 

Coat

Piloerection

 

 

 

 

1

 

Wet fur,Marked

1

1

1

1

 

 

Posture

Hunched

 

 

 

 

1

 

0302

15

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

1

1

Behavior

Salivation excessive

 

 

1

 

 

 

Breathing

Labored, animal appears to be breathing deeply

 

 

1

1

1

1

1

Rales, Wet

 

 

 

1

1

1

Coat

Piloerection

 

 

 

 

1

1

Wet fur,Marked

1

1

1

1

 

 

Eyelids

Partially closed, bilateral

 

 

 

 

1

1

Posture

Hunched

 

 

 

 

1

1

0303 WE

1

Abnormal gait

Unsteady

 

 

1

1

 

 

Behavior

Decreased activity

 

 

 

1

1

 

 

Breathing

Gasping

 

 

1

1

 

 

Irregular

 

 

1

1

 

 

Labored, animal appears to be breathing deeply

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Rales, Wet

 

 

 

1

 

 

Coat

Wet fur,Marked

 

 

1

1

 

 

Eyelids

Partially closed, bilateral

 

 

1

1

 

 

WE: euthanazied for welfare reasons

Only animals with observations are presented

Table 7.2.2/2: Signs associated with dosing -Individual observations on Days 2 to 15

Group

/sex

Animal number

Day of death

Category

Observation

Day(s) observed

 

 

 

 

 

Initial check

Additionnal observation

Additionnal observation

Additionnal observation

At the end of the working day

1F

0302

15

Breathing

Rales, Wet

2

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coat

Piloerection

2

2

2

2

2

 

 

 

Posture

Hunched

2-3

2

2

2

2-3

Only animals with observations are presented

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 5 based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The LC50 of the test substance was in excess of 5.25 mg/L for male and female rats.
The substance is not classified according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 and its subsequent amendments on classification, labeling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures.
According to the Globally Harmonized Classification System (GHS; UNITED NATIONS), the substance is classified as Category 5.
Executive summary:

 

The substance was tested for acute inhalation toxicity according to the OECD 436 guideline and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice.

A group of three male and three female Wistar rats was exposed, nose-only, to an atmosphere of the test item using a flow-through exposure system. The animals were exposed for four hours to a target concentration of 5 mg/L followed by a fourteen day observation period. Each animal was observed for mortality and clinical signs at hourly intervals during exposure, then one hour and two hours after exposure and at least twice a day during the 14 -day observation period. Bodyweights were recorded before treatment then on the day of exposure (day 1) and on days 2, 4,8 and 15. All surviving animals were necropsied at the end of the observation period.

The mean achieved atmosphere concentration was 5.25 mg/L and the mean mass median aerodynamic diameter was 2.9 µm.

There were two decedents during the study: 2 Female were sent to necropsy for welfare reasons approximately 3 or 1.75 hours respectively after completion of exposure on Day 1. Clinical signs apparent for these animals immediately after exposure included unsteady gait, decreased activity, gasping, irregular or laboured breathing, wet rales, partially closed eyes and wet fur. These signs were generally present at the time of despatch to necropsy with piloerection, whole body pallor and hunched posture also evident at this point. Macroscopic examination revealed dark areas between 1 to 5 mm in diameter on all lung lobes. Deep and/or laboured breathing was apparent in one female at 3 hours after start of exposure and in all animals at 3.5 hours after start of exposure.

Clinical signs for the majority of animals immediately following exposure included laboured deep breathing or gasping, unsteady gait and decreased activity; partially closed eyes, excessive salivation and wet fur. The majority of these signs were still evident at the 1 and 2 hour post-exposure and end of day checks with the exception of excessive salivation, wet fur or gasping that were not present at the 1 hour post-exposure, 2 hour post-exposure or end of day time points respectively. In addition, for a proportion of animals, wet rales was apparent from 1 hour post-exposure with hunched posture and piloerection evident from 2 hours post-exposure; these signs persisted for the surviving female up to Day 2 (piloerection and wet rales) or Day 3 (hunched posture). All males were considered normal from Day 2 and the surviving female from Day 4.

There were no adverse bodyweight effects observed. The macroscopic examination revealed dark areas between 1 to 5 mm in diameter on all lung lobes of the 2 decedents. There were no macroscopic findings on the remaining animals.

The 4 -hour inhalation LC50 was found to be greater than 5.25 mg/L (ie 5250 mg/m3).